Start a hangout
EverythingPeople and pagesCollectionsCommunitiesGoogle+ postsPhotos
More
Stream
#scotus
Best of
Miranda Bell
Shared publicly -Miranda C. Bell – @truthsearch1957. COSA/COA #WILLING TO #HUMILIATE #EMBARRASS #DISGRACE & #RUIN THEIR OWN #REPUTATION COVERING UP DYCK & PSKLLC $CRIMES https://plus.google.com/102847795492866796753/posts/LqeK4hupqQp … Embedded image. 7:39 PM - 5 Jan ...
6
lucky sanity
+
1
2
1
2
1
I love ur speeches over the government and legal power, I wish to meet you here online, so that I will learn ur ethics and policies of life, thanks in anticipation.
Add a comment...
Angie Staft
Shared publicly -What is your opinion on this? Do you agree with the #SCOTUS decision, or do you believe that there should be limits on #FreedomOfSpeech and specifically internet speech? After the #ACLU brought motions for Elonis's case to be heard, his conviction was overturned based on his lack of intent, without the debate for freedom of speech having to be brought to the SCOTUS on his behalf. It should be noted also that our Constitution protects the people from state statutes that violate any of the amendments, including freedom of speech. However, this is then contradicted by federal laws limiting speech- rather confusing- so interested in your input.
Other cases involving freedom of speech at the Supreme Court Level note key words are the requirement of both (1) & (2)- "AND IS LIKELY TO INCITE OR PRODUCE SUCH ACTION" #SCOTUS cases: Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), Hess v. Indiana (1973).
"Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action."- Definition of 'Imminent Lawless Action" derived from a person's speech: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action
http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-elonis-v-us
Other cases involving freedom of speech at the Supreme Court Level note key words are the requirement of both (1) & (2)- "AND IS LIKELY TO INCITE OR PRODUCE SUCH ACTION" #SCOTUS cases: Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), Hess v. Indiana (1973).
"Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action."- Definition of 'Imminent Lawless Action" derived from a person's speech: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action
http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-elonis-v-us
1
Add a comment...
Adelson, Testan, Brundo, Novell & Jimenez
Shared publicly -(Reuters) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday let stand a lower court's decision that an online advertising site accused by three young women of facilitating child sex trafficking was protected by a federal law that has shielded website operators from liability for content posted by others.
1
Add a comment...
The Alderman Law Office
Shared publicly -The Supreme Court let stand a lower court's decision that an advertising site accused of facilitating child sex trafficking was protected by a federal law.
1
Add a comment...
Justin's Political Corner
Shared publicly -My latest on Daily Kos: #SCOTUS grants cert to critical transgender rights case G.G. (Gavin Grimm) v. Gloucester. Hopefully Gavin Grimm wins his case whenever the ruling comes handed down by SCOTUS (most likely sometime in late June of 2017). #GGvGloucester #GavinGrimm #LGBTQ #Transgender #StandWithGavin http://justinspoliticalcorner.tumblr.com/post/152435487777/scotus-grants-cert-to-critical-transgender-rights
This afternoon, the Supreme Court has granted cert to G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board, a case on transgender rights pertaining to Gavin Grimm being prohibited from using restrooms or locker room that matches the gender he identifies as in his...
1
1
Add a comment...
Women For Justice - Our Revolution
Shared publicly -Public_Citizen: RT DemAwakening: Retweet if you agree: Congress should join #WeThePeople in opposing the #SCOTUS a… Embedded image. 3:49 AM - 22 Aug 2016. 1 Retweet1 Like. Reply to @PascoRevolution · Home · Sign up · Log in · Search · About. More like this; Less like this
17
8
Add a comment...
Justin Gibson
Shared publicly -North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr got in trouble for making a gun-related joke about Hillary Clinton on Monday, and he later apologized for it. But that ...
1
1
Add a comment...
Susan Stone
Shared publicly -11




6 comments
SteveV
+
5
6
5
6
5
The self-proclaimed constitutionalist want to end democracy by killing one of the branches of government designed to maintain checks and balances. Wow, I can't fathom the logic for that one!
Add a comment...
Anne-Marie Clark
Shared publicly -SCOTUS 2017
Out/In
Out/In
@SCOTUSPlaces Tax on color: RT @Khanoisseur: Let this sink in: Tax dodging Trump thinks SCOTUS tax (cont) http://tl.gd/nnacdh · Optimist long memory · 21h21 hours ago. Optimist long memory @Rockmedia. @SCOTUSPlaces Dear @JusticeWillett Am guessing only 49000 people sent you the above, ...
2
Add a comment...
The Alderman Law Office
Shared publicly -#SCOTUS lets stand DC Cir. ban on flight-sharing #app, as common carrier. #tech http://ow.ly/KuNO307SiUh
1
Add a comment...
The Alderman Law Office
Shared publicly -Can you trademark an offensive name or not? Justices to decide.
1
Add a comment...
Guns & Gadgets
Discussion -Obama Petitions SCOTUS To Enforce Gun Control
youtu.be/sWOG2ByP2Cc #obama #guncontrol #scotus #2ndamendment #2a #nra #guns #trump 🔫
youtu.be/sWOG2ByP2Cc #obama #guncontrol #scotus #2ndamendment #2a #nra #guns #trump 🔫
5
2
Add a comment...
PoliticusUSA
Shared publicly -John McCain’s Vow To Block Any Clinton SCOTUS Nominee Shows Republicans Have Learned Nothing
Republicans are in the midst of an election where they could lose the White House by a landslide, control of the Senate, and see their House majority significantly reduced, but John McCain's promise to block any Clinton Supreme Court nominee shows that Republicans have learned nothing.
#SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #Senate #obstructionism
Republicans are in the midst of an election where they could lose the White House by a landslide, control of the Senate, and see their House majority significantly reduced, but John McCain's promise to block any Clinton Supreme Court nominee shows that Republicans have learned nothing.
#SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #Senate #obstructionism
12
3




6 comments
harry hayes
+
1
2
1
2
1
Fuck the republicans.
Add a comment...
Douglas Pierre
Shared publicly -Texas Will Seek #SCOTUS Review of 5th Circuit Voter ID Ruling: Is It Planning on Challenging Rules This Election?
1
Add a comment...
George Station
Shared publicly -Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) made admissions that could be awkward for his Republican Senate colleagues trying to block President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court.
In an interview published Monday, Flake conceded that nobody in the Republican Party "really believes" that late Justice Antonin Scalia's Supreme Court seat should be left for the next president to fill.
As proof, he flipped the scenario around and envisioned...
2
Add a comment...
Democracy Now!
Shared publicly -We go to Wisconsin to get reaction from The Nation’s John Nichols to a new report on possible illegal fundraising by the state’s Republican governor, Scott Walker, for the third-party group Wisconsin Club for Growth. The report is based on leaked documents from an investigation the state’s highest court halted in 2015. "Governor Walker has survived revelations of this sort before," Nichols says, but adds that he could face a challenge if the U.S...
15
1


3 comments
You first lovey! :-D
Add a comment...
















