TEARING tears tear!
… if you are not allowed to cut with a blade or a scissor, you tear the paper with your hands and then you glue it together … and something different appears – some ~~ thing ~~ you never pre(prior) planned – common plain planes – and you cannot really explain what this face you made said – it just happened.
#1 Searching
#2 Expression
#3 I am many
#4 This is the hand that takes
#5 Pop(f)art
#6 Whoman
#7 Synthetic zero
#8 Blood
#9 Blossoms flying
#10 Félix
#11 Kindred
“Right(s) as a concept emerges in any arrangement triggered by a relationship of power (pouvoir) which concerns established ways of acting or being acted upon together with the affirmation of the multiplicity and the capacity of individual and collective bodies to affect and to be affected (puissance) by an event. RADICALLY THINKING rights, AS THINKING a life, AS THINKING LIFE RIGHTS, entail a jurisprudence of multiplicities for it is directed at accommodating multiple relations to transform the established ways of acting and being acted upon (Linda Stewart).”
the child grown into a giant journeys through the whole world
Without a pass – Die kind is nie dood nie (Ingrid Jonker May 1960)
the force that bonds A LIFE
overcoming the boundaries of time and space,
of our‘selves’
Amor fati!
yes, well, yes
Running in circles simultaneously bouncing between poles
one crawls, digging the dirt,
one try standing-up tall,
one falls,
[just-ease – just-tease]
no need to rush,
a different speed,
a passage to the outside
where it is no longer important
to say I!
Running in circles simultaneously bouncing between poles
Creating a loop
a binding force
a current
a flow
a passage to the outside
where it is no longer important
to say I!
Running in circles simultaneously bouncing between poles
Press: Enter
Press: Flow
Intertwined and outward bound
Drifting away from the hole
A kinda vertigo
– go – go – go –
Let it be!
Let it go!
from Azania via Australia via Brazil to the FACE
These are questions not critique:
What is justice?
What is injustice?
What is the relationship between justice and injustice? (either/or ..?)
Is justice a concept or possibly an affect or possibly a function and possible all of the above?
How do one ‘think and do’ justice?
Put differently, how do one think justice as a concept, function and affect with a plurality of meanings when ‘agencements’ of power are triggered, allowing one to call an established position into question?
Does it imply the overcoming of current knowledge apparatus where habit and memory serves to fuel justice with resentment and false consciousness (the idea that one is necessarily guilty)?
Does it calls for a politics of the affirmation of the multiplicity?
