Repeal the NFA and other Unconstitutional Firearm Restrictions: Defend your Natural Rights by DaSquariusGreen in The_Donald

[–]DaSquariusGreen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aside from being one of the best YT gun channels, MAC is also a great guy. He tries to avoid politics and just shoot guns, but in this video (and the comments) you can see him dropping subtle but strong RedPills: Indentity politics, Facebook censorship, media manipulation, etc. Maybe he has a secret T_D account.

Anyway, put down the tendies and KY for one fucking second, sign these petitions, and send some emails/letters to your reps (and the send some more tomorrow.)

After Sessions swears in... by JerryMahal in The_Donald

[–]DaSquariusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not entirely true, there are limits to Spousal Communication Privilege. Namely:

Two further scenarios apply to defeat the attachment of the spousal communications privilege: if the confidential communication was made in order to plan or commit crime or fraud, or if a defendant-spouse wishes, in a criminal trial, to testify in their own defense, about a confidential marital communication. In these five cases, a court will not allow either spouse to assert the privilege to block the testimony. 1

Rand Paul will be joining Tucker Carlson tonight to discuss the importance of auditing the Federal Reserve! Tune in for a dose of liberty. 9:35pm ET by Brioux in The_Donald

[–]DaSquariusGreen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, in the modern world some kind of central system, but that doesn't mean the Fed. We could have one that is:

  1. Publicly owned, not privately
  2. Government backed instead of debt backed
  3. Essential a legit government bank, not a separate one looking to profit off of the taxpayer for private benefit.

Migrant breaks girl's nose for refusing sex advances - then knocks out her rescuer by Pakek in The_Donald

[–]DaSquariusGreen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agressive Migrants + Low Energy β locals = Women are fucked (in more ways than one). Very sad, Europe was a beautiful place.

Liberal says he wants Milo on his campus and tells other liberals to learn to make actual arguments or leave by Conkam in The_Donald

[–]DaSquariusGreen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They because they are really Leftist and Regressive. This sub should really switch exclusively to those terms. It will spread. Calling them "liberals" smears the true meaning of the word. The Founding Fathers were all "Liberals", but they'd been much more aligned with the Republican party than anyone else (though some Libertarians).

Many kids labeled as "transgendered" might just have autism (more links inside). Naturally, this is sending activists berzerk. by mrr1 in The_Donald

[–]DaSquariusGreen 26 points27 points  (0 children)

"Gender Disphoria" has been in the DSM (main mental health diagnosis book) for years. It is a disorder - I have one my self. Pretending these kind of things are normal is sickening and does great harm to the patient ( I have experienced this too). Why do you think that suicide rates are so high among trans people - it's not because they are being "bullied to death". It's because living with an untreated disease sucks. Indulging transgenderism instead of treating it (and no, not with Bible verses) is damaging to the individuals and to society.

Leftists Meltdown, Blame “White Supremacy” For Patriots’ Super Bowl Win by thunderbert80 in The_Donald

[–]DaSquariusGreen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They talk so much about "not dividing" and "multiculturalism" - and then immediately proceed to label one team "whites" and one time "niggas" (this is not the only Tweet).

I'm pretty sure most Pat's fans just saw winners (also, both teams have a lot of white and black players).

Image that sums up why Trump won by PS2Errol in The_Donald

[–]DaSquariusGreen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Honestly, before the Leftists starting ruining the state at large (in fact for most of its history), the self-reliable, hard won, grit that people associate with the West applied to a lot of California. Just read some Steinbeck. Look into the Bear Flag revlot. This used to be America too, but the corruption of Hollywood spread far.

Get ready for "Patriots fans are racists" articles, and "Patriots least liked team in NFL" articles. by Remarkable_Nutsack in The_Donald

[–]DaSquariusGreen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When you actually put your mind to it, it's surprising how easy it is to beat them at their own game. They really aren't sending their best.

The power of memes and laughter to break the false narrative is astounding.

'If trade stops, war starts' Alibaba founder who visited Donald Trump warns by shanapetters in politics

[–]DaSquariusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently you haven't read a thing I have linked.

Yes, they have produced a number of WS-10s - and they are garbage. Unreliable, underpowered/under rated, and unsafe - in the Chinese own words. That is why they continue to use their old Russian Saturn engines, and are looking to buy new ones. And why Shenyang is having no export success. But go ahead; keeping linking the same Wikipedia article, posting numbers that you obviously don't understand the meaning of, and trying to make the facts conform to your narrative. This is getting silly. Have good night.

'If trade stops, war starts' Alibaba founder who visited Donald Trump warns by shanapetters in politics

[–]DaSquariusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except no, you didn't say that before.

I did, many times, but I guess not to you. I apologise, I have been very busy tonight, and I haven't really been keeping track of who I was responding too. See my thread with AnnArchist.

What you did say was, "the Chinese cant even produce their own jet engines yet". When I showed that you were factually wrong on that point, you kept adding qualifiers that I also showed were wrong.

Actually, you haven't, at all. The context we were speaking about was obvious: military strength and technology, and nation state level competition. You and I both know that. To interpret it otherwise would mean you are trying to violate the principle of charity, which would just be dishonest.

I have given ample evidence - which I doubt you actually read - (and there are mountains more of the same all over the web), that China cannot domestically mass produce, a reliable, modern, engine, for combat aircraft - which in the context of equipping a modern military is "being able to build a jet engine". Test, prototypes, trials, etc mean nothing - frontline fighters with reliable engines are the proof.

Now, you could twist my words around, or try and catch me in some petty semantic trap. If that make you feel better, or feel that you've "won". Good. I hope you sleep well. Personally, I don't see a point in continuing to play a childish game.