DOW JONES, A NEWS CORP COMPANY
Sections
Aim higher, reach further.
Get the Wall Street Journal $12 for 12 weeks. Subscribe Now

Can You Carbo-Load Your Way to Good Health?

A revolution is afoot in bakeries across the country. With highly processed flour giving way to freshly milled whole grains rich in nutrients as well as flavor, it might just be OK to love bread again

ENLARGE
Illustration: Guy Shield

The bread arrived by UPS, heavy as flesh, wrapped in brown paper. Its springy crust belied a two-day journey from baker Avery Ruzicka at Manresa Bread in Los Gatos, Calif.

If shipping bread cross country seems like a wanton act of locavore disobedience, consider that I’m not talking about just any loaf. The one Ms. Ruzicka sent me was made using Oregon-grown Edison wheat berries, ground to flour shortly before being mixed with water, naturally fermented for 24 hours, then baked to tangy, tender goodness. This bread is imbued with all the nutritional virtues of the wheat kernel—perhaps the most misunderstood ingredient in modern America. Forget juicing. Forget bone broth. With bread like this, many chefs and bakers have come to believe, you can carbo-load your way to optimal health.

Ask Adam Leonti, who, like Ms. Ruzicka, grinds his own flour for pasta, bread and pizza dough. Mr. Leonti shed 15 pounds eating sourdough breads made from wheat pulverized by the 10,000-pound stone mill at his Brooklyn Bread Lab.

“There’s fiber in there, which is missing from peoples’ diets altogether,” Mr. Leonti said. “You have all these enzymes that are alive and volatile, which are extracted from white flour to make it shelf stable. Those are the things your body is searching for to make digestion happen, to make nutrition happen.”

The farm-to-table revolution has transformed most of the restaurant pantry, but even sophisticated kitchens still largely craft baked goods and pastas from lily-white commodity flour, an ingredient short on flavor and nutrition. Thus, baguettes and bucatini have come to be understood in some quarters as deviations from a wholesome diet.

Recently, though, a growing number of bakeries and restaurants around the country have begun to grind their flour fresh, or work with local mills to do it. The practice boils down to more than effete notions of superior flavor or artisan virtue; this flour teems with vitamins, minerals and antioxidants freshly liberated from the wheat kernel—elements that have been largely absent from American baked goods for generations.

Chad Robertson, whose Tartine bakery in San Francisco sits at the epicenter of the artisan-bread movement, is in the midst of taking his milling in house. Last year Marco Canora installed a mill at Hearth in New York City, and he uses it to grind corn and wheat for polenta, pasta and pastries. At Union Restaurant in Pasadena, Calif., Bruce Kalman makes his pasta from durum and other wheats ground by a local miller, Grist & Toll. At Vetri Ristorante in Philadelphia, head baker Claire Kopp McWilliams now mills all the flour for their breads, pasta and pastries, from wheat procured directly from farmers. Add to their number Richard Bourdon at Berkshire Mountain Bakery in Western Massachusetts, David Bauer at Farm & Sparrow in North Carolina, Chris Bianco at Pizzeria Bianco in Arizona and Justin Slojkowski at Bruno Pizza in New York—committed millers, all.

To understand flour, you must know the wheat kernel, which comprises a fibrous outer layer, the bran; a starchy middle layer, the endosperm; and the vitamin-rich core, or germ. For most of human history all wheat was milled whole. White flour, a modern invention, is produced by grinding only the endosperm for shelf-stable starch that is later enriched with a handful of vitamins and minerals.

Farm + Sparrow Heirloom Grit Bread, Brooklyn Bread Lab Baguette,   Berkshire Mountain Bakery Bread + Chocolate, Tartine Danish Style Sprouted Rye  ,Manresa Pull Pan Loaf, Manresa Levain ENLARGE
Farm + Sparrow Heirloom Grit Bread, Brooklyn Bread Lab Baguette, Berkshire Mountain Bakery Bread + Chocolate, Tartine Danish Style Sprouted Rye ,Manresa Pull Pan Loaf, Manresa Levain Photo: F. Martin Ramin/The Wall Street Journal, Styling by Anne Cardenas

Freshly milled flour is also worlds apart from the so-called “whole wheat” flours and baked goods on supermarket shelves. Typically, those are made by mixing white flour with a small amount of wheat bran but with the wheat germ omitted altogether because its oils limit shelf life. (For those playing along at home: Community Grains, Grist & Toll and Carolina Ground are three excellent online sources for whole-milled flour. The flour starts losing its flavor immediately after milling, and should be used within a week for best results. Store it in the freezer to preserve flavor and prevent it from turning rancid.)

