Public policy in California

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Public Policy-Main-Masthead.png


The Public Policy Project on Ballotpedia aims to illuminate major policy issues being discussed and implemented throughout the United States. Public policy can be complicated and controversial; deciding what works best and how to allocate resources to achieve a policy goal can involve multiple trade-offs. Much of the public policy that affects citizens economically, legally and socially, is made at the state level. Below you will find links and introductions to all the California public policy articles on Ballotpedia. To see the policy overview of another state click on the map below.

For a list of all public policy articles on Ballotpedia see here.

Budget Policy

Budget Policy Logo.png

Budget and finances

In California, as in other states, lawmakers and public officials are elected in part to manage the state's finances. This includes generating revenues (money coming into the state from various sources) and approving expenditures (the money spent on governmental functions and servicing state debt). State budgets are complex and fluid, as they depend on anticipated revenues and planned expenditures, which may alter over the course of a fiscal year. If revenues do not keep pace with expenditures, states generally have to raise taxes, cut services, borrow money, or a combination of the three. State budget decisions are also influenced by policy decisions at the national level, such as the Affordable Care Act or energy and environmental regulations, and issues at the local level, such as crime and the quality of education.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Between fiscal years 2015 and 2016, total government spending in California increased by approximately $15.6 billion—from $250.3 billion in fiscal year 2015 to an estimated $265.9 billion in 2016. This represents a 6.2-percent increase.[1]
  • In California in fiscal year 2015, 58.4 percent of total tax revenues came from income taxes.
  • Education accounted for 28.3 percent of state expenditures in fiscal year 2015, while 33.5 percent went to Medicaid.
  • The California state budget and financial data presented here come from different years because the states and the federal government report and publish information at different times. See the sections below for further information on the following topics:

    1. Definitions: This section defines the terms used in state budgets and on this page.
    2. Revenues: This section details the revenues of the state, as well as the sources of the revenues.
    3. Spending: This section details the expenditures of the state, in amounts as well as by type of spending.
    4. State debt: This section details the total outstanding debt in the state, as well as the debt per capita.
    5. Economic indicators: This section details various factors that are used to measure the health of the state's economy, such as poverty rate.
    6. Budget process: This section details the process involved in passing a state budget, as well as the agencies and groups that are involved in the process and a timeline of the process.
    7. Budget and finance ballot measures: This section lists ballot measures in the state relating to the state's budget and other financial matters.
    8. Budget and finance legislation: This section lists recent bills introduced by the state legislature relating to budget and finance matters.


    Taxes

    California generates the bulk of its tax revenue by levying a personal income tax and a sales tax. The state derives its constitutional authority to tax from Article XIII of the state constitution.[2][3]

    Tax policy can vary from state to state. States levy taxes to help fund the variety of services provided by state governments. Tax collections comprise approximately 40 percent of the states' total revenues. The rest comes from non-tax sources, such as intergovernmental aid (e.g., federal funds), lottery revenues and fees. The primary types of taxes levied by state governments include personal income tax, general sales tax, excise (or special sales) taxes and corporate income tax.[4]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • According to the United States Census Bureau, California collected $155.23 billion in tax revenue in 2016. The state's tax revenue per capita was $3,955.
  • Civil Liberties Policy

    Civil Liberties Policy Logo.png

    Affirmative action

    Affirmative action in California refers to the steps taken by employers and universities in California to increase the proportions of historically disadvantaged minority groups at those institutions. Historically, affirmative action nationwide has taken many different forms, such as strict quotas, extra outreach efforts, and racial and gender preferences. However, racial quotas in university admissions were banned in a 1978 United States Supreme Court case, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.[5]

    As of March 2015, 109 out of 577 public four-year universities across the country reported that they considered race in admissions. This practice has been banned in eight states. Meanwhile, 28 states require affirmative action plans in either public employment or apprenticeships. Affirmative action programs that grant racial preferences have come under scrutiny in the courts for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.[6][7]

    The following information details the use of affirmative action in universities and employment in California, as well as notable court cases originating in the state.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • California is one of eight states that have banned the consideration of race in university admissions and public employment.
  • The effects of affirmative action policies are contested. Proponents argue that affirmative action diversifies selective institutions and provides more opportunities to minorities. Opponents argue that implementing policies that favor some groups requires discrimination against others and that these policiesmay harm individuals they are meant to help.

    Campaign finance

    California campaign finance requirements govern the following:

    • how much money candidates may receive from individuals and organizations,
    • how much and how often they must report those contributions, and
    • how much individuals, organizations and political parties may contribute to campaigns.

