Alan Dershowitz已認證帳戶

@AlanDersh

Professor at Harvard Law School for 50 years, now emeritus. Active in litigation, writing, and defense of civil liberties and human rights.

Cambridge, MA
2011年9月加入
35 個相片或影片 圖片與影片

推文

你已封鎖 @AlanDersh

你確定要查看這些推文嗎？查看推文並不會將 @AlanDersh 解除封鎖

  1. 22 小時前

    49 replies 103 則轉推 387 個喜歡
    還原
  2. 23 小時前

    It is McCarthyism to accuse a lawyer of dirt for representing a despised client. That’s exactly what Joe Mccarthy used to do. Do you want us to back to that terrible time?

    You were ’s lawyer. You agreed to represent him. Too late to shake off the dirt.
    481 replies 1,014 則轉推 4,729 個喜歡
    還原
  3. 23 小時前

    I’m sure you would have favored a right of reply by Hillary Clinton to Comey’s expression of his critical views. 2/2

    35 replies 61 則轉推 535 個喜歡
    顯示此對話串
    顯示此對話串
    還原
  4. 23 小時前

    If a prosecutor indicts/announces that he won’t indict, there's no need for a simultaneous rebuttal. But if a prosecutor publishes his critical views beyond that, fairness dictates a right of reply.1/2

    . is way off base. Nobody has a “due process” right to counter a detailed indictment with a “simultaneous” rebuttal: a right to rebut comes later, at trial in court. If Trump is immune to indictment, that right comes later, at a Senate trial if and when he’s impeached.
    52 replies 134 則轉推 555 個喜歡
    顯示此對話串
    顯示此對話串
    還原
  5. 2月22日

    The judge did not find that the non-prosecution agreement or plea bargain broke any rules. That is all I was involved with as Epstein’s defense lawyer.

    3,037 replies 535 則轉推 2,873 個喜歡
    還原
  6. 2月16日

    Congress has authority to rescind Tump emergency. It can amend emergency power law to exclude expenditures not authorized by Congress. It will take bipartisan support but Trump is circumventing constitutional grant of power to congress to authorize expenditures.

    715 replies 421 則轉推 1,672 個喜歡
    還原
  7. 2月15日

    It is unconstitutional to use the 25th Amendment to circumvent impeachment provisions. The 25th can be used only if POTUS is physically or psychiatrically incapacitated. Any other use is unconstitutional. I challenge anyone to argue differently.

    12,493 replies 16,648 則轉推 48,228 個喜歡
    還原
  8. 2月15日

    Let’s assume the president of the United States was in bed with the Russians, committed treason, committed obstruction of justice. The 25th Amendment is simply irrelevant to that.

    426 replies 702 則轉推 3,018 個喜歡
    還原
  9. 2月11日

    Investigating the National Enquirer for extortion raises concerns regarding the First Amendment which needs breathing room and applies equally to tabloids and to the Times. See attached abc interview.

    343 replies 262 則轉推 865 個喜歡
    還原
  10. 2月8日

    I’m waiting to read attacks on the next Dem. president whose investigated by a special counsel and his defense of that special counsel. I suspect he'll be silent. His critiques are all partisan. He fails the shoe on the other foot test of morality and equal justice

    CONCLUSION/ I've *never* said—and would *never* say—I'm the only attorney folks should read. Read *all* the attorneys and investigators—even read , who's disagreed with by the rest of us. But if you're quoting Trump Jr. on a complex federal investigation, grow up. /end
    顯示此對話串
    658 replies 579 則轉推 2,135 個喜歡
    還原
  11. 2月7日

    I’m pleased that there will be a full investigation which will prove that the accusations against me were made up for financial reasons. I will fully cooperate with the investigation because I have nothing to hide.

    600 replies 1,743 則轉推 5,474 個喜歡
    還原
  12. 2月6日

    Henry Ford devoted his life to two passions: making cars and demonizing Jews.

    291 replies 447 則轉推 1,260 個喜歡
    還原
  13. 2月5日

    I also wish he would pass the shoe on the other foot test: would he tweeting as much and as angrily if Clinton has been elected and these tactics were being used against her? I leave that to the readers to judge. FINAL/

    126 replies 326 則轉推 1,782 個喜歡
    顯示此對話串
    顯示此對話串
    還原
  14. 2月5日

    I just wish he were not so results oriented in his get-Trump-at-any-cost approach regardless of the implications for civil liberties. 3/

    38 replies 209 則轉推 1,378 個喜歡
    顯示此對話串
    顯示此對話串
    還原
  15. 2月5日

    If after completing his investigation, Mueller comes up with no one in this core category, will admit I make an important point? Im sure Abramson deserved his grade and I commend him for thinking for himself. 2/

    27 replies 162 則轉推 722 個喜歡
    顯示此對話串
    顯示此對話串
    還原
  16. 2月5日

    In his multiple tweets, avoids responding to my challenge: name one American who Mueller has charged with unlawfully conspiring with Russia to influence the 2016 election. I have patience. 1/

    (THREAD) To his credit, likes a spirited debate as much as I do. So here is "Round 2" of our debate on whether Robert Mueller is the most professional, admirable, and successful federal prosecutor of this century thus far—which he is. I hope you'll read on and retweet.
    顯示此對話串
    301 replies 1,924 則轉推 4,949 個喜歡
    顯示此對話串
    顯示此對話串
    還原
  17. 2月5日

    This misrepresents my feelings on the matter. I have written that process crimes are “serious” but they are secondary to Mueller's primary mandate.

    154 replies 291 則轉推 1,480 個喜歡
    還原
  18. 2月2日

    Some of my highest grades were given to students who fundamentally disagreed w/ me. Abramson is projecting how he evaluates facts & arguments. If you agree politically you “find” the law and facts differently than if you disagree. That’s not the way I evaluate students or issues.

    94 replies 115 則轉推 840 個喜歡
    顯示此對話串
    顯示此對話串
    還原
  19. 2月2日

    Abramson concluded his screed with a lie that typifies his mendacious approach to “facts.” He suspects that I gave him a good grade “because he felt I think as he does.” Anyone who knows me can attest that I would never grade based on whether a student thinks as I do. 7/

    40 replies 101 則轉推 724 個喜歡
    顯示此對話串
    顯示此對話串
    還原
  20. 2月2日

    I challenge him to dispute this pattern in which “nearly all” of the charges “fall into 3 categories.” I urge all readers to read the attached article to determine whether he has fairly represented my actual argument, or has instead constructed a strawman

    28 replies 124 則轉推 363 個喜歡
    顯示此對話串
    顯示此對話串
    還原

@AlanDersh 尚未發表任何推文。

看來要一段時間讀取資料。

Twitter 可能已超出負載，或發生暫時性的小問題。請再試一次，或造訪 Twitter 狀態以取得更多資訊。

    你也可能也會喜歡

    ·