Twitter | ಹುಡುಕು | |
Sam Vinograd
national security analyst NSCer + digester of all things policy. Author of Presidential Weekly Briefing IG:
16,652
ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳು
3,013
ಹಿಂಬಾಲಿಸುತ್ತಿರುವವರು
46,610
ಹಿಂಬಾಲಕರು
ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳು
Sam Vinograd 40 ನಿಮಿ
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @Andrew__Roth
( is he hoping to avoid a redeploment if the assets he used to interfere with the first referendum?)
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 48 ನಿಮಿ
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @FBI @TheJusticeDept
Great work
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
FBI 1 ಗಂ.
: Director Wray joins in announcing a national security action involving China. .
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
FBI 1 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @FBI
Director Wray: China’s goal, simply put, is to replace the U.S. as the world’s leading superpower – and they’re using illegal methods to get there.
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
Jim Sciutto 1 ಗಂ.
Breaking: DOJ announces charges against two Chinese nationals for “computer intrusions” against dozens of companies in the US and around the world - Dep AG Rosenstein
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 1 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @sam_vinograd
The coalition fighting ISIS in Syria has assets both inside and outside Syria. Questions include: whether we are cutting and running from all of our coalition responsibilities or just the one inside Syria and whether another coalition member will pick up our mission slack?
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 1 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @DeptofDefense
yesterday said we’d remain part of the coalition fighting ISIS ...
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
Pavlo Klimkin 5 ಗಂ.
Russian hybrid threat remains hybrid: disinformation, social unrest and election meddling. As Ukraine prepares for elections, Putin will be looking to destabilize,delegitimize and disrupt the process at every possible turn.The stakes are increasingly high
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 2 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @sam_vinograd
Up to Iran, Syria, and Russia to fight an enemy that has the proven intent and capability to attack the United States.
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 2 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @WhiteHouse
The President’s stated reason for our withdrawal has now been undercut by ... the President. This is not how to implement counterterrorism strategies or to signal cohesion. While the comms team reworks their talking points ( from yesterday ), POTUS just said that it’s
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
Sam Vinograd 2 ಗಂ.
Let’s be clear - the President said yesterday that ISIS is defeated. Today, less than 24 hours later, he acknowledged that they are still there by tweeting that it’s now up to Iran, Russia and Assad to fight them.
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 2 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @StateDept
It’s a coalition made up of 79 team members. We weren’t fighting ISIS alone. From the website here’s the list
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 2 ಗಂ.
Let’s be clear - the President said yesterday that ISIS is defeated. Today, less than 24 hours later, he acknowledged that they are still there by tweeting that it’s now up to Iran, Russia and Assad to fight them.
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 2 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @StateDept
Plus, many furloughed employees work on actuallys strategically tackling the drivers of illegal immigration ie
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 2 ಗಂ.
While the President tweets about shutting down our government over border security remember that shutting down the Govt would actually hurt our security. We’d be operating with 380K less staff while every other Govt has their full team on the field.
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 2 ಗಂ.
Putin literally just said he is happy we are leaving. Keep in mind - we were part of a 70+ coalition to fight ISIS. So is the President saying we aren’t just leaving Syria but leaving the coalition??
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 3 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @christinawilkie
2. Our forces in Korea aren’t just there Bc of North Korean nukes. They have a broader mission
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 3 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @christinawilkie
Let's hope someone is reminding the President that this is not a quid pro quo that should be considered on any level. 1. One of these things is not like the other: North Korean nukes are illegal under intl law; US troops are legally in the RoK.
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd 3 ಗಂ.
ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @realDonaldTrump
The President is bringing our troops in Syria home - who are fighting a real, dangerous enemy - while he's keeping US troops at the border who are not doing the same.
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ
Sam Vinograd ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
Christina Wilkie 10 ಗಂ.
NEW: North Korea says it won't denuclearize unless the US removes its troops and nuclear umbrella from South Korea and Japan. DPRK also accused the US and Trump of misleading the world about what was agreed to at the Singapore talks last summer.
Reply Retweet ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಿ