DOW JONES, A NEWS CORP COMPANY
Sections
Aim higher, reach further.
Get the Wall Street Journal $12 for 12 weeks. Subscribe Now

What Would Reagan Do?

Michael Reagan, son of Ronald, on his relationship with his famous father and the state of politics today

Michael Reagan, son of Ronald Reagan and his first wife, Jane Wyman. ‘If we want to win on the Republican side, we’ve got to be more likable and relatable,’ Mr. Reagan says.
Michael Reagan, son of Ronald Reagan and his first wife, Jane Wyman. ‘If we want to win on the Republican side, we’ve got to be more likable and relatable,’ Mr. Reagan says. Photo: Shayan Asgharnia for The Wall Street Journal

Michael Reagan has heard his father’s name a lot lately as presidential candidates and commentators have discussed—and tried to claim—the legacy of Ronald Reagan. “How many times was my father’s name mentioned today?” he asks. “A thousand.”

In his new book, “Lessons My Father Taught Me,” Mr. Reagan, 71, aims to reveal the man behind the public persona. Organized into life lessons such as how to deal with defeat and the importance of family and marriage, the book is filled with anecdotes as well as tenets of his father’s leadership style. Mr. Reagan writes that his father negotiated with Republicans and Democrats alike, and that instead of lobbing insults at politicians with different views, he tended to agree to disagree. Today, says Mr. Reagan, “if we want to win on the Republican side, we’ve got to be more likable and relatable.”

Mr. Reagan grew up in Los Angeles as the adopted son of Ronald and the actress Jane Wyman. His parents divorced in 1949, when he was 4. When he was 6, they sent him and his sister, Maureen, to boarding school, a common practice among Hollywood parents at the time, he says.

He struggled with being the son of two celebrities. “When you’re a child being raised in a home with an actor or actress, the child is looking for the same thing the actor or actress is looking for—applause,” he says.

At first, his mother was the more famous of the couple. “I was Jane Wyman’s kid up until my dad gave that speech,” he says. He’s referring to his father’s October 1964 speech “A Time for Choosing,” given in support of Barry Goldwater’s doomed presidential campaign, which brought his father to national attention in politics.

Mr. Reagan attended Arizona State University and Los Angeles Valley College, though he never graduated. His early jobs included working as a loading-dock hand, a boat salesman and an actor with small parts in TV shows and movies. Then in 1983, he became a guest host for commentator Michael Jackson’s talk-radio show on KABC in Los Angeles, starting a 26-year stint on talk radio.

Today, people still ask him what he does aside from being the son of the former president. “I wrote seven books and have five world records in powerboat racing!” he exclaims. He became interested in the sport while working on the loading docks in Los Angeles in the mid-1960s. One of his records, set in 1983, was for racing through the Great Lakes from Chicago to Detroit in 12 hours, 34 minutes, at speeds of up to 85 miles an hour.

Mr. Reagan wrote his first book, an autobiography called “ Michael Reagan: On the Outside Looking In,” in 1988. His subsequent books have covered aspects of his life, from being adopted to being molested as a child by a camp counselor to becoming a born-again Christian. Today, he lives in Sherman Oaks, Calif., with his wife. They have two adult children.

In the past decade, Mr. Reagan has spent more time talking about his father, giving speeches around the country and running the Ronald Reagan Legacy Foundation, a nonprofit that gives out scholarships and supports exhibits about his father in museums.

Mr. Reagan says that it took him a long time to develop his own political views. After campaigning with his father in 1980, he got used to answering questions from his father’s perspective. It wasn’t until a caller on his radio show asked him how he personally felt about an issue that he stopped to figure it out.

He considers himself a moderate Republican and endorsed Ohio Gov. John Kasich in March. On Tuesday afternoon, with Indiana primary voters about to give Donald Trump a resounding victory and a clear path to the GOP nomination, Mr. Reagan tweeted: “The Republican Party is no longer the Party of Reagan.” It is “now the Party of Trump.”

He has no plans to participate in the election and says that Mr. Trump has violated what his father called the “11th commandment”: Thou shall not speak ill of any fellow Republican.

One of Ronald Reagan’s qualities that he thinks is missing in today’s politicians is common sense, with “legislators in both parties annually [voting] for bigger and bigger deficits,” Mr. Reagan writes in his new book. “I guarantee my father, were he president today, would wage all-out war against this fiscal madness.”

On a more personal note, he writes that he loved his dad but that their relationship wasn’t always easy. “He didn’t do the things with me that other kids got to do,” he writes. “He never took me to a baseball game, a football game, or Disneyland.”

But Mr. Reagan says that his father worked hard to understand his children and often shared stories and lessons with them. He recalls that at age 9, he asked his father (still an actor at the time) for a raise in his allowance. His father replied, “When I get a tax cut, I’ll raise your allowance.” A discussion on taxes and welfare programs followed. Mr. Reagan did eventually get that raise—10 years later.

Although his relationship with his father was difficult at times, Mr. Reagan says he now understands why his father couldn’t spend as much time with him as he had hoped. “I think a lot of us make the mistake of not learning while our parents are with us sometimes, and we don’t see the positive side because you’re living in that moment,” he says. “Where I’m lucky is I finally decided to sit down to figure it all out and then learn to forgive.”

Write to Alexandra Wolfe at [email protected]

31 comments
Bill Nojay
Bill Nojay subscriber

Did Reagan come up with his 11th Commandment before or after he savaged Jerry Ford in 1976?


Robert Wood
Robert Wood subscriber

Mr. Reagan tweeted: 'The Republican Party is no longer the Party of Reagan.' It is 'now the Party of Trump.'”

Yes, absolutely. Like it or not - with one caveat. Mr. Trump has stated he has no loyalty to the republican party.

David Mcmahon
David Mcmahon subscriber

Reagan was a great president and of course there are things to learn from him, but I am getting Reagan fatigue from the endless jabber about Reagan from Republicans and conservative talking heads. Mark Levin can't go a day without playing a Reagan speech and the Republican candidates can't go 2 hours without mentioning his name or comparing themselves to them. 



David Mcmahon
David Mcmahon subscriber

@John Biderbost @David Mcmahon


If you were familiar with my comment history, you would know that I am very concerned with policy and was talking about the size of government on here long before you made your first post. I actually supported Cruz but he lost so I am behind the nominee. 


I am talking about viewing Reagan like he is some kind of deity to be worshipped. Enough of the St. Ronnie stuff. 


Get off your high horse. 

John Biderbost
John Biderbost subscriber

@David Mcmahon People are talking about Reagan because, unlike you, many of us are truly interested in policy.  We have an actual philosphy of governance.  We think it is important whether or not the President wants to grow or shrink the size of government.  Things like this matter to many people. These form the basis for our decisions on whom to support.


To Trump supporters this all very dry and abstract, and cannot be explained in the two or three words slogans & sound bites that fit on a campaign sign.  Trump supporters seem to lack the intellect and attention span required to think seriously about the issues.  Their policy prescriptions can be reduced to simple slogans like: "Build the Wall", "Screw China"......Have I left out any?


C. J. HALL
C. J. HALL subscriber

Ronald Reagan may not have been the best father, or the smartest guy in every room, but he actually BELIEVED in and loved America, recognized his limitations, and surrounded himself with advisors that helped him select and reach political objectives.

Yes, he screwed up some things, but on the balance did well.

He also knew you don't convince people in negotiations by looking down at them or insulting them.  Pretty much a gentleman.

.

I miss him, and can't believe we can't seem to find his equal - somewhere among 300,000,000 Americans - to lead us.  Instead we get Hillary and Trump, both unlikable, untrustworthy to most of us.

.

Yes, the Republican party is no longer the party of Reagan, any more than the Democrats are the party of Kennedy anymore.

In fact, the Republicans would consider JFK to be too conservative, too hawkish to run in THEIR party today..

.

But can't we do better than what we're electing today?  REALLY?

David Mcmahon
David Mcmahon subscriber

@C. J. HALL "I miss him, and can't believe we can't seem to find his equal - somewhere among 300,000,000 Americans - to lead us.  "


I really liked Reagan, he was a cut above president. But he has been deceased for many years and is not coming back. I would suggest Republicans STOP LOOKING FOR THE NEXT REAGAN and stop endlessly comparing themselves to him. Yes, they can all learn from Reagan but its time to move on. 

Ray Campbell
Ray Campbell subscriber

Reading this interview reminds me all over again of how much Donald Trump nauseates me.  Who knows what the future will bring, but with any luck the GOP will get absolutely destroyed up and down the ballot this year, and then we can start over by ridding the party of anyone who has any Trump or TEA Party ties. 

David Mcmahon
David Mcmahon subscriber

@Ray Campbell


Hillary Clinton nauseates me far more. If you think we are on the right track and that our economic problems will magically fix themselves, vote for Hillary Clinton or sit out the election. 


The GOP is not going to get "absolutely destroyed". Trump is going to win in a landslide. Take it to the bank. 

Nathan Edelson
Nathan Edelson subscriber

As a charter member of the Trump Republican Party, I want to emphasize my background as a former liberal democrat who voted for Obama both times.  The NY Post now estimates that there are 20% of us who believe the democrat party has abandoned them and have come over to enthusiastic support for the Republican Candidate, enough to enable him to win, with or without so-called conservative support.  I say so-called because any Reagan Republican who would vote for Hillary Clinton in one way or the other is not a conservative at all but a radical who believes in cutting of his or her nose to spite his or her face.

Here is something to keep in mind about Reagan: the President he most admired was FDR.  The Republican Party, the Trump Republican Party is a lot bigger party than the old one because of people like me, and because of that President Trump will win big in 2016.  

Timothy Boucher
Timothy Boucher user

@Nathan Edelson


"The NY Post now estimates that there are 20% of us who believe the democrat party has abandoned them and have come over to enthusiastic support for the Republican Candidate, enough to enable him to win, with or without so-called conservative support."


You live in a "Mitt Romney in a landslide" fantasy world. The GOP is divided, not so the Democrats. This election will be a bloodbath.

Nathan Edelson
Nathan Edelson subscriber

@Timothy Boucher @Nathan Edelson

Tim the GOP may be divided, but not 50-50 or anything like that.  Probably now more like 80-20 with another 10% coming over by November, leaving 10% of former Republicans who one way or another will vote for Hillary, and the other 90% who will vote for Donald Trump.  With the 20% crossover of disaffected democrats like me and other independents, Trump will win, not necessarily in a landslide although that too is possible, as is a Republican sweep in Congress for those Republicans who actively support their Presidential Candidate.

David Mcmahon
David Mcmahon subscriber

@Nathan Edelson @Timothy Boucher


The anti-Trumpians are completely clueless. Remember how everyone was telling us Trump was about to implode? You know they have been saying that for almost an entire year. Hillary Clinton is like a boring piece of white cardboard. Trump will crush her and out maneuver her at every turn. 

David Mcmahon
David Mcmahon subscriber

@Nathan Edelson "I say so-called because any Reagan Republican who would vote for Hillary Clinton in one way or the other is not a conservative at all but a radical who believes in cutting of his or her nose to spite his or her face."


Well said. That is exactly true. I was planning on voting for Cruz but was not part of the "never Trump" crowd. When Cruz pulled out I threw my support to Trump immediately. And looking back on it I think Trump is far better positioned to win. Cruz is too rigid and that is not going to bring in independent voters. 

John Biderbost
John Biderbost subscriber

@Nathan Edelson I am struggling to wrap my brain around the idea that in a couple of years someone could migrate on the political spectrum all the way from strongly pro-Obama to strongly pro-Trump.  Can you explain that journey?  What was your big disappointment with Mr. O?  The Iran nuclear deal?

And what is the basis for your fascination with Trump?  The wall proposal?


Or perhaps every 4 years you blindfold yourself and throw a  few darts at the wall.  This year one of the darts stuck to Tump's face.

Nathan Edelson
Nathan Edelson subscriber

@John Biderbost @Nathan Edelson


Thanks for asking John.   


The main thing that disgusts me about the democrats is that they have abandoned real liberalism for political correctness, which is nothing more than a tactic to crush free speech.  By calling their bluff with his anglo saxon insults Donald Trump protects my First Amendment Rights.  And by the way, if you don’t like vulgarisms, don’t read Shakespeare.


