Locating: Linda Stewart (1970-09-22)
I hope this explain a little who I was, who I am and what I am becoming and that said, [I don’t like writing this, because it is about ‘me’ and I am merely representing one of the copies of me, but I find it necessary, to give some insights on my face]
I am a descendant from European settlers, I was born and grew-up in Apartheid South Africa. I went to a Christian, Nationalist University and obtained my first three degrees there. I did my post-graduate studies in international/regional and domestic human right laws specialising in socio-economic rights. I teach legal hermeneutics and socio-economic rights. I have published extensively on these topics. I just completed my 20th year in formal academia. I am a full professor with a national research foundation rating.
I have attempted to do social activism work in rural, marginalised collectivities in South Africa. I have tried to participate in public participation processes. I was once a member of the ANC, the current ruling party, and stood in local elections as a candidate. I was also very much part of the establishment that tried to address the inequalities in South Africa, one of the ‘solutions’ being the introduction of a basic income grant (BIG). I have written on social protection (including social assistance, social security, social insurance and informal social protection measures). I did research for the Ministerial Committee on Social Protection (2001). I focused on the rights of vulnerable children and was and still is interested in water going beyond the right to access water in South Africa. I don’t regret doing this. I do have a good understanding how rights and constitutions operate as well as how to civil dis-obedience has potentialities for change.
About four years ago, after working with a collectivity in attempting to assist them to access land, housing and water, I went through a (personal) crisis. I could not understand why the world(s) is not what it seems to be. I started reading anthropology and philosophy. I did not engage with the history of philosophy but found an entry point (an opening door) in the works of Deleuze and Guattari. Reading Deleuze opened new world(s) to me.
As a law professor, Deleuze taught me about judgment, doxa and I learned and are still learning that there are a multitude ways of thinking, doing, and existing. I am currently going through yet again, a crisis trying to figure out how to write about inter alia the Law in terms of time and space and movement, justice as mercy, reconceptualising rights, not human rights (but a system of rights focusing on a situation), how courts operate and how in my eyes, constitutionalism has become a new form of colonialism and human rights an universal religion. There are numerous other issues included and outside these issues.
Putting it differently, one might say, I am interested in optional ethical (Spinoza/Deleuze) organising principles (navigating tools) opening-up movement in culture, morality, established ways of thinking and doing that are at present restricting multitude of ways of existence. In my world, there are no subjects, signs, signifiers. I am not concerned with moral arguments but with the processes opening up new possibilities. I work with relations between bodies (Spinoza’s idea of bodies) and how power and power (puissance) our capacity to act and be acted upon is intermingled and indeed highly complex.
What I am trying to say, is that I had no grounding when I started (and possible this may be a good thing). This process is exhausting!! Along with this, I experience my own marginalisation within the academic environment.* It is also important to note that I am a diagnosed Bipolar that have been taking psychiatric drugs for more than 18 years.
Enough said!

!!! Any comments or questions are welcome and will be appreciated in the spirit of friendship !!!
Like this:
Like Loading...