|
Why JAMS? JAMS mediators and arbitrators successfully resolve cases ranging in size, industry and complexity, typically achieving results more efficiently and cost effectively than through litigation. JAMS neutrals are skilled in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes including mediation, arbitration, special master, discovery referee, project neutral, and dispute review board work. |
Arbitration Rules, Clauses, and Procedures
At JAMS, We Take Arbitration as Seriously as You Do
We understand that there is a lot on the line in arbitration. We know attorneys count on JAMS to provide highly skilled arbitrators who use JAMS Managed Arbitration Process to save time and money. JAMS offers efficiency, speed, and results. If another arbitration provider was written into your contract, call an experienced JAMS Case Manager to discuss having your case administered by JAMS.
JAMS Optional Expedited Arbitration Procedures
JAMS has taken an industry-leading role to ensure arbitration remains an attractive alternative to litigation. In order to save clients time and money, JAMS has instituted procedural options that allow the crafting of a process that is commensurate with the dispute. With JAMS Optional Expedited Arbitration Procedures, parties can choose a process that limits depositions, document requests and e-discovery. When parties utilizing JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules elect to use these procedures, they agree to the voluntary and informal exchange of all non-privileged documents and other information relevant to the dispute. These rules are an innovative step taken by JAMS to guarantee that its clients can have an efficient process if they choose.
View JAMS Optional Expedited Arbitration Procedures
JAMS Arbitration Advantages
The Best Arbitrators
JAMS arbitrators are among the best and most experienced. With nearly 300 full-time neutrals, JAMS offers highly respected and experienced arbitrators, including retired state and federal court judges and attorneys. JAMS neutrals have experience as arbitrators under the rules of all major arbitral institutions. For an extensive list of JAMS arbitrators, please click here.
JAMS Managed Arbitration
JAMS arbitrators utilize a "Managed Arbitration Process" consisting of checklists and procedures to keep the arbitration on time and within budget, providing attorneys with peace of mind that their arbitration will be fair, professional, and timely with a reliable outcome. Our neutrals are available full-time, so arbitration hearings are scheduled promptly and most matters are resolved within six months of the appointment of the arbitrator. The JAMS Recommended Arbitration Discovery Protocols provide JAMS arbitrators with an effective tool that will help them exercise their sound judgment in furtherance of achieving an efficient, cost-effective process which affords the parties a fair opportunity to be heard.
View JAMS Recommended Arbitration Discovery Protocols
Custom Arbitration Rules and Optional Appeal Procedure
JAMS offers domestic and international arbitration rules tailored to help attorneys streamline the arbitration process for a timely and efficient resolution and ensure fairness to all parties. The unique JAMS Optional Appeal Procedure provides parties a method for meaningful review.
View JAMS Optional Arbitration Appeal Procedure
National Arbitration Committee
The JAMS National Arbitration Committee, a body independent of the arbitrator, decides issues of controversy that may arise when the arbitrator is unavailable, has not yet been appointed, or the issue involves the arbitrator, such as claims of conflict. The National Arbitration Committee acts as a safeguard to the fairness of the arbitration process.
Superior Case Management
JAMS employs case managers who have long track records of arbitration experience. Many have strong legal backgrounds and all receive ongoing training. Our case managers consistently receive high ratings from attorneys for their efficient, responsive, and friendly service.
Convenient Resolution Centers
With more than 20 locations in major cities throughout the United States, JAMS' signature Resolution Centers provide a neutral, professional, and comfortable environment to resolve the most challenging and complex individual and class disputes. Our Resolution Centers are in the heart of business districts nationwide.
View list of JAMS Resolution Centers
|
November 2, 2016
|
|
June 2, 2016
|
|
April 7, 2016
|
|
July 9, 2014
|
|
June 4, 2014
|
|
May 12, 2014
|
|
November 12, 2013
|
|
July 25, 2013
|
|
June 10, 2013
|
|
June 6, 2013
|
|
March 27, 2013
|
|
March 14, 2013
|
|
September 23, 2016
Daily Journal
|
|
September 1, 2016
The American Lawyer
|
|
September 1, 2016
Daily Report Online
|
|
Spring 2016
Feature Articles: Employee versus Independent Contractor: The Latest; ADR Options in Employment Trade Secret Matters; Classification of Laborers in the Sharing Economy; Sandquist: Who Decides?
|
|
June 1, 2016
California Lawyer
|
|
May 13, 2016
Daily Journal
|
|
Spring 2016
Feature Articles: "Spearin Lite? The Limited Implied Warranty in a Construction Management at Risk Project;" "Arbitrators Confronting Corruption;" "Effective Arbitration Management: Addressing Damages Early"
Download Spring 2016 Newsletter in PDF |
|
March 3, 2016
Law.com
|
|
February 19, 2016
InsideCounsel.com
|
|
February 5, 2016
Law.com
|
|
January 19, 2016
Law.com
|
|
October 23, 2015
Law.com
|
|
October 7, 2015
Law.com
|
|
September 7, 2015
The Recorder
|
|
Summer 2015
ABTL Report of the Association of Business Trial Lawyers, Northern California Chapter
|
|
June 24, 2015
Law.com
|
|
June 8, 2015
LAW360
|
|
May 25, 2015
Texas Lawyer
|
|
May 16, 2015
Daily Business Journal
|
|
March 4, 2015
Law.com
|
|
January 28, 2015
Law360
|
|
January 14, 2015
Law.com
|
|
December 15, 2014
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
|
|
October 22, 2014
Law.com
|
|
October 3, 2014
Law.com
|
|
September 30, 2014
Law.com
|
|
September 19, 2014
Daily Journal
|
|
September 12, 2014
Daily Journal
|
|
September 2014
Advocate
|
|
August 15, 2014
Daily Journal
|
|
Summer, 2014
ABTL Report
|
|
July 14, 2014
Law.com
|
|
June 30, 2014
Law.com
|
|
June 19, 2014
Law.com
|
|
May 20, 2014
Law.com
|
|
May 8, 2014
CDR
|
|
April 9, 2014
Law.com
|
|
Winter 2014
JAMS Washington State Newsletter
|
|
March 17, 2014
Law.com
|
|
March 4, 2014
Law.com
|
|
July 26, 2013
Los Angeles Daily Journal
|
|
March 2013
California Labor & Employment Law Review
|
|
Fall/Winter 2012
Canadian Arbitration and Mediation Journal
|
|
August 27, 2012
Texas Lawyer
|
|
June 2012
ABA DR Section, 7th Annual Arbitration Training Institute
|
|
June 2012
Just Resolutions
|
|
May 15, 2012
The Daily Journal
|
|
May 3, 2012
Inside Counsel
|
|
March 2012
Just Resolutions
|
|
December 5, 2016
|
|
November 15, 2016
|
|
October 13, 2016
|
|
October 9 - 11, 2016
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
September 20, 2016
|
|
September 13 - 15, 2016
|
|
September 12, 2016
|
|
August 25, 2016
|
|
August 4 - 9, 2016
|
|
June 29, 2016
|
|
June 13, 2016
|
|
June 2 – 3, 2016
|
|
May 25, 2016
|
|
March 21, 2016
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
|
February 23, 2016
|
|
February 3, 2016
|
|
February 1, 2016
|
|
January 28, 2016
|
|
January 22, 2016
|
|
January 22, 2016
|
|
November 19, 2015
|
|
November 19, 2015
|