Twitter | Cerca | |
Ankit Panda
Senior Editor & Adjunct Senior Fellow in NYC. Working on security, geopolitics, & economics in Asia. Via . RT≠❤️=⭐.
80.036
Tweet
1.039
Following
38.907
Follower
Tweet
Ankit Panda ha ritwittato
Kingston Reif 18 min
I have a question. Actually two. Do we need to build up our missile defenses against a country that no longer poses a nuclear threat? Will the forthcoming DoD Missile Defense Review note that North Korea is no longer a nuclear threat?
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 17 min
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 21 min
. beat me to writing this and did it way better than I could have: It Takes a Village to Raze a Test Stand
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda ha ritwittato
Stephen Schwartz 2 h
So you'll cancel the Missile Defense Agency's plans to build a very expensive third site for our unreliable Ground-Based Missile Defense system, and direct Congress to delete the $3.6 billion it recently added to MDA's budget specifically in response to the North Korean threat?
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 40 min
President Trump has ordered the Pentagon to cancel military exercises with South Korea — what happens next?
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 1 h
US to boost nuke sniffing with modified C-130s
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 1 h
With Misleading Claims, Trump Dismisses 1994 North Korea Nuclear Deal
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 1 h
This is frankly amazing: Trump says North Korea ‘no longer’ a nuclear threat as he returns to Washington
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda ha ritwittato
M. Taylor Fravel 19 h
North Korea Is a Nuclear Power. Get Used to It. by and 's
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda ha ritwittato
Mira Rapp-Hooper 19 h
This 💯.The proper comparison is not nuclear war, but what a real pressure campaign and diplomatic process could have produced.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda ha ritwittato
Shashank Joshi 2 h
Most important thing in Maas' speech wasn't the dig at Trump, but the steadily escalating language that Germany is using about China: "We need a common strategy for dealing with China's power political ambitions, including for resisting targeted attempts at dividing us".
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 2 h
Andrei Lankov: Was that it? The remarkably nebulous Singapore agreement
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 2 h
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda ha ritwittato
Omar S. Bashir 3 h
Deterrence through being in denial
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 2 h
I think that depends on if he'll feel like he's being stonewalled by US demands—and thinks getting Trump back in the room with him will be the way to get what he wants. (Likely.)
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 2 h
It is! But POTUS moving on to other natsec agenda items and leaving the NK portfolio to his lieutenants is what I meant, not abandonment—allow Sung Kim/State to start sweating the details and moving past the Singapore declaration.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 2 h
In risposta a @nktpnd
Point isn't that USG writ large should close book on DPRK; rather that it could be a good thing if Trump steps back and lets his lieutenants pick up the process from here. Will keep US-DPRK engagement going without the chaos/uncertainty that comes from POTUS taking an interest.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 2 h
In risposta a @nktpnd
Moon's peace process has 1) come early in his term (unlike Roh Moo-hyun's 2007 attempt), 2) has broad public support, and 3) can see consolidation with broad legislative support too. Obstacles on the multilateral sanctions front not insignificant though.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 2 h
Keep an eye on ROK domestic politics; conservatives are in trouble: “The ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) swept the local elections as well as by-elections for 12 empty National Assembly seats”
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Ankit Panda 3 h
This is fascinating. He wants to close the book on the DPRK issue. Might not be so bad,actually.
Reply Retweet Mi piace