0(0%) Volume: 2,899,629 1:01AM EST| Market Cap | 119.77 B | P/E(ttm) | 30.38 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Value | 116.15 B | P/B | 19.30 |
NYSE:MA has been successfully added into Your Stock Email Alerts list.
You can manage your stock email alerts here.
NYSE:MA has been removed from your Stock Email Alerts list.
Please enter Portfolio Name for new portfolio.

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a companys financial situation is. It is based on these factors
1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.
A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash to Debt | 2.10 |
MA's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
60% of the 364 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 0.56 vs. MA: 2.10 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only. |
MA'
s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15 Med: 14.58 Max: No Debt Current: 2.1 |
| Equity to Asset | 0.36 |
MA's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
59% of the 349 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. MA: 0.36 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only. |
MA'
s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24 Med: 0.46 Max: 0.62 Current: 0.36 |
| Interest Coverage | 71.49 |
MA's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
60% of the 344 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 7.42 vs. MA: 71.49 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only. |
MA'
s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.75 Med: 83.25 Max: 321.64 Current: 71.49 |
| F-Score: 7 |
|
| Z-Score: 9.95 |
|
| M-Score: -2.51 |
|
| WACC vs ROIC |
1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin (%) | 52.24 |
MA's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
81% of the 366 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 19.21 vs. MA: 52.24 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only. |
MA'
s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.71 Med: 47 Max: 54.17 Current: 52.24 |
| Net-margin (%) | 38.11 |
MA's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
80% of the 366 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 13.17 vs. MA: 38.11 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only. |
MA'
s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.09 Med: 31.01 Max: 39.39 Current: 38.11 |
| ROE (%) | 67.31 |
MA's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
98% of the 369 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 6.65 vs. MA: 67.31 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only. |
MA'
s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.25 Med: 42.78 Max: 67.31 Current: 67.31 |
| ROA (%) | 24.97 |
MA's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
98% of the 380 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 2.33 vs. MA: 24.97 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only. |
MA'
s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.99 Med: 21.81 Max: 24.97 Current: 24.97 |
| ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) | 808.36 |
MA's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
95% of the 297 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 13.74 vs. MA: 808.36 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only. |
MA'
s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -93.67 Med: 634.74 Max: 904.61 Current: 808.36 |
| Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) | 13.10 |
MA's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 257 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. MA: 13.10 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only. |
MA'
s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.3 Med: 12.4 Max: 20.8 Current: 13.1 |
| EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) | 12.50 |
MA's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
