dblp

@dblp_org

dblp computer science bibliography. Michael Wager ~MW, Marcel R. Ackermann ~MRA

Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany
dblp.org
Joined May 2013
15 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @dblp_org

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @dblp_org

  1. May 9

    Servers and should be up and running again. We are sorry for the inconvenience. ~MRA

    2 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. May 9

    We are currently experiencing some issues with servers at and . In the mean time while we are working on a solution, please use server . Thanks for your patience! ~MRA

    1 reply 1 retweet
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. May 3

    A new snapshot release of the data set has been published.

    3 retweets 7 likes
    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    Apr 29

    Where are/were persons with profile educated? Try live query at (Note that data is only available for a small sample of all profiles)

    3 retweets 6 likes
    Undo
  5. Apr 24

    "Towards Persistent Identification of Conferences" - blog post about the ongoing work of the & working group on open PIDs for conferences.

    7 retweets 16 likes
    Undo
  6. Apr 2

    A new snapshot release of the data set has been published.

    1 retweet 14 likes
    Undo
  7. Mar 4

    A new snapshot release of the data set has been published.

    1 retweet 4 likes
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    Feb 26

    This has probably been asked before: Is there a DBLP mode for emacs that lets me search DBLP and insert a reference into my bibliography?

    3 replies 3 retweets 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Feb 20

    A look at the journal processing pipeline. Each file is at least one journal issue waiting to be processed. Notice a pattern :-) Good thing we have more help now.

    5 retweets 8 likes
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    Feb 14

    Highlighted excerpts, from the paper available at written by , involving directly , , & in the discussion about vs closed citations

    7 retweets 5 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Feb 10

    Number of vs. closed citations (according to + as of Oct 2018) to publications, grouped by publisher. More info at , data on

    1 reply 11 retweets 6 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Feb 5

    About 11% of available references in records in our OAI-PMH & REST API don’t have DOIs when they should. We have deployed a fix. Read all about it in a new blog by , 'Underreporting of matched references in Crossref ',

    1 reply 12 retweets 13 likes
    Undo
  13. Feb 4

    A new snapshot release of the data set has been published.

    1 retweet 2 likes
    Undo
  14. Feb 1

    We are still putting a lot of effort in improving the effectiveness of the manual curation of the bibliographies listed at . 2018 saw another bit of improvement in that field, too. Thanks to all of you who made us aware of errors during the past year!

    3 retweets 14 likes
    Undo
  15. Jan 30

    During 2018, saw another significant increase in the number of linked and verified external identifiers (, , and more). We are now approaching 100.000 verified pids in total.

    8 retweets 21 likes
    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    Jan 24

    Slides of teh conf PID session are now online: , , ,

    3 retweets 2 likes
    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Jan 22

    New blog post: Sampling papers published in software engineering conference proceedings and journals using data from .

    1 reply 6 retweets 9 likes
    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    Jan 16

    Just to set the record straight on a few questions raised on this thread: • the I4OC was not designed to create a "Scopus-killer". It is not a technology roadmap, it is an advocacy initiative to make citation data part of the public domain so that they belong to everyone. /1

    Replying to @mrgunn @joshmnicholson and 5 others
    I would hope and expect I4OC to be neutral with regard to usage of open citation data.
    1 reply 17 retweets 34 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    Jan 12

    Want to learn more about conference IDentifiers & how to adopt them in your organization? Or want to share your use cases for conference PIDs? Join our session at

    6 retweets 4 likes
    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    Jan 4

    ...sources of author information (almost 10 times more external identifiers interlinked with author profiles), >10 times (mostly automatic) exclusions of publications from authors (despite homonymous signatures), and a significant decrease of ambiguous assignments.

    1 retweet 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo

@dblp_org hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·