|
BluePrint
@
BluePrint_371
|
|
מפעיל הערוץ 'נושא לשיחה' בטלווישך: @Conversation_He
|
|
|
499
Tweets
|
11
Seguindo
|
7
Seguidores
|
| Tweets |
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
5 h |
|
אני בדרך כלל לא מהאנשים האומרים שחידוש של מותג ישן חוטא למקור, אבל התכנית נקראה The Storyteller, לא The Story Reader.
להסתכל למאזינים בעיניים זה חלק חשוב מהאווירה.
|
||
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
6 h |
|
ג'ון הרט לא הקריא מספר.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
10 h |
|
Just in case you may be oblivious, you should know that the feeling and the perception, are mutual.
(@Wolfpak561 my be an exception to the frustration)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
Then why do you refuse to be explicit in what you mean by it?
Are you afraid I would disagree with you?
If your above statement is correct (it isn't, even as hyperbole), it's your change to call me dishonest and for once be right about it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
No, you didn't write it explicitly. That is why I wrote "you operate as if".
And here you do it again:
I think different than you, I express that opinion, and you call me dishonest on nothing more than saying I think different than you.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
Can you list a couple of the assumptions the old earth conclusion is built on?
Just so I'll recognize them and know what I should reject?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
As you've yet to be specific about the word Assumption, I'm starting to be convinced you really don't know what's going on here.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
But you operate as if by Dishonest you mean "thinking different than me", and this impression is only reinforced when you refuse to engage any evidence brought to you for an old Earth.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
Yes. Claim.
Your "message" is: believe me, which is a claim. And a rather empty claim since you don't elaborate on what the message actually is.
You say educate yourself, but when people return with education, you call them dishonest.
Maybe you should reconsider your approach.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
See?
Again, you're claiming to know what I think.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
Here's that guy explaining that your claim is empty until you bring facts.
Or reference to facts.
Or allusion to facts.
Anything more than a strawman.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
It's actually really sad.
Every time anyone manages to bring you back to discussing the facts, you shift the goalpost, strawman them, and bring choice words from your Sailor's Dictionary of decorum.
And ironically, call them dishonest.
Are you factually impotant?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
Round and round we go:
twitter.com/BluePrint_371/…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
Then shut me up by bringing the points of data the scientists on "your side" have to counter the old earth ones.
It really is that simple.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
This seems to be very difficult for you to grasp, but I'll try again:
I can figure out what Assumption means. Easily.
What I can't figure out, is what YOU mean when YOU say Assumption.
Especially when every time I ask for clarification, you get exasperated because I asked.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
You keep insisting on this, but all you have to "support" this claim, is the claim that everyone is lying.
When what everyone who says billions of years have, is numerous points of data from nearly every field of science.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
Since you've yet to elaborate on what Assumption means in the context of science, and the only thing I can be sure of is it's not what I mean when I use the word in that context... I can't answer that question.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
Of course you didn't. You wouldn't say so even if you were aware of it, but it's the only conclusion I can reach from the way you converse here.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
Let's focus on Assumption, for now.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
BluePrint
@BluePrint_371
|
8 de jun |
|
A tautology is not an explanation.
And Mr.Atheist is someone else. I occasionally listen to him on YouTube.
Seems like a nice guy.
|
||
|
|
||