Alan Dershowitzحساب موثّق

@AlanDersh

Professor at Harvard Law School for 50 years, now emeritus. Active in litigation, writing, and defense of civil liberties and human rights.

Cambridge, MA
انضم في سبتمبر ٢٠١١
٣٥ صور أو مقاطع فيديو الصور والفيديو

التغريدات

قمت بحظر @AlanDersh

هل أنت متأكّد أنك تريد عرض هذه التغريدات؟ عرض التغريدات لن يلغي حظر @AlanDersh

  1. قبل ٢٢ ساعة

    ٤٩ ردود ١٠٣ إعادات تغريد ٣٨٦ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  2. قبل ٢٣ ساعة

    It is McCarthyism to accuse a lawyer of dirt for representing a despised client. That’s exactly what Joe Mccarthy used to do. Do you want us to back to that terrible time?

    You were ’s lawyer. You agreed to represent him. Too late to shake off the dirt.
    ٤٨١ ردود ١٬٠١٣ إعادات تغريد ٤٬٧٢٧ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  3. قبل ٢٣ ساعة

    I’m sure you would have favored a right of reply by Hillary Clinton to Comey’s expression of his critical views. 2/2

    ٣٥ ردود ٦١ إعادات تغريد ٥٣٥ إعجاب
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    تراجع عن
  4. قبل ٢٣ ساعة

    If a prosecutor indicts/announces that he won’t indict, there's no need for a simultaneous rebuttal. But if a prosecutor publishes his critical views beyond that, fairness dictates a right of reply.1/2

    . is way off base. Nobody has a “due process” right to counter a detailed indictment with a “simultaneous” rebuttal: a right to rebut comes later, at trial in court. If Trump is immune to indictment, that right comes later, at a Senate trial if and when he’s impeached.
    ٥٢ ردود ١٣٤ إعادات تغريد ٥٥٥ إعجاب
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    تراجع عن
  5. ٢٢ فبراير

    The judge did not find that the non-prosecution agreement or plea bargain broke any rules. That is all I was involved with as Epstein’s defense lawyer.

    ٣٬٠٣٧ ردود ٥٣٥ إعادات تغريد ٢٬٨٧٣ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  6. ١٦ فبراير

    Congress has authority to rescind Tump emergency. It can amend emergency power law to exclude expenditures not authorized by Congress. It will take bipartisan support but Trump is circumventing constitutional grant of power to congress to authorize expenditures.

    ٧١٥ ردود ٤٢١ إعادات تغريد ١٬٦٧٢ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  7. ١٥ فبراير

    It is unconstitutional to use the 25th Amendment to circumvent impeachment provisions. The 25th can be used only if POTUS is physically or psychiatrically incapacitated. Any other use is unconstitutional. I challenge anyone to argue differently.

    ١٢٬٤٩٣ ردود ١٦٬٦٤٨ إعادات تغريد ٤٨٬٢٢٨ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  8. ١٥ فبراير

    Let’s assume the president of the United States was in bed with the Russians, committed treason, committed obstruction of justice. The 25th Amendment is simply irrelevant to that.

    ٤٢٦ ردود ٧٠٢ إعادة تغريد{/intnumber_other}} ٣٬٠١٨ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  9. ١١ فبراير

    Investigating the National Enquirer for extortion raises concerns regarding the First Amendment which needs breathing room and applies equally to tabloids and to the Times. See attached abc interview.

    ٣٤٣ ردود ٢٦٢ إعادات تغريد ٨٦٥ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  10. ٨ فبراير

    I’m waiting to read attacks on the next Dem. president whose investigated by a special counsel and his defense of that special counsel. I suspect he'll be silent. His critiques are all partisan. He fails the shoe on the other foot test of morality and equal justice

    CONCLUSION/ I've *never* said—and would *never* say—I'm the only attorney folks should read. Read *all* the attorneys and investigators—even read , who's disagreed with by the rest of us. But if you're quoting Trump Jr. on a complex federal investigation, grow up. /end
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    ٦٥٨ ردود ٥٧٩ إعادات تغريد ٢٬١٣٥ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  11. ٧ فبراير

    I’m pleased that there will be a full investigation which will prove that the accusations against me were made up for financial reasons. I will fully cooperate with the investigation because I have nothing to hide.