A second reason I switched  is that a Trump Administration will get things done, not create more gridlock.  Things like rebuilding the interstate highway system to electric autonomous vehicle standards and creating millions of good American jobs in the process.


A third reason is because I believe the Trump Republican Administration will give Israel a fair shake; not a free hand but a fair shake, which is more than the democrats who hate Israel as much as they hate America.


But most of all John, America is a nation of winners, not whiners, and I am an American.




Fessendon Newport
Fessendon Newport subscriber

Mr. Reagan writes in his new book. “I guarantee my father, were he president today, would wage all-out war against this fiscal madness.”


Ronald Reagan was prescient: on February 5, 1981, two weeks after taking office, in his inaugural Address to the Nation on the Economy, Reagan said: "By 1960 our national debt stood at $284 billion. ... Today the debt is $934 billion. ... We can leave our children with an unrepayable massive debt and a shattered economy."   As a factual matter, our nation went from being the largest creditor nation in the world to the largest debtor nation in just 8 years .. under Reagan.


Also, Reagan, the guy who proclaimed that "government is the problem" ... expanded Federal government employment more than any president since .. increasing it by 24,625 employees per year in office. And, the world didn't come to an end (see BLS CES9091000001) .... yet, Conservatives worship Reagan ... who wasn't such a small government guy afterall ..

Gary Best
Gary Best subscriber

Your father gave amnesty--effectively kicking the can down the road for a couple more decades.  Reagan ran away from making the correct, right decision--deport them all.  We blamed the influence of Big Business back then--what we now call the Donor Class today---never, never again will we believe their lies.


Now 30 million illegals later, we hope President Trump will finally close the southern border(and the northern one for that matter) and start mass deportations.  Trump will hopefully do what Reagan was chicken to do.

DERICK BALL
DERICK BALL subscriber

@Gary Best

Politics has been described as the "art of the possible". Immigration reform outside of amnesty was not possible then due to congress and it likely won't be now.

Good luck with that wall.

The Chinese,Hadrian and the French learned that a wall means little.

I'm afraid you're still believing lies; just new ones.

We'll see how an inexperienced, divisive and outside guy can make congress do his bidding.

Big problems take big men with big ideas to fix them.

I hope Mr. Trump is up to the task.

William Fitzpatrick
William Fitzpatrick subscriber

As a former actor, the Great Communicator Reagan had tremendous political skill to advance his policies. Although he had complete confidence his policies were best, he went about constantly trying to persuade others. The Happy Warrior - may he rest in peace.

Robert Brown
Robert Brown subscriber

President Reagan was a great President except for one thing. By signing the illegal alien amnesty he doomed America.

Peter M. Hansen
Peter M. Hansen subscriber

Dear Mr Michael Reagan, please send a copy of your charming book to mr Trump, highlighting your father's 11th commandment.

Gary Best
Gary Best subscriber

@Peter M. Hansen

Really Peter, and what did having our dopey Republican politicians follow the 11th Commandment get us?  They lied and protected each other and stabbed us the voters in the back.  Unchecked illegal immigration, stupid wars, massive job loss from BAD trade deals, wrecked economy, banking industry out of control--need more examples. 

We're DONE being nice. 


TRUMP 2016

Robert Lombardo
Robert Lombardo subscriber

Ronald Reagan, was in the right place at the right time in 1980, America wanted to '' Great Again''

DJT, would be a better candidate if he had the party's support.


''Failure is Not an Option'' ..................America can not afford another four years of soft leadership.

Robert Clark
Robert Clark subscriber

Yes, Mr. T is not our kind grandfather figure of yesteryear, that being Ronald Reagan.  But Mr. T does have the ability and willingness to show a good heart on many occasion.  Ronald Reagan is nearly an impossible standard to be measured by.  He was tested in his youth by the Great Depression and an alcoholic father, and learned to be a savior.

Stephen Fehlinger
Stephen Fehlinger subscriber

Of the presidential candidates, John Kasich was probably the closest to the Reagen ideology. Apparently that is not what he voters want. The last seven years or so have been pretty awful. Time will tell how the next four will be.

Michael Wiley
Michael Wiley subscriber

Yeah, expanded Medicare is precisely what Reagan would have wanted......

Show More Archives
Advertisement

Popular on WSJ

Editors’ Picks