This generation of whole-grain milling is still in its infancy, and nutritional data on freshly milled flour is scant, though it’s clear enough what highly processed flour is missing. “Wheat is incredibly nutritious, but when you mill in such a way that you remove the bran and germ, you’re losing the micronutrients that we need the most,” said Dr. David Killilea, a nutritional biochemist at the Children’s Hospital of Oakland Research Institute. “When you compare what’s removed from wheat to make commercial flour, it tracks pretty well with the nutrients that are most deficient in the U.S. population.” A long ferment—letting bread rise 24-48 hours—has the further beneficial effect of breaking down gluten, making it easier to digest.

“One huge difference I find is when you’re eating this type of whole food product, freshly milled and long-fermented, it fills you up,” said Mr. Robertson. “I eat bread every day, at a lot of meals, but I don’t eat a ton of it because I’m eating stuff that’s more whole-grain, and it’s satisfying, and you feel it in your body in a different way.”

For an increasing number of chefs and bakers, that difference makes it worth putting up with the challenges that attend fresh milling, which are many. Rick Easton, who closed his acclaimed Pittsburgh bakery, Bread & Salt, a few months ago, said he paid $1.40 per pound for a whole-milled product, while commodity flour runs around 20 cents a pound. “Most of my customers just wanted to know why the bread doesn’t cost $2 a loaf,” he said. Sourcing wheat from local farmers subjects bakers to the whims of their varying harvests, and flour milled this way lacks the consistency of industrial flour, making it more finicky to bake with. Despite all that, Mr. Easton hopes to re-open his bakery in New York City.

J.D. McLelland, whose forthcoming documentary “Ingrained” chronicles the rebuilding of regional grain economies, predicts that improvements in milling technology and more widespread cultivation of grains fit for whole milling will soon make high-quality flour more accessible and affordable. He likens wheat kernels to coffee beans: Grinding to order was rare 20 years ago, but now it’s expected. “The biggest element that could improve grain is treating it like a fresh product,” he said. “Aroma equals flavor, and flavor equals nutrition.”

156 comments
GENIE BAKALE-ALDRICH
GENIE BAKALE-ALDRICH subscriber

Gee.... soooo tempting.  When I eat bread, like these. it turns to sugar. Then I have to take a nap.  I could live/sleep on bread. Boo Hoo .too dangerous for me.  However, they looks fantastic.... 

Richard Cronin
Richard Cronin subscriber

Thomas Farrelly...you raised a good point. We use Bob's Red Mill 100% stone ground whole wheat flour which states "It contains all the precious oil from the wheat germ, fiber from the wheat bran, and protein from the inner endosperm-nothing added or removed". 

I hope we are on the right track now with our home baking, if in fact you do not  have this in store bought products.

BTW ...I timed the initial prep time for today's bread. It took 5 min with minimal cleanup (mixing bowl & hand dough hook). The long rise, second rise and oven time is for tomorrow and just as simple....oh so satisfying! 

Hat's off and thanks to WSJ. Sullivan's bakery, Breadtopia.com. and iDiet.com for teaching us a better, simpler and  healthier way. 


There is an old saying..When the student is ready..the teacher appears! 


Thomas Farrelly
Thomas Farrelly subscriber

"Freshly milled flour is also worlds apart from the so-called “whole wheat” flours and baked goods on supermarket shelves. Typically, those are made by mixing white flour with a small amount of wheat bran but with the wheat germ omitted altogether because its oils limit shelf life."

Are you sure of this?  After reading the article, I stopped in a supermarket and looked at flour. Only one, Gold Medal, claimed to be whole wheat, and the description indicated that it was made from the whole wheat grain.  Are you sayiing this is not true?  I'd really like to know.

Richard Cronin
Richard Cronin subscriber

We are senior citizens, new to  the world of home made bread, and would like to share our wonderful experience.

