|
Jonathan Bernstein
@
jbview
|
|
Bloomberg Opinion. Also, I root for the Giants.
|
|
|
५१,३४८
ट्विट्स
|
२७५
फॉलोइंग
|
१४,३८१
फॉलोअर्स
|
| ट्विट्स |
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१० मिनि |
|
I don't care what he says. I care a lot about the lousy news judgement by broadcast and cable news outlets in giving all this exposure to someone who otherwise would have about the same chance as Vermin Supreme. twitter.com/ElizLanders/st…
|
||
|
||
| Jonathan Bernstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले | ||
|
Molly Reynolds
@mollyereynolds
|
१ ता |
|
Since I'm in the periodic friendly reminder mood again today, know that this (delaying nomination votes by a week) is standard practice for the Senate Judiciary Committee. twitter.com/nakashimae/sta…
|
||
|
|
||
| Jonathan Bernstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले | ||
|
Hans Noel
@ProfHansNoel
|
१ ता |
|
Thread. Read this @HowardSchultz. twitter.com/kwcollins/stat…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१२ ता |
|
Thanks! Don't forget @DPolisciprof @johnmsides @vavreck @ProfHansNoel too. twitter.com/joshHuder/stat…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१३ ता |
|
Although even with that a Dem candidate should probably say the first-day agenda is ripping up a bunch of Trump exec actions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१३ ता |
|
Saying the first thing you would do as president is to pass a bill is...not quite correct (although signaling priorities is fine in this context).
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१३ ता |
|
It's now a 60-minutes in question!
|
||
|
|
||
| Jonathan Bernstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले | ||
|
Kelly Stone
@kellystone6
|
१३ ता |
|
Which is a problem for the party (in addition to the country). We should have a debate around what a progressive foreign policy is, not just what it isn’t.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१३ ता |
|
Amazing that Dems can *legitimately* duck virtually every tough foreign policy question this cycle by (as Harris is mostly doing) saying that the president should read briefing papers and consult experts.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१३ ता |
|
Harris seems on the surface to be pretty up on policy, but I'm not sure if she understands the vital importance of walls and wheels and what fundamental inventions they are.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१४ ता |
|
Just observing, not judging.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१४ ता |
|
Iowa Dem audience (on CNN) seems a lot more energetic for Trump-bashing than for any policy stuff Harris has.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१४ ता |
|
Harris's response to liberals on criminal justice reform is most definitely (lots of) prose, not poetry. No idea how it sounds to those who care about it and are worried about her, but she certainly is ready to go on it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१४ ता |
|
Third. Not second.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१४ ता |
|
Please let there be a faction that's ready to split off and form the Caucus For House Freedom. twitter.com/HouseInSession…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१५ ता |
|
We *really* need to see if Schultz does as well as @emayfarris in 3rd party ballot tests. twitter.com/NateSilver538/…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१५ ता |
|
What @BrendanNyhan said. Odds are *very* good that Dem party actors will get a nominee acceptable to them (and to most Dem voters). twitter.com/BrendanNyhan/s…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१५ ता |
|
So I'm with @NateSilver538 (I think?) on this: Better to just not, at least until there's some reason to think Schultz is anything more than, say, Vermin Supreme.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१५ ता |
|
The one thing Schultz does have going for him is that a lot of media folks are extremely impressed with very rich people, which does have a bit of self-fulfillment in it (the $$$ doesn't make a candidate viable, but media slobbering over them can help).
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jonathan Bernstein
@jbview
|
१५ ता |
|
On the politics point....it is a good cycle for a relatively strong 3rd party candidate. However (1) there's a long, long way from Anderson-type numbers or even Perot to actually winning, and (2) it's hard to see what Schultz has going for him that would get him to that level. twitter.com/HotlineJosh/st…
|
||
|
|
||