Frank Harrell

@f2harrell

Prof, Founding Chair of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt U. Expert Statistical Advisor, Office of Biostatistics, FDA CDER. Blog: Statistical Thinking -fharrell.com

Registrerte seg januar 2017

Tweets

Du har blokkert @f2harrell

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@f2harrell.

  1. Retweetet

    1. Shut down 2. Jail key decision makers and possibly some of the engineers involved 3. Give the money back to the people it abused (its users) 4. Build ethical replacements for its useful bits

    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  2. for 16 timer siden

    Glad that has restarted this hot discussion on datamethods. I just posted a response that tries to generalize the question.

    Angre
  3. Retweetet
    19. des.

    Statistically, machine learning has poor modeling practices which should limit generalizability. It doesn't. Why? For tasks like image recognition, all humans on the ML team understand ground truth; in healthcare/science tasks, it won't be the same. We can expect lots of failure.

    Angre
  4. Retweetet
    for 23 timer siden

    My Christmas present for the community: 2.7 is now on CRAN extending support for Gaussian processes and fixing a substantial performance bug in some post-processing methods among other new features and improvements.

    Angre
  5. Retweetet
    17. des.

    Please read—well worth your time. Challenges of Non–Intention-to-Treat Analyses | Research, Methods, Statistics | JAMA | JAMA Network

    Angre
  6. Retweetet
    17. des.

    It's a big stretch to put such a positive spin on the wastage of resources that occurs when the scientific pathway is led astray building upon results that can't be replicated.

    Angre
  7. 17. des.

    Glad to see questionable research practices elevated with respect to severity of harm to science

    Angre
  8. Retweetet
    17. des.

    A+ beautiful, a grand achievement by it is wonderful to see Byrne on clean background, all the original copies I saw over the years all had extensive foxing. In my Envisioning Information, we fully rebuilt 2 Byrne pages, hand-separated colors for printing.

    Angre
  9. Retweetet
    16. des.

    Let me get this straight: Sears has $25 million laying around to pay out executives who ran the company into the ground, but doesn't have any money to give the thousands of workers they laid off severance pay?

    Angre
  10. Retweetet
    15. des.

    Tonight’s ruling creates confusion, puts affordable health insurance at risk, and targets Americans with pre-existing conditions. The Supreme Court already upheld the law’s constitutionality — twice. Sign up tonight for 2019 coverage at .

    Angre
  11. Retweetet
    14. des.

    "It took more than a half century to reach the point where faced with a choice between democracy and power, the party chose the latter," argues George Packer.

    Angre
  12. Retweetet

    Didn’t he impeach Bill Clinton over the same thing?

    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  13. Retweetet
    14. des.

    A couple days ago another team asked me to speak about Bayesian data analysis. I decided that instead of doing a nuts/bolts of how to fit/use Bayesian models, I would describe "Bayesian analysis: The Good Parts". <potentially controversial thread>

    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  14. Retweetet
    13. des.

    Not that this is terribly surprising, but still an important message for all to hear.

    Angre
  15. Retweetet
    12. des.

    Invite others to submit their lists of prevalent faux-pas' compromising reliable evidence generation.

    Angre
  16. Retweetet
    12. des.

    Hi everyone. It’s been awhile since I’ve had a good old-fashioned methods critique, but I'm feeling it today:

    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  17. 12. des.

    Many Analysts, One Data Set – many conclusions - good discussion continues. Hope that joins in -

    Angre
  18. 11. des.

    Favorite way to picture probabilities: not with stick figures or frequencies but with a thermometer plot (example below is taken from )

    Angre
  19. 11. des.

    Statistician take of the day: A $100 data analysis can make a $1,000,000 study worth $1,000.

    Angre
  20. 11. des.

    What the GOP stands for ...

    Angre

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·