Twitter | Hanapin | |
Michael Elleman
Sr. Fellow for Missile Defence at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. Expressed opinions are mine, re-tweets are not endorsements, agreement.
1,220
Mga Tweet
1,331
Mga Sinusundan
1,904
Mga Tagasunod
Mga Tweet
Michael Elleman 27 min.
Placing Iran attempt to launch a satellite in the proper perspective, and for ideas for reducing the risk of an Iranian ICBM, I recommend:
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman 35 min.
Further, the trajectory for a space launch is quite different that one used for ICBMs. Those tracking the flight will recognise early in flight the intended mission. See graph by David Wright comparing the NK Unha and ICBM flight profiles.
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman 44 min.
Sumasagot kay @FHeisbourg @GeraldNGOM
The first stage of this SLV uses low-energy, Scud propellants which is why it is so big (~75 tons), and ill-suited for use on a mobile ICBM; fixed sites are too vulnerable. If Iran wants an ICBM, it will exploit Khorramshahr hardware, which employs high-energy fuels.
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Ni-retweet ni Michael Elleman
Mark Fitzpatrick 17 oras
Come hear our assessment of the nuclear deal and its missile programs, Jan 17 at 10:30 am, 2121 K St NW, WashDC.
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Ni-retweet ni Michael Elleman
Arman Dashti 20 oras
Smells like shutdown spirit
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Ni-retweet ni Michael Elleman
IISS News 23 oras
Save the date: 2 top non-proliferation experts will discuss the future of ’s nuclear deal, the . Join and in Washington DC for the launch of their Adelphi book:
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 14
But the first satellite launch attempt I am aware of was February 2008, not 2005. First successful attempt was Feb 2009. Perhaps a prototype launcher was seen on the ground in 2005??
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Ni-retweet ni Michael Elleman
Geoff Brumfiel Ene 14
Once a day, little satellites zip over northern Iran and snap a few photos of Iran’s spaceport. Activity is up, but what are they launching? (Imagery by , analysis by and )
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 14
Tweet of the day. I know will love it!
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 13
Sumasagot kay @RLHeinrichs
Not you, but at Individual 1
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 13
Sumasagot kay @RLHeinrichs
Good luck with that strategy.
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 13
Sumasagot kay @RLHeinrichs
But what about that Singapore meeting, and his confession of love for KJU?
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 13
And, he missed the ball...
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 13
Yep, it’s worth recalling.
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 13
Typical entertainment on the Metro? Not really. But, it is impressive!
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 11
You informed me two decades ago about how the USG views PR, and to my alarm, I witnessed it. But I never imagined that a sitting US president would threaten to be this callous to the great people of Puerto Rico. Words cannot capture my full outrage.
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 11
+1 I find this mildly amusing, but wonder how Bahraini officials reacted.
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 11
Sumasagot kay @TheAndyHolland
The Irony: It was the Reagan administration that first employed economic incentives, like cap and trade emissions credits to compel companies to meet many of the 1980s, non-CO2 pollution standards. It was Reagan's free-market (reduced gov't) solution. Seems sensible now for CO2.
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 11
Sumasagot kay @Robert_Hx @shannonrwatts
He was an opportunist, feeding at everyone's trough. He also supported every proposal to militarily intervene in the Middle East, regardless of the potential unintended or likely negative consequences.
Reply Retweet Gustuhin
Michael Elleman Ene 11
Try surfing in California: see video!
Reply Retweet Gustuhin