DOW JONES, A NEWS CORP COMPANY
Sections
Aim higher, reach further.
Get the Wall Street Journal $12 for 12 weeks. Subscribe Now

Is the Jetpack Movement Finally Taking Off?

Personal flight, once a pipe dream, is now within our reach. But futuristic transportation does not come cheap

Engineers at JetPack Aviation say they have finally constructed the first true jetpack: A machine powerful enough to propel humans into the air long enough to cover their commute. But will this mode of transportation become a reality? PHOTO: DYLAN COULTER FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

DAVID MAYMAN’S RIGHT THIGH is covered by a skin graft, the aftermath of a jetpack crash. In 2010, a “rocket belt” he bought in Mexico shot 1,300-degree steam down Mayman’s leg after he missed a landing in Australia, leaving him with third-degree burns. Today, in an avocado orchard north of Los Angeles, the clean-cut, 53-year-old Australian millionaire wears a thick, black flame-retardant jet suit. He asks the small crowd to don protective eyewear. Fire extinguishers are on hand.

Mayman flips a switch and the two jet engines strapped to his back roar to life. Heat waves and jet fumes radiate from the twin turbines as the engines rev up. And then, without warning, Mayman’s feet leave the ground. His upward progress is slow and stable; 10 seconds after liftoff, he’s eye-level with a drone hovering at 20 feet. Mayman gives a thumbs-up for the camera and then floats back and forth over the field. It’s thrilling to see and overwhelming to hear; this long-promised vision of the future comes with a 120-decibel soundtrack—louder than a chainsaw.

An entrepreneur and aviation buff from Sydney, Mayman retired early to dedicate himself to flying with nothing but the pack on his back. His company, JetPack Aviation Corp., has spent about 10 years and $10 million on this latest version: an 85-pound aluminum and carbon-fiber contraption that burns 11 gallons of jet fuel for a 10-minute flight. The nine-person firm is now seeking $2 million to $5 million to add rocket-propelled parachutes—in case of unscheduled landings—and bring its jetpack to market for about $250,000 a pop.

“There’s so much further we can take this,” Mayman says. “We want to raise that money to fund the R&D. Because somebody’s going to do it if we don’t.”

THE PROMISE OF PERSONAL FLIGHT has for decades seduced aviation junkies who—in the face of prohibitive costs and the uncooperative laws of physics—have tried to make Elroy Jetson’s hobby a reality. While Mayman’s prototype is the closest to the comic-book ideal of the jetpack, a handful of other optimistic tinkerers are also competing for the market.

In Dubai, Yves “Jetman” Rossy, a 57- year-old former Swiss Army fighter pilot, drops out of helicopters and fires up his so-called jetwing, a 7-foot carbon-fiber wing with four small jet engines. It can reach 200 miles per hour and fly for about 10 minutes. But the jetwing lacks a key capability in the eyes of jetpack purists: vertical takeoff and landing.

In New Zealand, Martin Jetpack has the self-flying device closest to market—it went on sale in Australia last year—but furthest from the Rocket Man ideal: The pilot straps himself onto the 7-foot-tall, 440-pound craft, not the other way around. Martin calls the device “an economic and practical alternative to traditional helicopters,” with a maximum flight time of 30 minutes and a price tag of at least $250,000.

Martin Jetpack has letters of intent with three Chinese companies for as many as 100 craft, and the Dubai Civil Defense has agreements to buy 20 more for first responders. Martin says it’s also exploring opportunities in first responder, commercial and personal transport markets. “There is some talk of having two jetpacks on top of every skyscraper in China,” Martin CEO Peter Coker says, calling them “high-rise lifeboats” for Chinese VIPs in case of a disaster or attack.

And then there’s the Flyboard Air, a hoverboard that runs on jet fuel. In April, French jet-ski champion Franky Zapata unveiled the device—effectively a pair of snowboard boots attached to four small jet turbines—which he promptly used to shatter the Guinness world record for “farthest flight by hoverboard,” surfing on air for 7,388 feet off the southern coast of France. Zapata says he wants to launch a series of hoverboard races—and even wants to race Mayman with his jetpack—as well as explore military and rescue applications. “We can dream everything, and we can go forward on every crazy idea we have,” he says. “Why not?”