For the last 5 months we have been following Breadtopia.com for clear and uncomplicated video instructions on technique and the results are perfect for us. We started out with Eric's version of the WSJ ever popular No Knead bread and went on from there. We now bake at least twice a week and have not purchased store bought bread since coming upon this resource. We love experimenting with different flour and have not had one failure.

Also, my wife is on the iDiet (Dr Susan Roberts -Tufts Univ Friedman School of Nutrition lab) and she maintains a very healthy weight now while enjoying the homemade no knead iDiet legal bread every day. 


We cannot get over the change all of this has made in our everyday lives and only wish we had started doing all this decades ago. 





diana seminer
diana seminer subscriber

THINKING,just thinking,perhaps

that the fiber changes the digestion process?????

and perhaps the metabolic response in humans?????

just a thought

I am going to give it a try.

The bread in Russia-made in this fashion is simply beyond delicious

and SATISFYING


Mark Mahaffey
Mark Mahaffey subscriber

do not understand all this. main problem is obesity. carbs = 4cal/g,  protein = 4 , alcohol=7, fat = 9. try stay away from fat and eat more carbs and protein in moderation.

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

Very dumb! Carbohydrates remain unchanged by slightly diluting them with supposedly healthy impurities. Yet these health food faddists continue to promote the idea that carbohydrates can be made somehow more healthy if they can be given a different label. Sucrose-sweetened soft drinks are healthier than HFCS, Raw honey is better than purified honey, which is better than HFCS. In every case the product that is healthier for you is, coincidently, also much more expensive. In every case the carbohydrates are unchanged and any effects that have on your health (or lack thereof) are the same. 

So, buy your heirloom bread, organic food, Prada purses,... - whatever makes you feel good about yourself, and perhaps even tastes better. But cut out the BS about nutrition. It is misleading and harmful. 

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@Jack Oswald @ROBERT SUNDAHL So, why should I have to read the writings of some amatuer on what he thinks science tells us? He is selling a narrative. Are there really scientific articles that tell is that starch in whole wheat bread is not converted into glucose? That something magical happens to it to reduce its effect? Post the link to this scientific paper and let me, a scientist with training in chemistry, decide if that it really what it says. 

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@Carl Lohan @ROBERT SUNDAHL

Another point made by Lustig is that fructose is 73% sweeter than sucrose and more than twice as sweet as glucose. So a blend of glucose and fructose is 25% sweeter than sucrose. HFCS could be used to REDUCE sugar content by 20%. Lustig claims soft drink manufacturers ignore this financial opportunity. But that turns out to be untrue - they do reduce the sugar added. Lustig must have thought this would distract from his narrative. 

THOMAS QUICK
THOMAS QUICK user

@ROBERT SUNDAHL @Carl Lohan What distracts from the sugar narrative the most is that it's not the cause of the obesity crisis. 80% of the 500 calorie per day increase in US calorie consumption 1970-2005 is from refined grains (starches) and added fats (almost entirely seed oils). Equivalent in composition and quantity to an extra bag of salty chips a day. Only 6% of the calorie increase - 30 calories a day - is from sweeteners (sucrose and fructose). That amounts to an extra soda twice a week. By and large the rise in obesity did not stem from the swilling Big Gulps but from the eating more chips.


http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib33.aspx



Perry Jennings
Perry Jennings subscriber

You need a drink and a chill pill. No one is trying to make you eat something you don't want to.

Jack Oswald
Jack Oswald subscriber

@ROBERT SUNDAHL Read my post before you call this BS.  This type of bread is different.  Read Michael Pollan's section on fermentation in Cooked. Then get the scientific papers that he references (I did), then get the papers referenced there (I did)...and a whole new and accurate point of view will emerge.

THOMAS QUICK
THOMAS QUICK user

As a research scientist who's worked with polysaccharides for years I ask you why does that matter? Asking a rhetorical question about starch metabolism is a poor strategy. Why do you care about glucose? In bread and potatoes it's not even a sweetener. Isn't your fight with fructose?

THOMAS QUICK
THOMAS QUICK user

They aren't allowed to drink beer and bourbon, and wine is seriously suspect. Grains and fruits are verboten. A cube of butter in their coffee is what these troopers like.

As Svejk said "On to Belgrade!"

RAY ANTONELLI
RAY ANTONELLI subscriber

@ROBERT SUNDAHL @Jack Oswald

The Michael Pollan book is OUTSTANDING. He really knows his stuff.

