Agenda 20160428
Adrian Hope-Bailie edited this page Apr 28, 2016
·
11 revisions
Pages 87
- Home
- A Payments Initiation Architecture for the Web
- Adoption2017
- Agenda 12th November 2015 at 1700 UTC
- Agenda 17th December 2015 at 1700 UTC
- Agenda 19th November 2015 at 1700 UTC
- Agenda 20160107
- Agenda 20160121
- Agenda 20160128
- Agenda 20160204
- Agenda 20160211
- Agenda 20160310
- Agenda 20160317
- Agenda 20160331
- Agenda 20160407
- Agenda 20160414
- Agenda 20160421
- Agenda 20160428
- Agenda 20160505
- Agenda 20160512
- Agenda 20160519
- Agenda 20160526
- Agenda 20160602
- Agenda 20160609
- Agenda 20160616
- Agenda 20160623
- Agenda 20160728
- Agenda 20160804
- Agenda 20160811
- Agenda 20160818
- Agenda 20160825
- Agenda 20160901
- Agenda 20160908
- Agenda 20160915
- Agenda 20161006
- Agenda 20161020
- Agenda 20161027
- Agenda 20161103
- Agenda 20161110
- Agenda 20161117
- Agenda 20161201
- Agenda 20161208
- Agenda 20161215
- Agenda 20170105
- Agenda 20170112
- Agenda 20170119
- Agenda 20170126
- Agenda 20170202
- Agenda 20170209
- Agenda 20170216
- Agenda 3rd December 2015 at 1700 UTC
- Agenda for 3rd March telco
- All in the Browser
- Browser with remote Payment Apps
- Call for Consensus FPWD
- CFC_20140412
- Checkout API
- Components
- DeploymentExamples
- Extensibility_Notes
- F2F Agenda
- FTF March2017
- FTF Sep2016
- How it Works
- How the Working Group works
- Issue Summary
- MagWebinar
- Meeting Proposal 20161128
- Meetings
- Mobile Platform
- Networks List
- PaymentApp_Notes
- PaymentRequestFAQ
- PMI_Notes
- Proposed F2F Day 2 agenda
- RegistrationTypes
- Security and Privacy Considerations
- Spec_Notes
- Support for multi price and currency
- Synchronizing Github Issues with W3C Mailing Lists
- TestSuite
- TPAC 2015 issues list
- Web Payment Deployment Examples
- Web Payments Working Group FTF Meeting (July 2016)
- Web Payments Working Group Plan
- WPWG FTF Feb 2016
- WPWG FTF Feb 2016 Requirements
- Show 72 more pages…
Mailing list archives
Issues
- General
- Payment Request API
- Payment Method Identifiers
- Basic Card Payment
- Payment Apps API
- HTTP API and Messages
Tests
Adoption
Previous Topics
Clone this wiki locally
- Priorities (proposed, in order)
- Extensibility (and specifically payment app registration and architecture for browser-payment-api)
- Moving published working drafts forward and supporting implementations
- Widening the scope of our published work (HTTP API, additional payment methods)
- Face-to-face meeting update
- Original tentative workshop dates: 29-30 June clashed with W3C blockchain workshop
- Looking for non-conflicting FTF meeting in July in London
- Possible dates are:
- Wednesday 13th July and Thursday 14th July
- Monday 18th July and Tuesday 19th July
- Tuesday 19th July and Wednesday 20th July
- Questionnaire at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/83744/F2F_London/
-
Proposals (AHB) - marked with 28th April Milestone in Github
-
Complete()
- PR #161 Change from boolean to enum and update descriptions
- PR #153 Drop parameter
- Issue #129 complete does not talk to the Payment App
- Issue #122 Consider revising the design of complete()
- Issue #17 complete() should take a string argument not boolean
-
How total amount is passed in
-
PR #158 Move out of
itemswhich are nowdisplayItems. Leave as PaymentItem. - PR #133 Move to same parameter as payment method data. Expressed as array of CurrencyAmount to support multiple-amounts per currency
- Issue #18 Constructor should not include "total" in list of items
- Issue #3 Should it be possible to provide amounts in more than one currency
- Issue #4 Should it be possible to vary amounts depending on payment method
-
PR #158 Move out of
-
Merging of supported methods and method data
- PR #162 Merge list of payment methods with payment method data
-
PR #133 Merge list of payment methods with payment method data and requested amount. Move items and shippingOptions to
options - Issue #15 Combine API parameters into a single request object + options
- Issue #48 Should list of accepted payment methods be strings or objects?
-
Requesting user data
-
Issues (some implicit in proposal discussion)
- Issue #16 Use navigator.payments singleton, factory method, or PaymentRequest constructor
- Issue #19 Should the API handle pre-auth, recurring payments, and similar scenarios
- Issue #119 Support for negative amounts
- Issue #2 Should the Payment Request API only be available in a top-level browsing context?
-