    In addition to direct campaign contributions, campaign finance laws also apply to third-party organizations and nonprofit organizations that seek to influence elections through independent expenditures or issue advocacy.

    As of May 2015, individuals, corporations, and unions were all limited in their contributions to individual candidates: they could contribute no more than $28,200 to candidates for Governor, no more than $7,000 to statewide candidates, and no more than $4,200 to candidates for the State Senate or Assembly. All of these donors could make unlimited contributions to ballot measure campaigns.

    Nonprofit regulation

    Nonprofit regulation in California involves a complex set of rules that govern nonprofit organizations and charitable giving throughout the state. Major issues surrounding nonprofit regulation nationwide include the following:

    • contribution limits,
    • donor disclosure, and
    • the redefinition of issue advocacy.


    California is one of 39 states that require charitable organizations, and those intending to solicit on their behalf, to register with the state in order to solicit contributions, whether they are a California organization or based out-of-state. Unlike most states, organizations within California need only register after receiving their initial contribution, rather than register before being allowed to solicit contributions. In California a very small number of groups and organizations are exempt from registration. These groups are not required to apply for exempt status; it is automatic.[8]

    California was also one of 3 states (along with New York and Florida) that required organizations to file copies of IRS Form 990 Schedule B attachments, which list names and addresses of contributors who gave over $5,000. However, on April 21, 2016, the California Attorney General, Kamala Harris lost her legal case against Americans for Prosperity, in which she argued that those forms were necessary and that donors' names would not be disclosed publicly. Judge Manuel Real disagreed in the face of evidence that over 1,400 Schedule Bs were on the state's website. He issued a permanent injunction against forcing a nonprofit organization to file these forms, which the organization argued was a violation of the free speech of their donors.[9][10]

    California is one of 32 states that allows registrants to use either the Unified Registration Statement (URS) or the state registration form.[11] California-based organizations, however, may use only the state form. Only seven states requiring registration do not accept the URS.

    According to Guidestar, an organization that reports on nonprofit companies, regulation of nonprofit activity protects donors and organizations from potential fraud and helps "to maintain trust in the [nonprofit] sector." According to the London School of Economics, nonprofit disclosure requirements can create privacy concerns among potential donors, thereby having an unintended negative impact on donor participation.[12][13]

    Education Policy

    Education Policy Logo.png

    K-12 Public education

    The California public school system (prekindergarten through grade 12) operates within districts governed by locally elected school boards and superintendents. In 2013 California had 6,299,451 students enrolled in a total of 10,315 schools in 1,181 school districts. There were 266,255 teachers in the public schools, or roughly one teacher for every 24 students, compared to the national average of 1:16. There was roughly one administrator for every 386 students, compared to the national average of one administrator for every 295 students. On average California spent $9,220 per pupil in 2013, which ranked it 36th highest in the nation. The state's graduation rate was 80.4 percent in 2013.[14][15][16]

    Higher education

    California's higher education system is composed of 454 colleges and universities. Of these, 150 are public institutions, 157 are nonprofit private schools, and 147 are for-profit private institutions.[17]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • Students attending public postsecondary institutions in California from outside of the state were required to pay an average of $30,663, a 344 percent difference over the average in-state tuition of $8,903.
  • At public four-year colleges in California, 33.6 percent graduated within four years, while 64 percent graduated within six years. The rate of completion within six years was highest among neighboring states.
  • State support for public higher education in California totaled $11.7 billion in fiscal year 2015, a 22 percent increase over fiscal year 2013.
  • School choice

    School choice programs provide alternatives to parents who do not wish to send their children to the local public schools to which they are assigned. Public school choice options include open enrollment policies, magnet schools, and charter schools. In addition, governments may provide financial assistance to parents who pursue private school options. This assistance may take the form of school vouchers, which allow public school students to attend private schools; scholarship tax credits; personal tax credits and deductions; and education savings accounts (ESAs), which allow parents to receive public funds directly for educational expenses.[18][19]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • According to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, a charter school advocacy group, there were an estimated 1,234 total charter schools in California in the 2015-2016 school year. These schools enrolled approximately 581,100 students.
  • In California, there were 596,160 students enrolled in 3,390 private schools in fall 2013, accounting for roughly 8.94 percent of the state's total school-age population.
  • California offers neither school vouchers nor individual or corporate tax credits for private school choice.
  • Proponents argue that school choice programs improve educational outcomes by expanding opportunity and access for historically disadvantaged students. In addition, advocates claim that school choice programs empower parents and improve traditional public schools through competition. Critics contend that these programs divert funds from traditional public schools, thereby generating unequal outcomes for students. In addition, some critics argue that school voucher programs wrongly direct tax dollars to religious organizations, which operate many private schools.