The part on fermentation is eye opening. I've always loved Claussen pickles and now I have a great reason to keep eating them. Oh the garlic...

Carl Lohan
Carl Lohan subscriber

@ROBERT SUNDAHL I tend to view these fads with the same degree of skepticism. However, after watching Sugar:The Bitter Truth I learned that calories are not the same. HFCS, for example, is not digested the same way as regular sugar. Caloric content may be the same but the effect on your body is much different. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@Carl Lohan @ROBERT SUNDAHL Is there any scientific research done on Whey Low, or is the only information the marketing material on yet another food scam? 

Stevia is not metabolized by the body. 

Lustig states OVER AND OVER that HFCS and sucrose have an identical effect because they have identical amounts of fructose in them. However, he also states that HFCS is sweeter than sucrose, so can be used in less amounts to obtain the same sweetness. 

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@THOMAS QUICK THIS discussion is about the claims of a health advantage of one source of starch over another. I agree with you. The author's assertion that there is a difference is fallacious. If one tastes better, fine. That is all there is to it. 

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@THOMAS QUICK @ROBERT SUNDAHL @Carl Lohan I agree. that starches are a significant source of calories. Whether the grains are "refined" or not, does not change the effect of the starches, except possibly diluting the amount in the food product. 

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@RAY ANTONELLI @ROBERT SUNDAHL @Jack Oswald

"He knows his stuff" "he's an acknowledged authority"

He is a professional writer, who makes a living by selling books and articles.  He has chosen this topic to write about because a lot of people buy books and read articles on this topic. He has NO education in the field of nutrition. You think he is an "acknowledged authority" because you like pickles and he told you they were good for you. 

RAY ANTONELLI
RAY ANTONELLI subscriber

@ROBERT SUNDAHL @RAY ANTONELLI @Jack Oswald Robert, Have you read his books? If you did I think even you would find some good ideas and kernels of truth. I don't "think" he is an authority. The people who praise him are mostly experts in their field.

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@RAY ANTONELLI @ROBERT SUNDAHL @Jack Oswald I do not read pop versions of science with a narrative to sell. They are always written to sell the book, and are filled with exaggerations, misinformation and, many cases lies. Show me a scientific paper that is relevant to the discussion here about carbohydrates, and I will read it. 

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@Carl Lohan @ROBERT SUNDAHL I have considerable experience with patents, and can tell you that the issuance of a patent does not depend on any scientific confirmation. The only requirement is innovation. Claims made in a patent do not have to be documented.

My search never came up with any reference to "University of Maryland", which is not surprising, since universities do not give approval to food products. Approvals fall under the jurisdiction of the FDA. 

Rewatch, and look for

1. HFCS is identical to sucrose in its effects.

2. HFCS is sweeter than sucrose, so could be used to reduce the intake of fructose, but it isn't used that way. That last assertion is a falsehood. HFCS users do cut back on HFCS, reducing sugar content in a product, to save money. 

THOMAS QUICK
THOMAS QUICK user

@ROBERT SUNDAHL @THOMAS QUICK @Carl Lohan


If you're referring to the USDA study on 1970-2005 trends, it's based on food availability. I'm not sure what you're talking about regarding the food pyramid.


The data set is updated through 2010 here.


http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-availability-(per-capita)-data-system/summary-findings.aspx


Note the last graph, which is composed of the grams per day per person for fat, carbs and protein. You can click on the data and see it in tabular form. Note particularly the dramatic and steady increase in fat consumption. On a calorie basis I calculate that the 2010 US diet consists of 43% fat/45% digestable carbs/12% protein.



THOMAS QUICK
THOMAS QUICK user

@ROBERT SUNDAHL @THOMAS QUICK @Carl Lohan continuing, 


The steady increase in fat consumption shown by USDA is at odds with the numbers Taubes used to justify his carb insulin assertion in the early 2000's. His numbers were derived from the FDA's NHANES self-reported dietary surveys, which show a slight shift towards higher % carbs and lower % fat pre 2000. These numbers have been exposed as fallacious, first by U South Carolina and subsequently confirmed by Mayo Clinic.


http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(15)00319-5/abstract


In short, the food consumption reported by the NHANES M-BM survey participants is not consistent with their weight. They have misreported and underreported their food consumption.


