Alan DershowitzVerifierat konto

@AlanDersh

Professor at Harvard Law School for 50 years, now emeritus. Active in litigation, writing, and defense of civil liberties and human rights.

Cambridge, MA
Gått med september 2011
35 Foton och videor Foton och videor

Tweets

Du blockerade @AlanDersh

Är du säker på att du vill visa dessa Tweets? Visning av Tweets kommer inte att häva blockeringen av @AlanDersh

  1. för 22 timmar sedan

    49 svar 103 retweets 387 gillanden
    Ångra
  2. för 23 timmar sedan

    It is McCarthyism to accuse a lawyer of dirt for representing a despised client. That’s exactly what Joe Mccarthy used to do. Do you want us to back to that terrible time?

    You were ’s lawyer. You agreed to represent him. Too late to shake off the dirt.
    481 svar 1 014 retweets 4 731 gillanden
    Ångra
  3. för 23 timmar sedan

    I’m sure you would have favored a right of reply by Hillary Clinton to Comey’s expression of his critical views. 2/2

    35 svar 61 retweets 536 gillanden
    Visa denna tråd
    Visa denna tråd
    Ångra
  4. för 23 timmar sedan

    If a prosecutor indicts/announces that he won’t indict, there's no need for a simultaneous rebuttal. But if a prosecutor publishes his critical views beyond that, fairness dictates a right of reply.1/2

    . is way off base. Nobody has a “due process” right to counter a detailed indictment with a “simultaneous” rebuttal: a right to rebut comes later, at trial in court. If Trump is immune to indictment, that right comes later, at a Senate trial if and when he’s impeached.
    52 svar 134 retweets 556 gillanden
    Visa denna tråd
    Visa denna tråd
    Ångra
  5. 22 feb.

    The judge did not find that the non-prosecution agreement or plea bargain broke any rules. That is all I was involved with as Epstein’s defense lawyer.

    3 037 svar 535 retweets 2 873 gillanden
    Ångra
  6. 16 feb.

    Congress has authority to rescind Tump emergency. It can amend emergency power law to exclude expenditures not authorized by Congress. It will take bipartisan support but Trump is circumventing constitutional grant of power to congress to authorize expenditures.

    715 svar 421 retweets 1 672 gillanden
    Ångra
  7. 15 feb.

    It is unconstitutional to use the 25th Amendment to circumvent impeachment provisions. The 25th can be used only if POTUS is physically or psychiatrically incapacitated. Any other use is unconstitutional. I challenge anyone to argue differently.

    12 493 svar 16 648 retweets 48 228 gillanden
    Ångra
  8. 15 feb.

    Let’s assume the president of the United States was in bed with the Russians, committed treason, committed obstruction of justice. The 25th Amendment is simply irrelevant to that.

    426 svar 702 retweets 3 018 gillanden
    Ångra
  9. 11 feb.

    Investigating the National Enquirer for extortion raises concerns regarding the First Amendment which needs breathing room and applies equally to tabloids and to the Times. See attached abc interview.

    343 svar 262 retweets 865 gillanden
    Ångra
  10. 8 feb.

    I’m waiting to read attacks on the next Dem. president whose investigated by a special counsel and his defense of that special counsel. I suspect he'll be silent. His critiques are all partisan. He fails the shoe on the other foot test of morality and equal justice

    CONCLUSION/ I've *never* said—and would *never* say—I'm the only attorney folks should read. Read *all* the attorneys and investigators—even read , who's disagreed with by the rest of us. But if you're quoting Trump Jr. on a complex federal investigation, grow up. /end
    Visa denna tråd
    658 svar 579 retweets 2 135 gillanden
    Ångra
  11. 7 feb.

    I’m pleased that there will be a full investigation which will prove that the accusations against me were made up for financial reasons. I will fully cooperate with the investigation because I have nothing to hide.

    600 svar 1 743 retweets 5 474 gillanden
    Ångra
  12. 6 feb.

    Henry Ford devoted his life to two passions: making cars and demonizing Jews.

    291 svar 447 retweets 1 260 gillanden
    Ångra
  13. 5 feb.

    I also wish he would pass the shoe on the other foot test: would he tweeting as much and as angrily if Clinton has been elected and these tactics were being used against her? I leave that to the readers to judge. FINAL/

    126 svar 326 retweets 1 782 gillanden
    Visa denna tråd
    Visa denna tråd
    Ångra
  14. 5 feb.

    I just wish he were not so results oriented in his get-Trump-at-any-cost approach regardless of the implications for civil liberties. 3/

    38 svar 209 retweets 1 378 gillanden
    Visa denna tråd
    Visa denna tråd
    Ångra
  15. 5 feb.

    If after completing his investigation, Mueller comes up with no one in this core category, will admit I make an important point? Im sure Abramson deserved his grade and I commend him for thinking for himself. 2/

    27 svar 162 retweets 722 gillanden
    Visa denna tråd
    Visa denna tråd
    Ångra
  16. 5 feb.

    In his multiple tweets, avoids responding to my challenge: name one American who Mueller has charged with unlawfully conspiring with Russia to influence the 2016 election. I have patience. 1/

    (THREAD) To his credit, likes a spirited debate as much as I do. So here is "Round 2" of our debate on whether Robert Mueller is the most professional, admirable, and successful federal prosecutor of this century thus far—which he is. I hope you'll read on and retweet.
    Visa denna tråd
    301 svar 1 924 retweets 4 949 gillanden
    Visa denna tråd
    Visa denna tråd
    Ångra
  17. 5 feb.

    This misrepresents my feelings on the matter. I have written that process crimes are “serious” but they are secondary to Mueller's primary mandate.

    154 svar 291 retweets 1 480 gillanden
    Ångra
  18. 2 feb.

    Some of my highest grades were given to students who fundamentally disagreed w/ me. Abramson is projecting how he evaluates facts & arguments. If you agree politically you “find” the law and facts differently than if you disagree. That’s not the way I evaluate students or issues.

    94 svar 115 retweets 840 gillanden
    Visa denna tråd
    Visa denna tråd
    Ångra
  19. 2 feb.

    Abramson concluded his screed with a lie that typifies his mendacious approach to “facts.” He suspects that I gave him a good grade “because he felt I think as he does.” Anyone who knows me can attest that I would never grade based on whether a student thinks as I do. 7/

    40 svar 101 retweets 724 gillanden
    Visa denna tråd
    Visa denna tråd
    Ångra
  20. 2 feb.

    I challenge him to dispute this pattern in which “nearly all” of the charges “fall into 3 categories.” I urge all readers to read the attached article to determine whether he has fairly represented my actual argument, or has instead constructed a strawman

    28 svar 124 retweets 363 gillanden
    Visa denna tråd
    Visa denna tråd
    Ångra

@AlanDersh har inte Tweetat än.

Hämtningen verkar ta ett tag

Twitter kan vara överbelastat eller ha tillfälliga problem. Försök igen eller besök Twitter Status om du vill ha mer information.

    Du kanske också gillar

    ·