Well, several reasons. Jetpacks and similar devices face major challenges to becoming more than just a gimmick. They’re inherently heavy, deafening and gas-guzzling. They offer flight times in minutes, not hours. And they lack commercial applications. (Jetpack backers’ go-to examples are fighting fires in skyscrapers and helping paramedics beat traffic.) Jetpacks are also likely to inhabit a slice of airspace that is too low for parachutes but high enough for a fatal fall. And even if they hit the market as an expensive toy, they’ll cost closer to a Lamborghini than a dirt bike.

Even Google couldn’t make it work. “The jetpack is a death trap because the engines go off and you’re dead,” says Astro Teller, the head of X, the so-called moonshot factory of Google parent Alphabet Inc. GOOGL -0.06 % His team dropped the jetpack in favor of a gyrocopter—essentially a backpack helicopter that descends slowly thanks to a rotor that turns naturally, like a maple seed, as it falls. But X shelved the gyrocopter, too, because it required four gallons of fuel a mile and, according to Teller, “it was louder than a Harley.”

NELSON TYLER, MAYMAN’S PARTNER in Jetpack Aviation Corp., first discovered jetpacks around 1945. He was lying in the back of his father’s car, listening to Buck Rogers on the radio when Rogers and his girlfriend emerged from a sleek spaceship in matching flying belts. “Forever it’s been burned in my mind,” he says.

Tyler, a sprightly 82-year-old with a halo of thick white hair, made a career inventing and operating mounts that keep movie cameras stable, mostly on helicopters—work that earned him three Academy Awards for technical achievement. He also invented an early jetski (called the Wetbike), a pressurized thermal airship and a remote-controlled bowling ball. But it’s the jetpack that has consumed most of his life and his passion.

In 1965, Tyler began hanging around Bill Suitor, an accomplished stunt pilot who was in Los Angeles for a series of promotional flights on a device known as “the Bell Aerospace Rocket.” Built by defense contractor Bell Aerosystems on a U.S. Army research grant, the rocket belt converted hydrogen peroxide into steam, which shot out of thin nozzles at supersonic speeds, burning through 47 pounds of fuel in less than 30 seconds of flight. Citing the short flight time, the military passed on the rocket belt, which became a stunt device for movies and live events, including the halftime of Super Bowl I and commercials for Pabst Blue Ribbon beer and Keds shoes.

“We were the shortest act in show business,” Suitor says.

The drafting desk of jetpack legend Nelson Tyler. ENLARGE
The drafting desk of jetpack legend Nelson Tyler. Photo: Dylan Coulter for The Wall Street Journal

Suitor was wary of Tyler at first. “I thought: This guy is a pain in the ass,” Suitor recalls. “He was there every day wanting to have his picture taken with it.” Suitor didn’t realize that Tyler was holding a small engineer’s scale alongside the belt as he photographed it, calculating its dimensions. Tyler used the photos to build his own rocket belt from scratch, and hired Suitor for flying lessons. For the next two decades, Tyler and Suitor flew the belt in movies and TV shows, such as “Newhart” and “The A-Team.” Shortly after Suitor flew at the 1984 Olympics, Tyler sold his rocket belt for $250,000 to the Copenhagen amusement park Tivoli Gardens.

“Think of the rocket belt as the ultimate drug,” Tyler says. “It makes you feel really good, but it only lasts 20 seconds. Now you’re hooked and it’s so much fun. I want that fun to last 10 minutes.”

Chasing his jetpack fix put Tyler on a crash course with David Mayman.

Mayman learned to fly in 1978 at age 15, before he could legally drive. He retired at 35, after selling a thriving mining-consulting firm and making a few successful bets on Australian Internet startups. He has swum beneath the ice off Antarctica and with great white sharks off the coast of Mexico. He skydives. He owns his own helicopter, which has left him unsatisfied. In a copter, he explains, “you’re surrounded by cockpits and windscreens and controls. I had a dream of being able to fly without any of that.” Mayman began traveling the world to find a turbine engine for a jetpack. In 2005, an engine maker in Cambridge, England, suggested that Mayman team up with Tyler, who had visited just weeks before. Tyler was skeptical when Mayman called him out of the blue. “So I said, ‘I’ll see you tomorrow, then,’” Mayman recalls. “And I jumped on a plane that day.” The two men met in Los Angeles, where Tyler laid out the structure of their venture. “I basically said, ‘You fund it. I’ll design it and build it,’” Tyler recalls.