    Charter schools

    Charter schools in California are public schools operated independently of public school systems, either by nonprofit or for-profit organizations. Although they are largely publicly funded, charter schools are exempt from many of the requirements imposed by state and local boards of education regarding hiring and curriculum. As public schools, charter schools cannot charge tuition or impose special entrance requirements; students are usually admitted through a lottery process if demand exceeds the number of spaces available in a school. Charter schools generally receive a percentage of the per-pupil funds from the state and local school districts for operational costs based on enrollment. In most states, charter schools do not receive funds for facilities or start-up costs; therefore, they must rely to some extent on private donations. The federal government also provides revenues through special grants. As of March 2017, 44 states and the District of Columbia had approved legislation authorizing the creation of public charter schools. Six states had not.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • According to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, a charter school advocacy group, there were an estimated 1,234 total charter schools in California in the 2015-2016 school year. These schools enrolled approximately 581,100 students.
  • Overall, charter school students accounted for 9.18 percent of total public school enrollment in California in 2015.
  • The California State Legislature approved the state's charter school law in 1992.
  • Election Policy

    Election Policy Logo.png

    Ballot access requirements

    In order to get on the ballot in California, a candidate for state or federal office must meet a variety of state-specific filing requirements and deadlines. These regulations, known as ballot access laws, determine whether a candidate or party will appear on an election ballot. These laws are set at the state level. A candidate must prepare to meet ballot access requirements well in advance of primaries, caucuses, and the general election.

    There are three basic methods by which an individual may become a candidate for office in a state.

    1. An individual can seek the nomination of a state-recognized political party.
    2. An individual can run as an independent. Independent candidates often must petition in order to have their names printed on the general election ballot.
    3. An individual can run as a write-in candidate.

    This article outlines the steps that prospective candidates for state-level and congressional office must take in order to run for office in California. For information about filing requirements for presidential candidates, see "Ballot access requirements for presidential candidates in California." Information about filing requirements for local-level offices is not available in this article (contact state election agencies for information about local candidate filing processes).

    California utilizes a top-two primary system. This system establishes a single primary election for all candidates running for office. The primary is open to all registered voters. The top two vote-getters in this primary election then move on to the general election, regardless of party affiliation. The system was established with the Top Two Primaries Act, which appeared as Proposition 14 on the June 8, 2010, ballot. It was approved with 53.8 percent of the vote and took effect with a special election on April 19, 2011.[20]

    Redistricting

    Redistricting is the process by which new congressional and state legislative district boundaries are drawn. Each of California's 53 United States Representatives and 120 state legislators are elected from political divisions called districts. United States Senators are not elected by districts, but by the states at large. District lines are redrawn every 10 years following completion of the United States census. The federal government stipulates that districts must have nearly equal populations and must not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity.[21][22][23][24]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • Following the 2010 United States Census, California was apportioned 53 congressional seats.
  • California's State Assembly is made up of 80 districts; California's State Senate is made up of 40 districts.
  • In California, an independent commission draws both congressional and state legislative district lines.
  • Voting

    THE BASICS
  • California permits online voter registration, early voting, and no-excuse absentee voting.
  • In California, polls are open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
  • In California, voters are not generally required to present identification at the polls.
  • Energy Policy

    Energy Policy-Logo.png

    Energy information

    Energy policy involves governmental actions affecting the production, distribution, and consumption of energy in a state. Energy policies are enacted and enforced at the local, state, and federal levels and may change over time. These policies include legislation, regulation, taxes, incentives for energy production or use, standards for energy efficiency, and more. Stakeholders include citizens, politicians, environmental groups, industry groups, and think tanks. A variety of factors can affect the feasibility of federal and state-level energy policies, such as available natural resources, geography, and consumer needs.

    Fracking

    Environmental Policy

    Environmental Policy Logo.png

    Environmental information

    Environmental policy aims to conserve natural resources by balancing environmental protection with economic growth, property rights, public health, and energy production. This is done mainly through laws and regulation passed at all governmental levels and influenced by many stakeholders with different agendas.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • As of April 2016, California was one of 18 states that supported the EPA's Clean Power Plan.
  • As of January 2016, there were 307 endangered and threatened species in California listed under the federal Endangered Species Act.
  • Endangered species

    Endangered species policy in California involves the identification and protection of endangered and threatened animal and plant species. Policies are implemented and enforced by both the state and federal governments.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • As of July 2016, California had 305 species—222 endangered species and 83 threatened species—listed under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA).
  • Of these, 122 were animal species and 183 were plant species.
  • Finance Policy

