Uniquely Qualified Neutrals
The experienced neutrals of the JAMS Financial Markets Group are uniquely qualified to resolve complex securities and financial markets disputes. The panel includes some of our most prominent Resolution Experts from across the United States, including retired federal, state trial and appellate judges and former litigators. They have years of dispute resolution experience and relevant industry expertise and receive ongoing training in financial markets litigation and ADR. JAMS neutrals are particularly skilled at evaluating litigation risk and facilitating resolution at a time when the actions of financial institutions are the subject of unprecedented public and regulatory scrutiny.
These distinguished mediators and arbitrators have handled thousands of high profile matters involving the world’s largest investment banks, securities firms, commercial banks, institutional investors, hedge funds and private equity firms. They frequently resolve disputes involving financial fraud, market manipulation, collateralized debt obligations, investor class actions, breaches of contract and fiduciary duties as well as securities, bankruptcy and antitrust litigation.
Cost-Effective Resolution
The world’s largest private ADR provider, JAMS has delivered cost-effective dispute resolution services to a broad range of clients for more than 30 years. We offer mediation, arbitration, e-discovery special masters and other custom ADR processes tailored to resolve credit crisis and financial matters. JAMS neutrals are chosen for their proven ability to resolve difficult disputes quickly, providing significant savings of time and expense for all parties.
Our efficient case management system and network of local JAMS Resolution Centers in major cities throughout the United States and the European Union make us well-equipped to handle the logistics related to resolving both individual and large, multi-party class disputes.
Sample Cases
|
|
P.312-655-0555
F.312-655-0644
|
||
|
|
P.214-744-5267
F.214-720-6010
|
||
|
|
P.415-982-5267
F.415-982-5287
|
||
|
|
P.404-588-0900
F.404-588-0905
|
||
|
|
P.415-982-5267
F.415-982-5287
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.312-655-0555
F.312-655-0644
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.408-288-2240
F.408-295-5267
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.305-371-5267
F.305-371-5288
|
||
|
|
P.415-982-5267
F.415-982-5287
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.415-982-5267
F.415-982-5287
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.415-982-5267
F.415-982-5287
|
||
|
|
P.214-744-5267
F.214-720-6010
|
||
|
|
P.415-982-5267
F.415-982-5287
|
||
|
|
P.714-939-1300
F.714-939-8710
|
||
|
|
P.305-371-5267
F.305-371-5288
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.408-288-2240
F.408-295-5267
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
||
|
|
P.415-982-5267
F.415-982-5287
|
||
|
|
P.714-939-1300
F.714-939-8710
|
||
|
|
P.213-620-1133
F.213-620-0100
|
||
|
|
P.404-588-0900
F.404-588-0905
|
||
|
|
P.202-942-9180
F.202-942-9186
|
||
|
|
P.415-982-5267
F.415-982-5287
|
||
|
|
P.215-246-9494
F.215-246-0949
|
||
|
|
P.415-982-5267
F.415-982-5287
|
||
|
|
P.212-751-2700
F.212-751-4099
|
|
April 22, 2013
|
|
March 27, 2013
|
|
November 1, 2012
|
|
March 11, 2016
Daily Journal
|
|
March 31, 2014
Law.com
|
|
August 2012
Contra Costa Lawyer
|
|
January 18, 2012
Bloomberg Law Reports
|
|
June 2011
Bloomberg Law Reports
|
|
March 16, 2011
The Recorder
|