Mayman traveled to Asia, the U.K., the Czech Republic and, finally, Geldrop, a town of 28,000 people in the Netherlands where a firm called AMT was selling a 25-pound turbine with 180 pounds of thrust—a compact but powerful engine intended for large drones. When a single turbine is attached to a person, its spinning blades create a so-called gyroscopic effect that pushes the pilot off course, so Mayman paid AMT an additional $100,000 to make a second engine—a mirror image of the first—that would cancel out the gyroscopics.

Some jetpack engineers say the key to Jetpack Aviation’s success is Mayman’s deep pockets. “It’s just a matter of massaging the right company or having enough money,” says Nino Amarena, an engineer for a surgical-robotics firm in Sunnyvale, Calif., who built and flew his own rocket belt. Amarena has been trying to build a jet-turbine pack for years but can’t find an engine. “I’m always hoping that somebody’s going to put a Tomahawk missile engine on eBay EBAY 0.41 % and I’m going to be the first one that sees it,” he says. He has set up eBay alerts.

It took a decade, but at 7 a.m. on a Sunday in July last year, Mayman flew a few laps above a pond outside Sacramento, Calif., leaving a wake in the water from his exhaust. “I like to call that place our little Kitty Hawk,” says Stefano Paris, a Jetpack Aviation AeroMechanical engineer, referring to where the Wright brothers first flew their plane. “We knew it was going to be spectacular, but we had no idea how spectacular.”

The Jetpack Aviation production factory in Van Nuys, Calif. ENLARGE
The Jetpack Aviation production factory in Van Nuys, Calif. Photo: Dylan Coulter for The Wall Street Journal

Mayman and Tyler then decided to reveal the jetpack to the public in a flight over New York’s Hudson River. “When I saw the thing, I near soiled my armor,” says Suitor, the former Bell rocket-belt pilot, who watched from a barge. “He was flying away with my dream.”

Federal Aviation Administration officials were also on hand. “The mission was a complete success,” an official wrote to Mayman after the flight. “I do believe that Lady Liberty was smiling during one of your passes; she who had witnessed vessels of antiquity.” Such a compliment reflects the relatively easy pass FAA officials have given jetpacks so far. The agency deemed them “ultralight vehicles,” which don’t require aircraft certifications or pilot licenses. If jetpacks hit the mainstream, however, that stance may change. The FAA largely ignored model aircraft for decades until sensors and computer chips made them far smaller and easier to fly. The FAA now has more rules for operating a three-pound electric drone than an 85-pound jetpack.

Mayman and Tyler hope to bring their jetpack to market, but which market they plan to pursue is still unclear. Applications that jetpack advocates often discuss—inspecting pipelines, search and rescue—can be done by drones for less money and with less noise. Mayman and Tyler have talked with filmmakers about using their device in movies, and with a sports marketer about sponsoring a series of jetpack races. They’re also betting on wealthy thrill-seekers. “Every rich guy needs one of everything,” Tyler says.

JetPack Aviation may also have a shot at a U.S. military contract. According to Mayman and Tyler, they were contacted a few days after the New York flight by a secretive branch of the military, which flew the pair and their jetpack to an oceanside military base, where Mayman gave a flight demonstration. Mayman and Tyler say the military is interested in jetpacks for so-called extraction situations, where a soldier needs to be rescued from behind enemy lines. Military officials thought the jetpack might also be useful for incursion, until they heard its awful din. Mayman recalled that when the jetpack started, an officer said, “I guess we won’t be surprising anyone.” Jetpack Aviation now has a research-and-development agreement with the U.S. Special Operations Command, and it is developing a four-turbine jetpack that will lift twice the weight—up to about 700 pounds—and require twice the fuel.

For now, the jetpack’s most practical application is drawing eyes on YouTube. “This was all for fun,” Tyler says, while leaning on a truck bed during the test flights. “Now we want to get it to the point where we can sell it. But we won’t sell it until it’s perfect—and perfect costs money.”

