Frank Harrell

@f2harrell

Prof, Founding Chair of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt U. Expert Statistical Advisor, Office of Biostatistics, FDA CDER. Blog: Statistical Thinking -fharrell.com

Дата приєднання: січень 2017

Твіти

Ви заблокували @f2harrell

Ви впевнені, що хочете переглянути ці твіти? Перегляд твітів не розблокує профіль @f2harrell

  1. ретвітнув(ла)
    19 годин тому

    1. Shut down 2. Jail key decision makers and possibly some of the engineers involved 3. Give the money back to the people it abused (its users) 4. Build ethical replacements for its useful bits

    Показати цей потік
    Скасувати
  2. 16 годин тому

    Glad that has restarted this hot discussion on datamethods. I just posted a response that tries to generalize the question.

    Скасувати
  3. ретвітнув(ла)
    19 груд.

    Statistically, machine learning has poor modeling practices which should limit generalizability. It doesn't. Why? For tasks like image recognition, all humans on the ML team understand ground truth; in healthcare/science tasks, it won't be the same. We can expect lots of failure.

    Скасувати
  4. ретвітнув(ла)
    23 години тому

    My Christmas present for the community: 2.7 is now on CRAN extending support for Gaussian processes and fixing a substantial performance bug in some post-processing methods among other new features and improvements.

    Скасувати
  5. ретвітнув(ла)
    17 груд.

    Please read—well worth your time. Challenges of Non–Intention-to-Treat Analyses | Research, Methods, Statistics | JAMA | JAMA Network

    Скасувати
  6. ретвітнув(ла)
    17 груд.

    It's a big stretch to put such a positive spin on the wastage of resources that occurs when the scientific pathway is led astray building upon results that can't be replicated.

    Скасувати
  7. 17 груд.

    Glad to see questionable research practices elevated with respect to severity of harm to science

    Скасувати
  8. ретвітнув(ла)
    17 груд.

    A+ beautiful, a grand achievement by it is wonderful to see Byrne on clean background, all the original copies I saw over the years all had extensive foxing. In my Envisioning Information, we fully rebuilt 2 Byrne pages, hand-separated colors for printing.

    Скасувати
  9. ретвітнув(ла)
    16 груд.

    Let me get this straight: Sears has $25 million laying around to pay out executives who ran the company into the ground, but doesn't have any money to give the thousands of workers they laid off severance pay?

    Скасувати
  10. ретвітнув(ла)
    15 груд.

    Tonight’s ruling creates confusion, puts affordable health insurance at risk, and targets Americans with pre-existing conditions. The Supreme Court already upheld the law’s constitutionality — twice. Sign up tonight for 2019 coverage at .

    Скасувати
  11. ретвітнув(ла)
    14 груд.

    "It took more than a half century to reach the point where faced with a choice between democracy and power, the party chose the latter," argues George Packer.

    Скасувати
  12. ретвітнув(ла)
    14 груд.

    Didn’t he impeach Bill Clinton over the same thing?

    Показати цей потік
    Скасувати
  13. ретвітнув(ла)
    14 груд.

    A couple days ago another team asked me to speak about Bayesian data analysis. I decided that instead of doing a nuts/bolts of how to fit/use Bayesian models, I would describe "Bayesian analysis: The Good Parts". <potentially controversial thread>

    Показати цей потік
    Скасувати
  14. ретвітнув(ла)
    13 груд.

    Not that this is terribly surprising, but still an important message for all to hear.

    Скасувати
  15. ретвітнув(ла)
    12 груд.

    Invite others to submit their lists of prevalent faux-pas' compromising reliable evidence generation.

    Скасувати
  16. ретвітнув(ла)
    12 груд.

    Hi everyone. It’s been awhile since I’ve had a good old-fashioned methods critique, but I'm feeling it today:

    Показати цей потік
    Скасувати
  17. 12 груд.

    Many Analysts, One Data Set – many conclusions - good discussion continues. Hope that joins in -

    Скасувати
  18. 11 груд.

    Favorite way to picture probabilities: not with stick figures or frequencies but with a thermometer plot (example below is taken from )

    Скасувати
  19. 11 груд.

    Statistician take of the day: A $100 data analysis can make a $1,000,000 study worth $1,000.

    Скасувати
  20. 11 груд.

    What the GOP stands for ...

    Скасувати

Схоже, завантаження займе трохи часу.

Можливо, Твіттер перенавантажено або виникли тимчасові труднощі. Спробуйте ще раз або дізнайтеся більше про стан Твіттера.

    Вам також може сподобатись

    ·