60% of the 225 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 5.40 vs. MA: 12.50 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only. |
MA'
s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.8 Med: 20.35 Max: 126 Current: 12.5 |
| EPS Growth (3Y)(%) | 15.20 |
MA's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 225 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. MA: 15.20 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only. |
MA'
s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.3 Med: 23.65 Max: 211.3 Current: 15.2 |
| Steven Cohen 435,600 sh (New) Andreas Halvorsen 1,952,623 sh (+1103.36%) Lee Ainslie 5,590 sh (+109.36%) Wallace Weitz 667,634 sh (+68.65%) Jim Simons 3,497,900 sh (+15.77%) Pioneer Investments 3,471,032 sh (+15.60%) Robert Olstein 56,000 sh (+5.66%) Ken Fisher 250,623 sh (+1.67%) Tom Gayner 143,600 sh (+0.77%) Tom Russo 9,725,470 sh (+0.25%) Jeff Auxier 69,410 sh (+0.14%) Chuck Akre 4,713,511 sh (+0.10%) | PRIMECAP Management 606,300 sh (unchged) Westport Asset Management 307,500 sh (unchged) Julian Robertson 35,025 sh (unchged) Paul Tudor Jones 9,600 sh (unchged) Paul Tudor Jones 3,900 sh (unchged) | John Hussman Sold Out Chris Davis Sold Out Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out John Griffin 1,670,400 sh (-0.27%) Tweedy Browne 269,240 sh (-0.90%) Mario Gabelli 137,725 sh (-0.92%) Ruane Cunniff 5,182,954 sh (-2.56%) Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 4,693,423 sh (-2.81%) Bill Nygren 4,250,000 sh (-4.49%) Jeremy Grantham 539,949 sh (-4.99%) Warren Buffett 4,934,756 sh (-5.64%) Charles de Vaulx 1,199,779 sh (-6.60%) Murray Stahl 90,656 sh (-9.63%) First Eagle Investment 1,693,961 sh (-16.63%) Steve Mandel 5,076,587 sh (-17.46%) Chase Coleman 1,918,771 sh (-18.92%) Ron Baron 132,486 sh (-28.63%) RS Investment Management 3,231 sh (-45.51%) Paul Tudor Jones 13,777 sh (-61.21%) Spiros Segalas 8,759,490 sh (-7.60%) |
| Ray Dalio 5,500 sh (New) Joel Greenblatt 67,855 sh (New) Andreas Halvorsen 6,432,259 sh (+229.42%) Steven Cohen 685,800 sh (+57.44%) Jim Simons 5,384,700 sh (+53.94%) RS Investment Management 4,540 sh (+40.51%) Jeremy Grantham 658,098 sh (+21.88%) Lee Ainslie 6,390 sh (+14.31%) Wallace Weitz 728,064 sh (+9.05%) Pioneer Investments 3,747,725 sh (+7.97%) Tom Gayner 150,600 sh (+4.87%) Ron Baron 134,975 sh (+1.88%) John Griffin 1,677,600 sh (+0.43%) First Eagle Investment 1,697,709 sh (+0.22%) Tom Russo 9,739,551 sh (+0.14%) | Robert Olstein 56,000 sh (unchged) Jeff Auxier 69,410 sh (unchged) PRIMECAP Management 606,300 sh (unchged) Warren Buffett 4,934,756 sh (unchged) Spiros Segalas 8,759,490 sh (unchged) | Julian Robertson Sold Out Chuck Akre 4,708,638 sh (-0.10%) Tweedy Browne 268,770 sh (-0.17%) Mario Gabelli 136,877 sh (-0.62%) Steve Mandel 4,968,587 sh (-2.13%) Chase Coleman 1,874,271 sh (-2.32%) Charles de Vaulx 1,153,438 sh (-3.86%) Ruane Cunniff 4,979,934 sh (-3.92%) Ken Fisher 240,434 sh (-4.07%) Bill Nygren 4,070,000 sh (-4.24%) Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 4,483,949 sh (-4.46%) Murray Stahl 85,733 sh (-5.43%) Westport Asset Management 257,500 sh (-16.26%) Paul Tudor Jones 6,636 sh (-51.83%) |
| Louis Moore Bacon 245,184 sh (New) Paul Tudor Jones 279,600 sh (+4113.38%) Ray Dalio 11,109 sh (+101.98%) Jeremy Grantham 1,102,484 sh (+67.53%) Joel Greenblatt 109,499 sh (+61.37%) Ken Fisher 295,924 sh (+23.08%) Andreas Halvorsen 7,684,256 sh (+19.46%) Wallace Weitz 797,039 sh (+9.47%) Pioneer Investments 4,020,543 sh (+7.28%) Ruane Cunniff 5,233,499 sh (+5.09%) Jim Simons 5,644,100 sh (+4.82%) Chase Coleman 1,904,444 sh (+1.61%) Tom Russo 9,775,132 sh (+0.37%) John Griffin 1,679,100 sh (+0.09%) | Tom Gayner 150,600 sh (unchged) Warren Buffett 4,934,756 sh (unchged) Lee Ainslie 6,390 sh (unchged) | Steve Mandel Sold Out Chuck Akre 4,707,088 sh (-0.03%) First Eagle Investment 1,690,995 sh (-0.40%) Tweedy Browne 267,170 sh (-0.60%) Murray Stahl 84,513 sh (-1.42%) Jeff Auxier 68,360 sh (-1.51%) Ron Baron 132,652 sh (-1.72%) Robert Olstein 54,000 sh (-3.57%) Bill Nygren 3,870,000 sh (-4.91%) Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 4,197,937 sh (-6.38%) Charles de Vaulx 1,075,065 sh (-6.79%) Mario Gabelli 106,877 sh (-21.92%) Steven Cohen 476,600 sh (-30.50%) PRIMECAP Management 54,100 sh (-91.08%) Spiros Segalas 6,841,357 sh (-21.90%) |