    Policypedia Finance Final.png

    Financial regulation information

    The United States financial system is a network that facilitates exchanges between lenders and borrowers. The system, which includes banks and investment firms, is the base for all economic activity in the nation. According to the Federal Reserve, financial regulation has two main intended purposes: to ensure the safety and soundness of the financial system and to provide and enforce rules that aim to protect consumers. The regulatory framework varies across industries, with different regulations applying to different financial services.[26]

    Individual federal and state entities have different and sometimes overlapping responsibilities within the regulatory system. For example, individual states and three federal agencies—the Federal Reserve, the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)—regulate commercial banks. Other sectors of the financial market are regulated by specific entities.[27][28]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • In 2015, there were a total of 182 distinct commercial banks in California, with total deposits of $1,161.21 billion.
  • The Division of Financial Institutions, a part of the Department of Business Oversight, serves as the primary regulator of financial institutions in the state.
  • In 2015, a total of 354,771 financial crimes were reported in California according to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN), an agency of the United States Department of Treasury.
  • Some, such as the Brookings Institution, argue that expanded governmental regulation of banks and financial products (e.g., mortgages) can prevent large-scale financial crises, protect consumers from abusive practices, and stabilize financial markets. Others, such as the Cato Institute, argue that over-regulation of banks of banks and financial products burdens business, stalls economic growth, and does little, if anything, to stabilize financial markets. Beyond this basic debate about the role of the government in regulating the private financial sector, there are varying opinions about the proper extent of governmental regulation.[29][30]

    Healthcare Policy

    Healthcare Policy Logo.png

    Healthcare information

    Healthcare policy in California involves the creation and implementation of laws, rules, and regulations for managing the state's healthcare system. The healthcare system consists of services provided by medical professionals to diagnose, treat, and prevent mental and physical illness and injury. The system also encompasses a wide range of related sectors, such as insurance, pharmaceuticals and health information technology.

    According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the 50 state legislatures collectively "make thousands of health policy decisions each year," not including the decisions made by local governments, which often oversee hospitals, and private bodies, such as insurers. These decisions can include budget appropriations, requirements for doctors obtaining their licenses, which services are covered by insurance, how personal health information is managed, and which immunizations children must receive, among many others.[31]

    Healthcare policy affects not only the cost citizens must pay for care, but also their access to care and the quality of care received, which can influence their overall health. A top concern for policymakers is the rising cost of healthcare, which has placed an increasing strain on the disposable income of consumers as well as on state budgets. Other issues in healthcare policy include state Medicaid expansions, health information technology and privacy, uninsured and underinsured portions of the population, a shortage of primary care physicians, and mental healthcare access and coverage.

    Medicaid spending

    California's Medicaid program provides medical insurance to groups of low-income people and individuals with disabilities. Medicaid is a nationwide program jointly funded by the federal government and the states. Medicaid eligibility, benefits, and administration are managed by the states within federal guidelines. A program related to Medicaid is the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which covers low-income children above the poverty line and is sometimes operated in conjunction with a state's Medicaid program. Medicaid is a separate program from Medicare, which provides health coverage for the elderly.

    Effect of the Affordable Care Act

    The impact of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), also known as Obamacare, has been debated among politicians, policymakers, and other stakeholders. The ACA was signed into law in 2010 by President Barack Obama (D). The law facilitates the purchase of health insurance through a system of health insurance exchanges, tax credits, and subsidies. Initially, states were required to expand eligibility for Medicaid under the law; a 2012 ruling of the United States Supreme Court made the Medicaid expansion voluntary for states. The law also requires insurers to cover a standard set of benefits and prohibits coverage denials based on preexisting conditions. Under the law, all individuals are required to obtain health insurance.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • Between 2013 and 2016, the number of uninsured individuals in California declined by 56.2 percent.
  • About 1.4 million individuals in California were enrolled in health plans offered through the health insurance exchange in 2017. Enrollment in Medicaid amounted to about 12.3 million in May 2017.
  • The Kaiser Family Foundation found that between 2016 and 2017, average monthly premiums for benchmark plans on California's exchange increased by an average of 5 percent in the Los Angeles market, from $245 to $258.

  • Immigration Policy

    Policypedia Imigration Final.png

    Immigration information

    Immigration policy determines who may become a new citizen of the United States or enter the country as a temporary worker, student, refugee, or permanent resident. The federal government is responsible for setting and enforcing most immigration policy.

    Meanwhile, states assume a largely supportive role, enacting their own supplementary laws and setting policies that may, for example, determine which public services immigrants can access, establish employee screening requirements, or guide the interaction between related state agencies and their federal counterparts.