But of course you knew all that because you're up-to-date @robert. I'm sure you have updated your copy of GoodCalBadCal. I trust you have removed the fallacious graphs on p233, as well as the entire chapter on the mythology of obesity, which is a love-letter to NHANES. 

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@Carl Lohan @ROBERT SUNDAHL

You misunderstood the talk completely. The speaker said that HFCS is identical in digestion to "regular" sucrose. Both are equally bad. Honey, a "health food" is identical to HFCS. The speaker clearly stated that the effect is identical. 

ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@THOMAS QUICK @ROBERT SUNDAHL @Carl Lohan


Thanks for the link to an interesting paper. I read

"The food availability data show that food consumption patterns have changed considerably since 1970. In 2013, each American had available to consume, on average, 57 pounds more commercially grown vegetables,; 23 pounds more fruit; 9 pounds more caloric sweeteners; 36 pounds more poultry; 3 pounds more fish and shellfish; 22 pounds more cheese; and 38 pounds more grain products34 pounds less red meat, 50 fewer eggs, 8 gallons less coffee, and 12 gallons less milk.


Assume the change in diet has led to obesity. Where did the extra calories come from? One would have to assign a caloric value to each component. But it is clear that replacing meat with vegetables and fruit had no effect (at best). 

The only high fat item on the list that increased was cheese. How can an increased fat diet account for a trend in obesity? 



Carl Lohan
Carl Lohan subscriber

@ROBERT SUNDAHL @Carl Lohan Went back over the video. Yes, you are correct, sugar and fructose are the same. However, HFCS is sweeter than fructose and yet has been used in the same quantities in our diets, so we get fatter. Also, in the context of this article, the breads being promoted are higher in fiber, which is important for your body to feel full or satisfied.


The new series, The Skinny on Obesity, put out in 2012 is worth viewing.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0zD1gj0pXk&index=1&list=PL39F782316B425249

THOMAS QUICK
THOMAS QUICK user

@ROBERT SUNDAHL @THOMAS QUICK @Carl Lohan Grain products (seed  oils) and poultry are where the additional fat comes from. But pay more attention to the 1909-2010 data table underlying the final graph, which shows the macronutrients themselves instead of the food groups.


http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/179795/carbs_intake_d.html


The extra calories came from the increases in fat and carbohydrates. In 2010 fat availability is 190 grams per day (1710 cal), digestable carb availability 474-25 = 449 grams per day (1796 cal), protein availability 120 grams per day(480 cal). 


ROBERT SUNDAHL
ROBERT SUNDAHL subscriber

@Carl Lohan @ROBERT SUNDAHL


You are still contradicting the point made by the speaker. He clearly stated the opposite. Since HFCS is sweeter, less sugar has to be added to a product to obtain a desired sweetness, meaning LESS calories for HFCS. He asserted in his talk that food manufacturers do not use this advantage. However he is wrong on that respect. Manufacturers do add fewer calories (and fructose) with HFCS than those who use sucrose. 

If there is some data that shows some trend in bread consumption, I would agree with your assertion. 

Ted Kowalski
Ted Kowalski subscriber

Oh wow!


Another public relations rewrite making common things sound fancy and special.


The author then orders specially ground, fermented, baked and shipped bread writing how wonderful that bread is.


Odd, this whole wheat nonsense originally started back in the 1970s, when folks claimed how healthy and flavorful whole wheat bread is.


Whole wheat bread tastes like cardboard then and still does now.


The germ of a wheat kernel spoils very quickly, far quicker when ground along with the kernel. Extra fiber is obtained by grinding the chaff, which even primitive peoples did their best to separate out.


White bread is ground without the kernel so that it stores better. There is no process to remove enzymes, nutrients, vitamins, whatever from flour. Some flour is bromated to quickly bleach it to white. Other flour is allowed to age naturally to white.


When peasants made peasant bread, why did they happily change to high gluten white bread? Perhaps their teeth wore down too quickly on whole wheat.

THOMAS QUICK
THOMAS QUICK user

I add extra gluten to 100% whole wheat to improve its integrity. Crumbs are reduced substantially.

THOMAS QUICK
THOMAS QUICK user

they only ate the white bread because pizza hadn't been invented...