| Ken Fisher 305,894 sh (+3.37%) | Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 3,928,450 sh (-6.42%) Spiros Segalas 6,509,610 sh (-4.85%) |
(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)
above to check out all the Gurus, or
above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
What is Peter Lynch Charts )| Industry: | Credit Services » Credit Services NAICS: 522320 SIC: 7389 | |
|---|---|---|
| Compare: | NYSE:AXP, NYSE:V, NAS:PYPL, NYSE:COF, NYSE:SYF, NYSE:DFS, OTCPK:ORXCF, NYSE:ADS, NYSE:WU, NYSE:TSS, OTCPK:ACMUY, OTCPK:FPLPY, NAS:SLM, OTCPK:EDNMY, NAS:NAVI, NAS:CACC, OTCPK:ELEEF, NYSE:OMF, NYSE:LC, NYSE:FCFS » details | |
| Traded in other countries: | MSCD34.Brazil, M4I.Germany, MA.Mexico, MA.Switzerland, 0R2Z.UK, |

Mastercard (NYSE:MA) operates the world’s second-largest payment network and one of the best known global brands. During the quarter, shares rose as investors applauded continued payment volume growth and a slightly improved economic global outlook. Mastercard is among the most attractive businesses we own. Its network is well entrenched within the plumbing of payment systems across the globe. The transition from cash to digital forms of payment provide growth opportunities, while the core business produces healthy doses of excess cash flow with modest reinvestment requirements.

MasterCard (NYSE:MA) shares have suffered during the first half of 2016 in part as a reaction against all the global disruption ongoing in financial markets and global political corridors. Terrorist bombings throughout Europe slow travel and slow cross-border transactions, the growth of which had over the past decades fueled growth in interconnect revenues. Decline in consumer confidence also pressures revenues and growth in gross dollar volumes billed.
Finally, MasterCard and other domestic payment networks suffer from concern over the overturning of an agreed settlement with retailers over alleged anticompetitive pricing activities. The repeal of the settlement in the United States coupled with a judicial loss in the United Kingdom in a law suit alleging anticompetitive pricing has triggered concerns over regulatory and legal environment, now weighing on MasterCard’s share price.
I believe that current turbulence impacting MasterCard’s share price will abate as travel patterns return, consumer confidence restores, and payment networks reach reasonable ways in which to be paid for the benefits that payment systems offer merchants. The growth of mobile platforms will only further drive the migration globally from cash payment (cash payments represent currently over 80 percent of commerce throughout the world beyond the United States) to digital payment. MasterCard has massive capacity to reinvest mature industry cash flows to exploit new marketing opportunities for using credit, for increased consumer spending, for assisting government distribution of social benefits in secure manner, etc.
From Tom Russo (Trades, Portfolio)'s Semper Vic Partners second quarter 2016 shareholder letter.



MasterCard Inc. (NYSE:MA) (1.9%) (MA – $97.36 – NYSE) is a technology company in the global payments industry that operates the world’s fastest payments processing network, connecting consumers, financial institutions, merchants, governments and businesses in more than 210 countries and territories. MasterCard’s products and solutions make everyday commerce activities – such as shopping, traveling, running a business and managing finances – easier, more secure and more efficient for everyone.
