Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Specific composition questions and general post-processing questions (including style recreation/emulation questions) should be directed to either the stickied Official Questions thread, or /r/postprocessing.
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Ok. Well best Camera in your opinion for battery life, storage capabilities, and lens upgrades? I'm not looking for a specific camera. My only requirement is under $600...... I want personal opinions of what works for someone. Not looking for a camera based on paid reviews on Amazon.....I have no "camera stores" close. Only Amazon, pawn shops, and eBay. Which is why I was looking for personal reviews on any camera! I live in rural Appalachia. There's literally nothing here......Yes, think redneckville usa.....sorry maybe I'm just too stupid for this!
Well best Camera in your opinion for battery life, storage capabilities, and lens upgrades?
All modern DSLRs are very good in all of those aspects.
Hi all,
I have a dilemma to decide which one should I get first? I am planning to get 70-200mm lens since that lens would fit in my photography needs. On the other hand, I also want to upgrade my computer because it is outdated and it struggles to process my images. I currently use MacbookPro 2014 version. I'm planning to get the 2017 iMac.
Can anyone help me here?
Thanks in advance.
I have a dilemma to decide which one should I get first? I am planning to get 70-200mm lens since that lens would fit in my photography needs. On the other hand, I also want to upgrade my computer because it is outdated and it struggles to process my images. I currently use MacbookPro 2014 version. I'm planning to get the 2017 iMac.
Can anyone help me here?
Nope. You're going to have to decide which is more important to you. There's no way anyone here can decide this for you.
Load more comments
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
I’m not a professional. I’m not even good. I just enjoy shooting to the best of my ability all the stuff around me. This is MY TAKE. If you disagree, tell me why, I’d love to hear it. However, a “you’re wrong and your opinion is stupid” isn’t helpful to anyone, me, you, or the one other person that will read this.
Nobody is allowed to disagree with this. It's a perfectly valid opinion and has a basis in reality. The truth is, if you enjoy doing something to the best of your ability then that's all that matters with any hobby. Good for you.
He starts off with the normal “this magic box is a film camera, go buy one on ebay or ask your grandparents if they have one.” Yeah, he actually told us to ask our grandparents if they still had their cameras stowed away somewhere, but I digress.
That's actually great advice. When it comes to film cameras, the body is almost completely irrelevant. The magic comes from the lens and the film. The body is just the light-tight box that carries the signal.
I hate grain, with every fiber of my being.
No, no no no... I just had this conversation earlier today about how certain film stocks - especially B&W - offer lovely grain that produces photos which would never be the same if they were clean digital images with no grain/noise.
But looking at how actual grain looked, it just felt… right. Like the grain itself belonged with the photograph, instead of being a limitation of the technology.
DING! This. Precisely.
Reading your post warms my heart. As someone whose first camera was a crappy 110 camera that I experimented and had a lot of fun with but ended up giving up photography almost entirely until getting a 1.0 Megapixel HP C200 camera nearly 20 years ago and rediscovering the love and THEN getting back into film in a big way, your attitude is so on the mark it's not even funny. Good on you.
For as much as digital photography is wonderful and useful, I would encourage you and everyone reading this who is deeply interested in photography to also consider film photography as a side endeavor. It is so much fun and like /u/Notenough1997 has so thoroughly described, it adds such an incredible depth to your work that can't be duplicated any other way.
Thank you for this post.
I think we just found the way through /u/ccurzio's gruff exterior, guys. Big up film 😁
Ccurzio, Ccurzio, I've got three film cameras. A 1920s Kodak Vest model (impossible to get film for), a little 60s Agfa rangefinder, and a Ricoh X-r2. Love me, love me!
A 1920s Kodak Vest model (impossible to get film for)
FYI if you really want to use it, it's possible to hack 35mm film into them. :)
Load more comments
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
You realize it's an invisible laser, right? The photographer would have had no way of knowing where it was pointing. You can't show up to an event to show your product off to the press and have it destroy cameras without warning. This is the fault of AEye, not the photographer.
You realize it's an invisible laser, right? The photographer would have had no way of knowing where it was pointing.
If you read further into the conversation you would see that yes, I (and many others) are well aware of that.
My comment was purely "Yep, lasers can destroy sensors." Nothing more.
You can't show up to an event to show your product off to the press and have it destroy cameras without warning. This is the fault of AEye, not the photographer.
At no point did I assign blame to the photographer.
The issue here is that LiDAR lasers are invisible to human eyes (900 - 1570nm), so there's no way to actively avoid them because you probably won't even know they are there.
The issue here is that LiDAR lasers are invisible to human eyes (900 - 1570nm), so there's no way to actively avoid them because you probably won't even know they are there.
I'm aware of that. The comment was asking how to avoid lasers in club/concert environments.
You can't exactly "predict laser movements" when you can't see the lasers.
Load more comments
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Negative
Based on this I finally added that new FAQ entry I've been talking about for a while.
Is this thing in my photo a ghost/supernatural phenomenon?
Screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/m6ocHJN.jpg
P.S.: "My flash was not on!" Yes it was.
This sub always has a special place in my heart. I have got to know a lot of you here and I am sure with these changes there are a lot more that we can learn from each other which in turn will make us better photographers :D Great stuff here, mod teams! :D
I'm very supportive of these changes. Thank you.
I'm not the most active Redditor, but this is the sub I'm probably most active on.
I love the various photo subs and am eager to join r/photographs. It's a nice catch-all, even if it's similar to ITAP.
One sub I tend to avoid is r/photocritique. Mostly because the critiques I see aren't. Is there some sort of critique or advice component that could be added to r/photographs, such as post tags?
Generally you'll have a really hard time finding any sort of meaningful critique on a generic forum like Reddit. (There's a reason that real critique is often a paid service. It actually takes significant time and effort, and the people who would be able to do it for real aren't looking to waste much time doing it for free.)
Sadly, that's a problem that would just as easily carry over to /r/photographs.
Please don't let it discourage you from sharing, however. There are many people in our community that might pop over to offer something if you raise a concern in one of our community threads. And in either case, we'd love to see your work.
Thanks.
Load more comments
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Your submission has been removed from r/photography.
Please post your question as a comment in the Official Questions Thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Before posting, please check our extensive FAQ, your question may already have been answered!
Hi I just had a quick question that perhaps this community can answer.
Welcome to /r/photography. Quick questions is exactly why we have a questions thread. Next time please be sure to read the rules before posting. I've removed your post.
To answer your question (briefly), you would be much better off taking the photo to be scanned. Once you have the digital file, you can print it to any size you like. (Since you're looking to print smaller, that would be pretty easy to accomplish.)
Please use the questions thread if you have any further questions. Thanks.
Your submission has been removed from /r/photography.
This is an incredibly commonly-asked question here and there are many, many previous discussions on the subject. I would encourage you to search the archives to look for other discussions and solutions, and then feel free to post in the questions thread if you have any specific questions.
Thanks.
Your submission has been removed from /r/photography.
Please read the rules and the FAQ before posting.
Questions asking for help (including equipment purchasing advice) should be posted as comments in the most recent Official Question thread, stickied at the top of the subreddit.
Thank you.