Tweets

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	9 okt.
	Als antwoord op @akallaur @mashagessen Thank you!
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	4 okt.
	Als antwoord op @IsaacQureshi Thank you, Isaac. That is awesome. Very honored to make the top 10! Please don't read any more book, as they might knock me out.
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	29 sep.
	Als antwoord op @RobinVandome Whoa!
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen heeft geretweet
	Teddy Amenabar @TeddyAmen	27 sep.
	On cable news right now: MSNBC FORD: "100%" CERTAIN THAT KAVANAUGH ASSAULTED ME CNN FORD: 100% CERTAIN IT WAS KAVANAUGH WHO ASSAULTED ME FOX FORD: CANNOT FORGET THE LAUGHTER BETWEEN JUDGE AND KAVANAUGH FROM THAT NIGHT wapo.st/2xGrGS2
	Overzicht bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen heeft geretweet
	Andrew Roth @Andrew__Roth	27 sep.
	2018 in a nutshell: Russia put a decorated officer and war veteran on RT to pretend to be a traveling nutritional supplements salesman on holiday to Salisbury so that Margo Simonyan could suggest he's really covering up for the fact that he is gay. theguardian.com/world/2018/sep…
	Overzicht bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	26 sep.
	Als antwoord op @keithgessen And a quick Google search reveals that Kagan, Roberts, and Sotomayor all graduated summa cum laude from their respective undergraduate institutions. As did... Merrick Garland.
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	26 sep.
	Als antwoord op @eric_weinberger Well that was after the crackdown, so I'd say, pretty good!
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	26 sep.
	Lol at conservatives claiming Kavanaugh couldn’t have done all this b/c he graduated cum laude! For someone who went to an elite high school to then graduate cum laude from Yale in 1987 was in fact a sign of heavy drinking—as Yale itself soon realized. pic.twitter.com/wzHcZpQT8w
	Foto bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	26 sep.
	Als antwoord op @dhere Yeah, not to mention they won the whole thing as recently as 2014. This person knows nothing about hockey.
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	26 sep.
	Als antwoord op @davidhajdu_ It’s awful. For the moment at least you can revert to classic gmail, as shown here: pic.twitter.com/dJuBaYa2DN
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	24 sep.
	In the event that Rosenstein does not get fired, I urge everyone to come to the library tomorrow (Tuesday) to talk about life in Russia, authoritarianism, hockey, literature, and the CIA, with me and Mike Vasquez. nypl.org/events/program…
	Overzicht bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	24 sep.
	Als antwoord op @keithgessen You still have your scoop. You still get to suggest that Rosenstein's ideas were pretty far out. But you also put it in context, which is, on one end, the Comey firing, and on the other, the Mueller appointment. Then ppl can discuss whether Rosenstein's suggestions went too far.
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	24 sep.
	Als antwoord op @keithgessen For the record, I think the responsible way to run that story would have been under a headline along the lines of: "Eight Days in May." The first graf could have been: pic.twitter.com/tEGc3MQJnt
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	24 sep.
	Als antwoord op @DavidKlion One of the NYT reporters on the story also tweeted something to this effect yesterday--at least I think he did, as I can no longer find it. It's an interesting defense of their story: "Don't worry, Trump is too preoccupied to notice what we ran on our front page!"
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	24 sep.
	So it looks like Twitter was right about the NYT Rosenstein story. Again!
	Details bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	24 sep.
	Hello daycare my old friend.
	Details bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	22 sep.
	Als antwoord op @EmilyGould But I’m still mad tho!
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	22 sep.
	Als antwoord op @jacklgoldsmith Goldsmith compares it to the Strzok/Page texts—not actually harmful but they look bad, a violation of “norms.” Whereas in fact this is like the Hillary emails or her server—a refusal by the press (led by NYT) and liberal elites to contextualize and have a sense of proporion.
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	22 sep.
	Als antwoord op @jacklgoldsmith What would “insubordination” mean in the context of Rosenstein being in charge of an investigation (election meddling, obstruction of justice) of which his boss (Trump) is a likely target?
	Gesprek bekijken ·

	Keith Gessen @keithgessen	22 sep.
	Als antwoord op @jacklgoldsmith This passage from @jacklgoldsmith lays out why Rosenstein’s comments, even if he didn’t follow up on them, could be fireable, but I’m not convinced. pic.twitter.com/iWJqIemK2D
	Gesprek bekijken ·