Twitter | Szukaj | |
SCOTUSblog
A private blog. NOT THE JUSTICES OR THE COURT. Contact: [email protected].
7 833
Tweety
40
Obserwowani
302 228
Obserwujący
Tweety
SCOTUSblog 1 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @SCOTUSblog
holds ban is within president's authority under immigration laws and challengers are unlikely to prevail on establishment clause claim because the ban is justified by legitimate national-security concerns
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 1 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in Trump v. Hawaii:
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 1 godz.
rules for Trump administration, rejects challenge to Sept 2017
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 1 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in NIFLA v. Becerra:
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 1 godz.
blocks California law requiring anti-abortion nonprofits to inform pregnant patients about availability of free or low-cost abortions elsewhere & inability to provide medical help
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 2 godz.
opinions coming in under 10 minutes. We're live-blogging w/ at this link:
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 2 godz.
will release one or more of its final four opinions this morning. We're live-blogging w/ &
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 21 godz.
Today ruled for Texas in dispute alleging some electoral districts had been racially gerrymandered. Today’s ruling means that elections this year will likely go forward using the existing maps. has our analysis in Abbott v. Perez
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
W odpowiedzi do @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in Ohio v. American Express:
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
holds 5-4 that American Express' anti-steering rules do not violate federal antitrust law.
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
W odpowiedzi do @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in Abbott v. Perez:
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
In Texas racial gerrymandering case, throws out lower court ruling finding state’s maps discriminated against minority voters with respect to three challenged districts, finds remaining district is an impermissible racial gerrymander
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
In Masterpiece Cakeshop, justices held decisionmakers in case of baker who declined to create cake for same-sex wedding had exhibited anti-religious bias
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
sends North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering case back to lower courts to reconsider in light of Gill v. Whitford, in which justices held last week that plaintiffs had not shown standing to challenge statewide map
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
sends challenge by florist who refused to do flowers for same-sex wedding back to lower courts to reconsider in light of Masterpiece Cakeshop
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
grants seven new cases today.
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
At today we're getting orders at 9:30 & opinions in argued cases at 10. Join us at this link with
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 25 cze
W odpowiedzi do @AbuKedem
Hi, that was Justice Alito. Here's our case page for Pereira v. Sessions:
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 22 cze
rejects “dual-officeholding” challenge to military conviction, with our analysis in Ortiz v. US
Reply Retweet Lubię
SCOTUSblog 22 cze
"Today the Supreme Court ruled that...police will generally need to get a warrant to obtain cell-site location information, a record of the cell towers (or other sites) with which a cellphone connected," writes in her analysis of Carpenter v. US
Reply Retweet Lubię