From the GAMCO Global Growth Fund fourth quarter 2015 commentary.

MasterCard (NYSE:MA) is the world’s second largest payment network and one of the best known global brands, needing little introduction. The Fund began building a position below $85 during the broader market swoon in August at a nice discount to our base case estimate of intrinsic value. MasterCard is among the most attractive businesses we own. Its network is well entrenched within the plumbing of payment systems across the globe, the transition from cash to digital forms of payment provides growth opportunities over and above underlying economic expansion, and its core business produces healthy doses of excess cash flow with modest reinvestment requirements. We would welcome additional opportunities to add to the Fund’s position.
From Weitz Funds' Balanced Fund third quarter 2015 commentary.

MasterCard, Inc. (NYSE:MA) is the world’s second-largest payments technology company that connects consumers, businesses, banks and governments, enabling them to use electronic forms of payment instead of cash and checks. There are over two billion MasterCard- and Maestro-branded cards outstanding with acceptance at 36 million locations in more than 210 countries and territories. Broad merchant acceptance and consumer adoption of MasterCard-branded cards create strong network effects. 85% of all payment transactions are made with cash or checks today, while only 15% are made with electronic forms of payment, providing substantial room for further growth. We added to our position in MasterCard in the quarter.
From Baron Opportunity Fund's third quarter 2015 letter.

Mastercard Inc. (NYSE:MA)(3.2%) (MA – $90.12 – NYSE) is a technology company in the global payments industry that operates the world’s fastest payments processing network, connecting consumers, financial institutions, merchants, governments and businesses in more than 210 countries and territories. MasterCard’s products and solutions make everyday commerce activities – such as shopping, traveling, running a business and managing finances – easier, more secure and more efficient for everyone.
From GAMCO's Growth Fund third quarter 2015 commentary.

Question:
A couple of questions on MasterCard (NYSE:MA). Visa (NYSE:V) benefits from a lot of the same secular trends that MasterCard does; so I am curious why you guys own MasterCard and not Visa. Secondly, if you could comment on some of the recent acquisitions that MasterCard has made, and the strategic and financial rationale, if you agree with those.
John Harris:
Let’s see, why do we own MasterCard instead of Visa? There is not really a good answer. We should have owned both. We should have owned more of both. We should have owned a lot more of both. It is a tremendous mistake for which I bear significant responsibility. So that is the answer to that.
The acquisitions — I have to be honest with you, and this is self-deprecating and not intentionally so — I have had a tough time understanding many of the acquisitions that these two companies have done over the years. Not just MasterCard, Visa also. Visa plunked down a sizeable amount of money to buy a business called CyberSource, which worked for a couple years and now is not working so well. There is an understanding at the card networks that things will eventually change. It has been remarkable and surprising to me how slow the pace of change has actually been and how as threats have emerged, they have quickly gone by the wayside. It just turns out that the network business model is incredibly resilient. But there is some concern — subconscious, whatever you want to call it — that eventually things may change and that the change is going to be driven by technology. So there is a desire on both of their parts, especially when new CEOs took over at both companies I noticed a marked increase in this desire, to try to ramp up the pace of innovation hopefully to head off some of the technological threats that they see on the horizon. The fact of the matter is that Visa and MasterCard have not traditionally been terribly innovative organizations. They were cooperatives for most of their lives and overseen by bankers. That is all you need to know on that subject.
They are doing their best. To be totally honest, they feel like part of being innovative and doing a good job is buying small innovative businesses. Whether any of them have really added anything, there certainly is no perceptible evidence. It is possible that at some point in the future we will find out that MasterCard is able to adapt to technological change because of some small acquisition it did in the past — it is entirely possible, but I do not see any evidence of it. In the past, for the most part the deals the company has done have been so small that they have had a nonmaterial impact on the financial progress of the business. This year that has changed a little bit. MasterCard did a couple of deals that were pretty meaningfully dilutive to its earnings so that the company is going to have the slowest rate of earnings growth it has had this year since we have owned the stock and since it has been a public company — we have owned it for its entire life as a public company. A lot of that is foreign exchange, which is a real headwind this year. Part of it is those acquisitions, which are detracting in a meaningful way from the earnings.
