Alan Dershowitz인증된 계정

@AlanDersh

Professor at Harvard Law School for 50 years, now emeritus. Active in litigation, writing, and defense of civil liberties and human rights.

Cambridge, MA
가입일: 2011년 9월
사진 및 동영상 35개 사진과 동영상

트윗

@AlanDersh 님을 차단했습니다

정말로 이 트윗을 보시겠어요? 트윗을 봐도 @AlanDersh 님의 차단을 해제하지 않습니다

  1. 22시간 전

    답글 49개 리트윗 103개 387 마음
    취소
  2. 23시간 전

    It is McCarthyism to accuse a lawyer of dirt for representing a despised client. That’s exactly what Joe Mccarthy used to do. Do you want us to back to that terrible time?

    You were ’s lawyer. You agreed to represent him. Too late to shake off the dirt.
    답글 481개 리트윗 1,014개 4,729 마음
    취소
  3. 23시간 전

    I’m sure you would have favored a right of reply by Hillary Clinton to Comey’s expression of his critical views. 2/2

    답글 35개 리트윗 61개 535 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  4. 23시간 전

    If a prosecutor indicts/announces that he won’t indict, there's no need for a simultaneous rebuttal. But if a prosecutor publishes his critical views beyond that, fairness dictates a right of reply.1/2

    . is way off base. Nobody has a “due process” right to counter a detailed indictment with a “simultaneous” rebuttal: a right to rebut comes later, at trial in court. If Trump is immune to indictment, that right comes later, at a Senate trial if and when he’s impeached.
    답글 52개 리트윗 134개 555 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  5. 2월 22일

    The judge did not find that the non-prosecution agreement or plea bargain broke any rules. That is all I was involved with as Epstein’s defense lawyer.

    답글 3,037개 리트윗 535개 2,873 마음
    취소
  6. 2월 16일

    Congress has authority to rescind Tump emergency. It can amend emergency power law to exclude expenditures not authorized by Congress. It will take bipartisan support but Trump is circumventing constitutional grant of power to congress to authorize expenditures.

    답글 715개 리트윗 421개 1,672 마음
    취소
  7. 2월 15일

    It is unconstitutional to use the 25th Amendment to circumvent impeachment provisions. The 25th can be used only if POTUS is physically or psychiatrically incapacitated. Any other use is unconstitutional. I challenge anyone to argue differently.

    답글 12,493개 리트윗 16,648개 48,228 마음
    취소
  8. 2월 15일

    Let’s assume the president of the United States was in bed with the Russians, committed treason, committed obstruction of justice. The 25th Amendment is simply irrelevant to that.

    답글 426개 리트윗 702개 3,018 마음
    취소
  9. 2월 11일

    Investigating the National Enquirer for extortion raises concerns regarding the First Amendment which needs breathing room and applies equally to tabloids and to the Times. See attached abc interview.

    답글 343개 리트윗 262개 865 마음
    취소
  10. 2월 8일

    I’m waiting to read attacks on the next Dem. president whose investigated by a special counsel and his defense of that special counsel. I suspect he'll be silent. His critiques are all partisan. He fails the shoe on the other foot test of morality and equal justice

    CONCLUSION/ I've *never* said—and would *never* say—I'm the only attorney folks should read. Read *all* the attorneys and investigators—even read , who's disagreed with by the rest of us. But if you're quoting Trump Jr. on a complex federal investigation, grow up. /end
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 658개 리트윗 579개 2,135 마음
    취소
  11. 2월 7일

    I’m pleased that there will be a full investigation which will prove that the accusations against me were made up for financial reasons. I will fully cooperate with the investigation because I have nothing to hide.

    답글 600개 리트윗 1,743개 5,474 마음
    취소
  12. 2월 6일

    Henry Ford devoted his life to two passions: making cars and demonizing Jews.

    답글 291개 리트윗 447개 1,260 마음
    취소
  13. 2월 5일

    I also wish he would pass the shoe on the other foot test: would he tweeting as much and as angrily if Clinton has been elected and these tactics were being used against her? I leave that to the readers to judge. FINAL/

    답글 126개 리트윗 326개 1,782 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  14. 2월 5일

    I just wish he were not so results oriented in his get-Trump-at-any-cost approach regardless of the implications for civil liberties. 3/

    답글 38개 리트윗 209개 1,378 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  15. 2월 5일

    If after completing his investigation, Mueller comes up with no one in this core category, will admit I make an important point? Im sure Abramson deserved his grade and I commend him for thinking for himself. 2/

    답글 27개 리트윗 162개 722 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  16. 2월 5일

    In his multiple tweets, avoids responding to my challenge: name one American who Mueller has charged with unlawfully conspiring with Russia to influence the 2016 election. I have patience. 1/

    (THREAD) To his credit, likes a spirited debate as much as I do. So here is "Round 2" of our debate on whether Robert Mueller is the most professional, admirable, and successful federal prosecutor of this century thus far—which he is. I hope you'll read on and retweet.
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 301개 리트윗 1,924개 4,949 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  17. 2월 5일

    This misrepresents my feelings on the matter. I have written that process crimes are “serious” but they are secondary to Mueller's primary mandate.

    답글 154개 리트윗 291개 1,480 마음
    취소
  18. 2월 2일

    Some of my highest grades were given to students who fundamentally disagreed w/ me. Abramson is projecting how he evaluates facts & arguments. If you agree politically you “find” the law and facts differently than if you disagree. That’s not the way I evaluate students or issues.

    답글 94개 리트윗 115개 840 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  19. 2월 2일

    Abramson concluded his screed with a lie that typifies his mendacious approach to “facts.” He suspects that I gave him a good grade “because he felt I think as he does.” Anyone who knows me can attest that I would never grade based on whether a student thinks as I do. 7/

    답글 40개 리트윗 101개 724 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  20. 2월 2일

    I challenge him to dispute this pattern in which “nearly all” of the charges “fall into 3 categories.” I urge all readers to read the attached article to determine whether he has fairly represented my actual argument, or has instead constructed a strawman

    답글 28개 리트윗 124개 363 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소

@AlanDersh 님은 아직 트윗이 없습니다.

로딩하는데 시간이 지연되고 있습니다.

트위터의 트래픽이 폭주했거나 일시적인 문제가 발생했을 수 있습니다. 다시 시도하거나 트위터 상태 페이지를 방문하여 자세한 내용을 확인해 보세요.

    관심사 추천:

    ·