    Some jurisdictions, including some states, cities, and counties, have adopted policies of not cooperating with federal immigration enforcement; these jurisdictions have become known as sanctuary jurisdictions.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • As of October 2016, California allowed lawfully residing immigrant women and children to enroll in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program.
  • In 2014, the population of California amounted to just over 38 million. Approximately 73 percent of California residents were native-born citizens; 12.9 percent were naturalized citizens and 14.1 percent were non-citizens.
  • California's poverty rate during 2014 was 12.3 percent. Among native-born citizens, 9.2 percent lived below the poverty line, compared to 27.8 percent of non-citizens.
  • Pension Policy

    Pension Policy Logo.png

    Public pensions

    California public pensions are the state mechanism by which state and many local government employees in California receive retirement benefits.

    According to the United States Census Bureau, there were 87 public pension systems in California as of 2016. Of these, 10 were state-level programs while the remaining 77 were administered at the local level. As of fiscal year 2016, membership in California's various pension systems totaled 2,519,484. Of these, 1,813,942 were active members.[32]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • In fiscal year 2016, total contributions of $37.8 billion were made to California's state and local pension systems. Of this amount, $10.4 billion came from employees.
  • In fiscal year 2016, California's state and local pension systems made payments totaling $52.3 billion.
  • As of fiscal year 2016, California's state and local pension systems held $761.4 billion in total cash and investment holdings.

  • Public policy in other states

    Click your state for an overview of policy information in your state.
    http://ballotpedia.org/Public policy in STATE


    Footnotes

    1. National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report (Fiscal 2014-2016)," accessed June 26, 2017
    2. California State Constitution, "Article XIII," accessed October 17, 2014
    3. Tax Policy Center, "State Tax Collection Shares by Type 2000-2013," June 20, 2014
    4. Brunori, D. (2011). State Tax Policy: A Political Perspective. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press
    5. Oyez, "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke," accessed February 11, 2015
    6. Miller Center of Public Affairs, "Affirmative Action: Race or Class?" accessed February 10, 2015
    7. Business and Legal Resources, "Affirmative Action," accessed March 31, 2015
    8. Fishman, S. & Barrett, R. (2012). Nonprofit Fundraising Registration: The 50 State Guide. NOLO.
    9. Labyrinth, Inc, "IRS 990 Schedule B Required With Registration," August 28, 2013"
    10. Wall Street Journal, "Free Speech 1, Kamala Harris 0," April 21, 2015
    11. "Multistate Filing Form," accessed December 17, 2014
    12. Guidestar, Fundraising: What Laws Apply?" accessed February 18, 2015
    13. London School of Economics, "Campaign finance laws that make small donations public may lead to fewer people contributing and to smaller donations," January 7, 2015
    14. United States Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, "Common Core of Data (CCD); Table 2.—Number of operating public schools and districts, state enrollment, teacher and pupil/teacher ratio by state: School year 2012-13," accessed May 29, 2015
    15. National Association of State Budget Officers, "State expenditure report, Fiscal years 2012-2014," accessed July 14, 2015
    16. United States Department of Education, "ED Data Express," accessed May 29, 2015
    17. National Center for Education Statistics, "College Navigator - California," accessed July 12, 2016
    18. National Conference of State Legislatures, "School Choice and Charters," accessed June 18, 2014
    19. Friedman Foundation for School Choice, "What is School Choice?" accessed June 18, 2014
    20. State Ballot Measures, "June 8, 2010 Results Page," accessed October 28, 2013
    21. All About Redistricting, "Why does it matter?" accessed April 8, 2015
    22. Indy Week, "Cracked, stacked and packed: Initial redistricting maps met with skepticism and dismay," June 29, 2011
    23. The Atlantic, "How the Voting Rights Act Hurts Democrats and Minorities," June 17, 2013
    24. Redrawing the Lines, "The Role of Section 2 - Majority Minority Districts," accessed April 6, 2015
    25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, "What Is the Difference Between Endangered and Threatened?" accessed November 16, 2015
    26. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, "Government Performance and Results Act Annual Performance Report 2011," July 10, 2012
    27. The National Bureau of Economic Research, "A Brief History of Regulations Regarding Financial Markets in the United States: 1789 to 2009," September 2011
    28. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, "The U.S. Federal Financial Regulatory System: Restructuring Federal Bank Regulation," January 19, 2006
    29. Brookings, "The Origins of the Financial Crisis," November 24, 2008
    30. The Cato Institute, "Did Deregulation Cause the Financial Crisis?" July 2009
    31. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Health," accessed July 8, 2015
    32. United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2016," accessed August 20, 2017