    ٦٠٠ ردًّا{/intnumber_other}} ١٬٧٤٣ إعادات تغريد ٥٬٤٧٤ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  12. ٦ فبراير

    Henry Ford devoted his life to two passions: making cars and demonizing Jews.

    ٢٩١ ردود ٤٤٧ إعادات تغريد ١٬٢٦٠ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  13. ٥ فبراير

    I also wish he would pass the shoe on the other foot test: would he tweeting as much and as angrily if Clinton has been elected and these tactics were being used against her? I leave that to the readers to judge. FINAL/

    ١٢٦ ردود ٣٢٦ إعادات تغريد ١٬٧٨٢ إعجاب
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    تراجع عن
  14. ٥ فبراير

    I just wish he were not so results oriented in his get-Trump-at-any-cost approach regardless of the implications for civil liberties. 3/

    ٣٨ ردود ٢٠٩ إعادات تغريد ١٬٣٧٨ إعجاب
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    تراجع عن
  15. ٥ فبراير

    If after completing his investigation, Mueller comes up with no one in this core category, will admit I make an important point? Im sure Abramson deserved his grade and I commend him for thinking for himself. 2/

    ٢٧ ردود ١٦٢ إعادات تغريد ٧٢٢ إعجاب
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    تراجع عن
  16. ٥ فبراير

    In his multiple tweets, avoids responding to my challenge: name one American who Mueller has charged with unlawfully conspiring with Russia to influence the 2016 election. I have patience. 1/

    (THREAD) To his credit, likes a spirited debate as much as I do. So here is "Round 2" of our debate on whether Robert Mueller is the most professional, admirable, and successful federal prosecutor of this century thus far—which he is. I hope you'll read on and retweet.
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    ٣٠١ ردًّا{/intnumber_other}} ١٬٩٢٤ إعادات تغريد ٤٬٩٤٩ إعجاب
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    تراجع عن
  17. ٥ فبراير

    This misrepresents my feelings on the matter. I have written that process crimes are “serious” but they are secondary to Mueller's primary mandate.

    ١٥٤ ردود ٢٩١ إعادات تغريد ١٬٤٨٠ إعجاب
    تراجع عن
  18. ٢ فبراير

    Some of my highest grades were given to students who fundamentally disagreed w/ me. Abramson is projecting how he evaluates facts & arguments. If you agree politically you “find” the law and facts differently than if you disagree. That’s not the way I evaluate students or issues.

    ٩٤ ردود ١١٥ إعادات تغريد ٨٤٠ إعجاب
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    تراجع عن
  19. ٢ فبراير

    Abramson concluded his screed with a lie that typifies his mendacious approach to “facts.” He suspects that I gave him a good grade “because he felt I think as he does.” Anyone who knows me can attest that I would never grade based on whether a student thinks as I do. 7/

    ٤٠ ردود ١٠١ إعادة تغريد{/intnumber_other}} ٧٢٤ إعجاب
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    تراجع عن
  20. ٢ فبراير

    I challenge him to dispute this pattern in which “nearly all” of the charges “fall into 3 categories.” I urge all readers to read the attached article to determine whether he has fairly represented my actual argument, or has instead constructed a strawman

    ٢٨ ردود ١٢٤ إعادات تغريد ٣٦٣ إعجاب
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    عرض هذه السلسلة
    تراجع عن

@AlanDersh لم يغرّد حتى الآن.

يبدو أن التحميل يستغرق بعض الوقت.

ربّما يعاني تويتر من الحمل الزائد أو يواجه عطلًا مؤقّتًا. حاول مجدّدًا أو تفقّد حالة تويتر لمزيد من المعلومات.

    قد يعجبك أيضًا

    ·