Mallika Hegde
Mallika Hegde subscriber

@Ted Kowalski You are correct - the kernel is removed so the flour stores better. You do lose a lot of the nutrients with the kernel though, and not all of them can be replaced. There is one point on which I disagree - properly made whole wheat bread does not taste like cardboard. It is in fact not that hard to make soft and great tasting 100% whole wheat bread. It does tend to be more unforgiving of your flour to water ratio, though, and simply dumping in premeasured quantities of flour and water is an invitation for disaster. 

MARK DEWALD
MARK DEWALD subscriber

@Ted Kowalski

High gluten white bread was introduced post WWII by commercial bakers if I'm not mistaken..

What peasants are you talking about?

Ted Kowalski
Ted Kowalski subscriber

@Mallika Hegde @Ted Kowalski 


"...It is in fact not that hard to make soft and great tasting..."


Fresh baked, by a knowledgeable baker with fresh ingredients, I agree to a limited amount.


Bread is baked to serve many purposes. Even fresh whole wheat bread fails to meet all purposes that bread is put to.

The chaff, bran crumbs and kernel pieces fall off everywhere.

The bread itself, while soft, is crumbly and cracks easily.


Pizza, French, Italian, Naan, Pita, Khubz, doughnuts, puff pastry... 


The kernel oils, exposed to oxygen and light, go rancid very quickly. It is odd, that no-one ever mentions the preservatives added to whole wheat flour trying to slow the rancidity.


Many of the above breads can survive a proportion of good whole wheat flour without all of the chaff and bran particles added.


You desire good/great whole wheat bread, go ahead; grind your own flour then make any of the great country/peasant breads of the world!


Don't try to make everyone eat only commercial whole wheat bread.

Ted Kowalski
Ted Kowalski subscriber

@MARK DEWALD @Ted Kowalski 


The bread/flour you are referring to was the 'new' process of commercially separating the germ from the kernel.


Previously to that new process, all one had to do was sift the larger kernel pieces out.

Check out any of the older cook books, 1950s and earlier where every baking recipe starts with sift the flour.

Since this also separated out stones and bits of wood, this was then fed to chickens/ducks/geese; still destined for eventual dinner.


Pastries in many cultures, croissants, baklava, Danish, puff, etc... depend on that consistent fine grain flour without rancid wheat germ kernels.

Jack Oswald
Jack Oswald subscriber

Why do people who eat these breads/carbs lose weight? It is the Prebiotic Soluble Fiber (PSF) that is produced during the long fermentation by the bacteria in the co-ferment. The wheat also must naturally have some sucrose which wheat used to make before the modern era.  PSF is a specific type of fiber that uniquely feeds the beneficial bacteria that live in your gut (see isot.us/wsj2).  When these bacteria are fed they feed the gut's cells so it can function properly.  If you don't consume enough PSF daily the bacteria will instead consumer the protective lining of the gut which leads chronic disease, serious digestive issues.  Historically, many cultures ate 1 kg of these breads daily and is how they got enough PSF.  We have shown that it is still possible to make such breads that have PSF but this is not easily available to everyone.  @Steve Cook @Charleen Larson @THOMAS QUICK @ELTON TENG @Amy Dudley @Timothy Harrell @George Macdonald @Leighton Anderson @Timothy Bingham 

MARK DEWALD
MARK DEWALD subscriber

"This generation of whole-grain milling is still in its infancy, and nutritional data on freshly milled flour is scant, though it’s clear enough what highly processed flour is missing"


Really?  This type of bread has been around for about 6,000 years.


Funny how we (Americans) look for double-blind randomized data on healthy foods like ancient grain breads and raw milk - 

But when it comes to processed junk food, that the US Government says is OK - oh, and by the way - subsidizes its manufacture - we'll stick that right in our mouth.

THOMAS QUICK
THOMAS QUICK user

Just follow the corn....corn flour fried in corn oil...salt it and put it in a mylar bag...obesity express....

James Collins
James Collins subscriber

Years ago I saw (or think I saw) a story on or an ad for a bread bag.  It was designed  and manufactured to preserve and keep bread fresher, to keep it from hardening and getting stale.  I recall it had some connection with Berkeley, CA (which may explain my lack of recall).  

Would love to find something like it; any ideas?

Thanks

Show More Archives
Advertisement

Popular on WSJ

Editors’ Picks