Bob Goldfarb:
As to why we bought MasterCard rather than Visa, we bought MasterCard in the first few days that it went public. We should have kept going, as John said. Visa went public later and it was priced off MasterCard, which was selling at a significantly higher price at that time than when it went public.
From Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Investor Day 2015 Transcript Part I.
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E(ttm) | 30.38 |
MA's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
73% of the 281 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 14.99 vs. MA: 30.38 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only. |
MA'
s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.09 Med: 26.68 Max: 308.33 Current: 30.38 |
| Forward P/E | 25.25 |
MA's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
93% of the 44 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 11.85 vs. MA: 25.25 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only. |
N/A |
| PE(NRI) | 30.38 |
MA's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
71% of the 286 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. MA: 30.38 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only. |
MA'
s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.12 Med: 26.64 Max: 370 Current: 30.38 |
| Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) | 34.37 |
MA's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked lower than
83% of the 86 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 12.59 vs. MA: 34.37 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only. |
MA'
s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.69 Med: 29.65 Max: 135.05 Current: 34.37 |
| P/B | 19.30 |
MA's P/B is ranked lower than
97% of the 356 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. MA: 19.30 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only. |
MA'
s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.81 Med: 8.48 Max: 19.6 Current: 19.3 |
| P/S | 11.58 |
MA's P/S is ranked lower than
80% of the 341 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 3.73 vs. MA: 11.58 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only. |
MA'
s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.8 Med: 7.24 Max: 12.22 Current: 11.58 |
| PFCF | 29.39 |
MA's PFCF is ranked lower than
88% of the 84 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 7.80 vs. MA: 29.39 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only. |
MA'
s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.66 Med: 26.61 Max: 87.37 Current: 29.39 |
| POCF | 26.95 |
MA's POCF is ranked lower than
83% of the 107 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 8.93 vs. MA: 26.95 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only. |
MA'
s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.61 Med: 24.12 Max: 53.48 Current: 26.95 |
| EV-to-EBIT | 21.36 |
MA's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
58% of the 283 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 17.65 vs. MA: 21.36 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only. |
MA'
s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -136.5 Med: 16.2 Max: 75.7 Current: 21.36 |
| EV-to-EBITDA | 20.00 |
MA's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
58% of the 286 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 15.33 vs. MA: 20.00 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only. |
MA'
s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -154.9 Med: 15.4 Max: 625.1 Current: 20 |
| PEG | 1.63 |
MA's PEG is ranked lower than
71% of the 99 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 0.74 vs. MA: 1.63 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only. |
MA'
s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.62 Med: 1.43 Max: 1.77 Current: 1.63 |
| Shiller P/E | 56.43 |
MA's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
90% of the 42 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 15.60 vs. MA: 56.43 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only. |
MA'
s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.61 Med: 65.07 Max: 81.71 Current: 56.43 |
| Current Ratio | 1.65 |
MA's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
65% of the 279 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 2.91 vs. MA: 1.65 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only. |
MA'
s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.33 Med: 1.81 Max: 2.24 Current: 1.65 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.65 |
MA's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 278 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 2.67 vs. MA: 1.65 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only. |
MA'
s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.33 Med: 1.81 Max: 2.24 Current: 1.65 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 44.96 |
MA's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
64% of the 180 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 15.92 vs. MA: 44.96 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only. |
MA'
s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 40.74 Med: 46.74 Max: 84.29 Current: 44.96 |
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.72 |
MA's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