Driving back from the test flights, with the sun setting on the Santa Susana Mountains, Mayman reflected on how, after 15 years, jetpacks had gone from his frivolous hobby to a life goal. “It’s not like we desperately need the money,” he said. “It’s really sort of a legacy. To say, ‘Hey, we were there. We were the guys that built that.’”

Write to Jack Nicas at [email protected]

62 comments
Mark Stamp
Mark Stamp subscriber

It's difficult to make predictions, especially about the future. But, I'd venture to guess that these will become popular about the same time as flying cars.

Geraldo Bustone
Geraldo Bustone user

@Mark Stamp That should make it interesting when a flying car hits a jet pack "pedestrian".  I wonder where he will fall?  Will there be designated crosswalks?  Tickets for Jay-packing?

J. Kirtland
J. Kirtland subscriber

In 1965, the Bell Rocket Belt worked flawlessly for James Bond (although, he had a flight of fewer than 25secs.)  

Geraldo Bustone
Geraldo Bustone user

@J. Kirtland The Aston Martin didn't work as well.  He and his buddy were driving into town for a few beers.  It was warm that night so James decided to turn the AC on.  Sadly, the electrical system had been installed by the ACME electrical company (see Wile E. Coyote).  The liability case was tied up in the courts for years.

Steven Sandys
Steven Sandys subscriber

Hey!! Look who dropped in for dinner! Literally...

ROBERT FEIT
ROBERT FEIT subscriber

Jet packs should certainly be given wide authorization, but only if there is a 12 month hunting season open for anyone with a firearm.

ELTON TENG
ELTON TENG subscriber

It's great as long as you don't have dead bodies littering the earth due to malfunctioning units.

Rohit Parikh
Rohit Parikh subscriber

Personal flight is within reach for the rich!

NORD CHRISTENSEN
NORD CHRISTENSEN subscriber

I'd settle for the autogyro in It Happened One Night (1934).

Fred Upchurch
Fred Upchurch subscriber

Bring on the jet backpacks with the helicopter blades on top! I was ready back in 1959. A Popular Mechanics Magazine cover of that year featured a smiling father (with briefcase, wearing a suit and hat) landing in his backyard, his kids waving. No superhero garb required.


Back then, articles in PM and others also spoke of 'atomic' power that would be so inexpensive that homes would not even need power meters. This was only a little after the popular Age of Moving Sidewalks in stories about the near (present!) future. The late great R.A. Heinlein and many other writers was especially enthused, as were many others.


The giant problem with predicting the future is that the future hasn't happened yet.  The developments that make up the future cannot be extrapolated linearly based on past progress event-lines.  Unless it happens anyway. And you can take that to the bank.


Put me on the waiting list!


Yowza, ya'll.



Michael Selden
Michael Selden subscriber

It's all about energy density. It may well be that an improved solid oxide fuel cell combined with normal fuels (like gasoline) and an electric motor might do the trick, but we keep wasting our time and money on lithium batteries.

Earl Jacksboro
Earl Jacksboro subscriber

"There will always be a limited market for lame ideas like this."
     (P. T. Barnum is said to have made a similar statement.)

John Paul Harmon
John Paul Harmon subscriber

It is revealing that the guys mentioned in the article are old.  


Motorcycle sales are dwindling off into oblivion.  The Mustang V8 is purchased by a 50 year old man on average.  Almost the same for the Corvette.  Football is beginning to disappear as a sport in Jr High and High School.  Why?  Because young men (under 50!) have socialized since they were 40 lbs, sitting in car seats, to be careful, not to take risks, to be quiet, to be... predictable.  


There is no market for this thing because there are few young men who want to fly high, fly fast, and fly loud.  Because its fun.

Domingo Trassens
Domingo Trassens subscriber

The "jetpack" (machine to propel human into the air) is a future that requests a long path to be a daily reality.

Chris Niebergall
Chris Niebergall subscriber

It might be amusing to see millionaires falling from the sky when the proposed chutes fail.  Question is, on whose head will they land. 

I propose Hillary as a test pilot.

