This page documents some security topics for consideration by the Web Payments Working Group. See also the WG's Security review using the TAG checklist.

Confidentiality Violations

Motivation: Attacker wants to know about victims location or spending behavior

Attack Vector: Browser extension or compromised Javascript code

Attacker installs code to listen to PaymentRequestUpdateEvents and report contents of PaymentDetails to attacker website.

Motivation: Merchant wants to know exactly which payment methods are available for a given consumer

Attack Vector: repeated calls to PaymentRequest interface with a single payment method per request; monitoring those which succeed and which fail

Attacker dispatches multiple PaymentRequest calls, capturing when a request fails immediately (which would be an indication the payment method is not supported) and otherwise aborting the PaymentRequest if it does not fail immediately. Collect the results and then through business logic decide which payment methods to offer to this customer. Remember the information via a cookie for future use. Offer new payment methods to the consumer because the merchant knows they do not yet have those methods registered and the merchant prefers those methods (e.g., private card, card with loyalty points, card with better terms for the merchant).

Password Sniffing

No known password sniffing attacks

Offline Cryptographic Attacks

No known cryptographic attacks other than capture and brute force HTTPS.

Replay Attacks

Motivation: MitM wants to harm merchant by issuing previously processed PaymentResponses

Attack Vector: Browser extension or compromised Javascript code

Attacker installs code that store (via localStorage) and replay previous basic card spec payment responses.

Message Insertion

Motivation: MitM wants to mine victim data by requesting fields that merchant does not need.

Attack Vector: Browser extension or compromised Javascript code

Attacker installs code that modifies paymentOptions to request information that merchant does not need and then reports this back to attacker's servers.

Message Deletion

Motivation: MitM wants to reprioritize acceptable payment methods.

Attack Vector: Browser extension or compromised Javascript code

Attacker installs code that modifies the list of acceptable payment methods before sending them on to the mediator.

Message Modification

Motivation: MitM wants to harm merchant by modifying price charged by merchant.

Attack Vector: Browser extension or compromised Javascript code

Attacker installs code that modifies total amount displayed to user and then modifies the amount before it is sent to the mediator.

Man-In-The-Middle

Denial of Service

Code Injection

On-path Attacks

Off-path Attacks

Link-local Attacks