Twitter | Search | |
Meni Rosenfeld
495
Tweets
1
Following
1,421
Followers
Tweets
Meni Rosenfeld 1m
Replying to @davidgerard
7. You are not the first to proclaim that Bitcoin has failed, and you won't be the last. I like the saying that if you see obstacles, it means you have looked away from the goal.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 1m
Replying to @davidgerard
6. I don't expect Bitcoin to *destroy* governments and banks, but it can materially change them. It hasn't happened yet, we're still early in Bitcoin's life.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 1m
Replying to @davidgerard
5. Bitcoin is now only one in thousands of currencies, but still commands 40% of the market cap. So just copy-pasting a currency is not as easy as you make it out to be.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 2m
Replying to @davidgerard
4. Platforms such as Bitrated offer a better solution than traditional chargebacks. Losing your coins due to a mistake is very difficult.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 2m
Replying to @davidgerard
3. The "no reason to spend in deflationary currency" is a myth. I have debunked it in a post in Hebrew, I might write an English version sometime. Usage in practice is still not so frequent, but that will improve.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 2m
Replying to @davidgerard
2. "Bitcoin transactions have been slow, unpredictable and expensive since" is a lie, you can now pay $0.1 and get confirmed in reasonable time. And let's not forget future upgrades such as Lightning network, and protocol changes you can put into Bitcoin.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 3m
Replying to @davidgerard
1. Mining centralization is a real problem, but should be resolved as the network grows and mining becomes more commoditized.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 16m
Replying to @PareenL
I don't think "complexity" is what matters here. CPUs are complex, but I don't need to understand their architecture to choose one, I just need to see performance test results.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 18m
Replying to @Lawlerpalooza
This incentive might encourage people to spend more time understanding the latter. Also, it's not that critical for every single person to understand it, it's more about humanity understanding it as a collective.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 19m
Replying to @Lawlerpalooza
Maybe. But the difference is that there is no incentive for an ordinary person to understand electromagnetism (they can choose the best bulb without it just fine), while there is an incentive to understand the blockchain, for the reasons I mentioned.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 26m
Replying to @Jocko29356643
Not sure what you mean. Literal cargo cults have existed, but they held incorrect beliefs.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 10h
Replying to @MeniRosenfeld
10/10 The only remedy to the original cargo cult was understanding how airplanes and radio actually work. The only remedy to blockchain cargo cult is understanding how, why and when blockchains work.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 10h
Replying to @MeniRosenfeld
9/10 And the scary thing is that this charade can go on for a while. They can continue having no product at all, or a product which isn't or shouldn't be decentralized, and they can just keep saying "oh and it's based on blockchain so it's much better", people will fall for it.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 10h
Replying to @MeniRosenfeld
8/10 So when they hear about this new way blockchain is being used to cure cancer and whatnot, they don't have the tools to call BS. And since the benefits of using a blockchain are not directly observable, these projects get away with not demonstrating superior performance.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 10h
Replying to @MeniRosenfeld
7/10 The problem is, most people *don't* understand how Bitcoin works. They know there's this thing called "blockchain" that somehow makes it decentralized, and they deduce that blockchain is some kind of general-purpose magic powder to make anything stronger, faster, cheaper.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 10h
Replying to @MeniRosenfeld
6/10 But these are things that might happen in *the future*. They're not things you can observe now. The only way to distinguish the two systems is to look at how they actually work. To be convinced of Bitcoin's merits, you need to know how it works, and why it is the way it is.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 10h
Replying to @MeniRosenfeld
5/10 It will allow receiving tokens and sending to anyone, easily and quickly, with little to no fees. Of course, it will be completely centralized, and with it will come the associated risks - The system might one day shut down, or start charging high fees or apply censorship.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 10h
Replying to @MeniRosenfeld
4/10 But the benefits of Bitcoin over traditional currencies isn't anything you can so easily measure. Even without using any of Bitcoin's innovation, I can create a system that, to the end user, will appear indistinguishable from Bitcoin - greatly outperform it, in fact.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 10h
Replying to @MeniRosenfeld
3/10 If I fail to make such a demonstration, everyone knows I'm BSing. If someone says they can build up on my design and use it to improve things which are completely unrelated to lightbulbs, he needs to demonstrate this, or he's BSing.
Reply Retweet Like
Meni Rosenfeld 10h
Replying to @MeniRosenfeld
2/10 If I invent a new, more efficient lightbulb, I can easily demonstrate that it A) gives off a certain luminance and B) draws less power than similarly-bright bulbs. Anyone can see this demo and be convinced it's the real deal, no knowledge of how my design works is required.
Reply Retweet Like