Charlie Mongoho
Charlie Mongoho subscriber

$250,000. Affordability may be an issue in the short term. When Chinese start making them the price may come down and the market may expand....

Richard Lentz
Richard Lentz subscriber

What will our federal nannies have to say about this?

Denise Di Salvo
Denise Di Salvo subscriber

It's good it can carry 700 pounds, because that's how much everyone will weigh when they start using these things to get from the couch to the refrigerator. 


I can't wait for the first mid-air collision.  Do these things have blinkers? 


Jim McMenamin
Jim McMenamin subscriber

What? No mention of the rock band We Were Promised Jetpacks?  One of their songs is titled "An Almighty Thud."  

Steve Bausch
Steve Bausch subscriber

Wasn't there some skullduggery with a missing jetpack?

Tony Carlos
Tony Carlos subscriber

If you're trying to convince the public of the viability and safety of your invention, having a tether on your PR flight doesn't help.

Ronald Howell
Ronald Howell subscriber

@Terry Traub @Tony Carlos I would imagine it will be fun watching the parachute feature initial proving flights!

Hope the test pilot's life insurance is fully paid up!!

Terry Traub
Terry Traub subscriber

@Ronald Howell  It's hard to imagine being granted a policy once they know what your profession is.  Or maybe it would cost $1000/month.  I suppose this is "fixable" by passing ObamaLife, then everyone pays the same.

Jack Armstrong
Jack Armstrong subscriber

Here is a picture of it flying in a manufacturer's brochure for sale on ebay.  At night, you could see a hemisphere of fire rising above it from the pulse engines on the blade.  And those pulse engines would have made it sound like a buzz bomb going by.  Not too stealthy, but very cool.


http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/EboAAOSw1ZBUucN2/s-l1600.jpg

Dennis Carlyle
Dennis Carlyle subscriber

"A machine powerful enough to propel a human into the air long enough to cover their [sic] commute."


What has happened to grammar?

Eddy Robinson
Eddy Robinson user

@Dennis Carlyle Nothing. 'Singular they' is a valid grammatical construct, long in use in the UK and other parts of the Anglosphere and gaining popularity in the US, as it is more efficient than writing 'him or her' in sentences like this.

Jack Armstrong
Jack Armstrong subscriber

The inventor should probably leave out the "if it fails you die!" line when making his pitch. 


On the plus side, it has to be cheaper to operate and maintain than a helicopter.

I wonder what limits the range.  A bigger fuel tank may be too heavy to carry, but if it gets you to work and back, who cares?


DAVID BENSON
DAVID BENSON subscriber

I'm surprised there was no mention of the water powered jetpacks that have been out there for a while now. Yes, they're different, and effectively tethered to the water, but same flight sensation for low cost and noice.


Susan Corwin
Susan Corwin subscriber

The issue is that they are trying to apply "old" technology to wishful thinking.

It is like someone in the mid-1800's trying to build a personal surface transportation vehicle
......i.e. "car" or "automobile"
out of the technology available: coal, steam engines, whale oil.

The solution isn't to run into the wall at full speed,
we need a different technology which may or may not exist.

So the question for today is:
....what, in the 3 dimension+time membrane of the universe,
......add other accessible dimensions as needed,
....is this "stable subatomic particle with a charge of negative electricity"
......that we call an "electron"?

Frank Mostek
Frank Mostek subscriber

@Susan Corwin  agree - like the land rovers in star wars.  it would be nice if we learn how gravity actually works...

George Lewis
George Lewis subscriber

@Frank Mostek @Susan Corwin That's actually truer than most people know. Like so much is science, we know very well what it does and how to measure it, but we really don't know what gravity "is"...gravitons are only a hypothesis. 


I agree..we need to focus on understanding how to manipulate gravity itself....then we can really do some interesting things.

douglas watts
douglas watts subscriber

Look at the upside, if you live in California you could possibly roast some nuts upon landing.

douglas watts
douglas watts subscriber

Single person helicopters are a bunch cheaper than 1/4 million.

Bill Weronko
Bill Weronko subscriber

The reason you'll never see these jet packs in any numbers is they are inherently unsafe and can never be made safe. 

Show More Archives
Advertisement

Popular on WSJ

Editors’ Picks