83% of the 259 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 2.49 vs. MA: 0.72 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only. |
MA'
s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09 Med: 0.3 Max: 0.82 Current: 0.72 |
| Dividend Payout | 0.21 |
MA's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
86% of the 154 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 0.30 vs. MA: 0.21 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only. |
MA'
s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04 Med: 0.07 Max: 0.24 Current: 0.21 |
| Dividend Growth (3y) | 77.40 |
MA's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
98% of the 89 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 6.80 vs. MA: 77.40 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only. |
MA'
s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0 Med: -3.6 Max: 101.4 Current: 77.4 |
| Forward Dividend Yield | 0.80 |
MA's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
83% of the 253 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 2.76 vs. MA: 0.80 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only. |
N/A |
| Yield on cost (5-Year) | 11.25 |
MA's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
88% of the 321 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 3.29 vs. MA: 11.25 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only. |
MA'
s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41 Med: 4.69 Max: 12.82 Current: 11.25 |
| 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio | 2.10 |
MA's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
85% of the 131 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: -3.50 vs. MA: 2.10 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only. |
MA'
s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.1 Med: -4.25 Max: 9.1 Current: 2.1 |
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price/Net Current Asset Value | 177.29 |
MA's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
98% of the 171 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 2.08 vs. MA: 177.29 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only. |
MA'
s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.83 Med: 17.43 Max: 590.63 Current: 177.29 |
| Price/Tangible Book | 32.81 |
MA's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
99% of the 346 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. MA: 32.81 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only. |
MA'
s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.96 Med: 11.37 Max: 37.13 Current: 32.81 |
| Price/Projected FCF | 2.25 | ||
| Price/Median PS Value | 1.60 |
MA's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
82% of the 308 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 0.98 vs. MA: 1.60 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only. |
MA'
s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27 Med: 1 Max: 1.69 Current: 1.6 |
| Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value | 1.77 |
MA's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
89% of the 46 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. MA: 1.77 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only. |
MA'
s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1 Med: 0.2 Max: 1.77 Current: 1.77 |
| Price/Graham Number | 6.65 |
MA's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
93% of the 247 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 0.98 vs. MA: 6.65 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only. |
MA'
s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2 Med: 3.68 Max: 11.16 Current: 6.65 |
| Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) | 4.69 |
MA's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 358 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. MA: 4.69 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only. |
MA'
s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.3 Med: 6 Max: 11.7 Current: 4.69 |
| Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) | 19.84 |
MA's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 101 Companies in the Global Credit Services industry. ( Industry Median: 6.83 vs. MA: 19.84 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only. |
MA'
s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1 Med: 2.5 Max: 76.8 Current: 19.84 |
| Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $ | 10,537 |
|---|---|
| EPS (TTM) $ | 3.62 |
| Beta | 1.18 |
| Short Percentage of Float | 0.67% |
| 52-Week Range $ | 78.52 - 110.13 |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 1,089.61 |
| Dec16 | Dec17 | Dec18 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (Mil $) | 10,721 | 11,871 | 13,510 |
| EPS ($) | 3.64 | 4.28 | 5.06 |
| EPS w/o NRI ($) | 3.64 | 4.28 | 5.06 |
| EPS Growth Rate (3Y to 5Y Estimate) | 13.19% | ||
| Dividends Per Share ($) | 0.76 | 0.99 | |
| PayPal Aiming to Dominate Global Payments Jan 21 2017 |
| Insiders Roundup: Mastercard, Facebook, JPMorgan Jan 20 2017 |
| Risks Associated With MasterCard Jan 18 2017 |
| 5 Companies Reach Yearly Highs Jan 17 2017 |
| 6 Profitable Companies With Strong Yield Jan 04 2017 |
| 24 Questions With Gary Denson Dec 23 2016 |
| How to Research an Industry Dec 11 2016 |
| Insiders Sell Mastercard, Facebook Nov 18 2016 |
| Louis Moore Bacon Goes 3 for 3 in 3rd Quarter Nov 18 2016 |
| Growth Drivers Could Help PayPal Challenge Visa Nov 16 2016 |