In Poland, an inescapable guilty conscience and an antisemitism that has never been combated prevent recognition of the Polish realities of the Shoah. This denial of responsibility, and the affabulations that accompany it, are perpetuated at state level and in the institutions in charge of remembrance policy. This week we publish “Denialism Polish style” by Elżbieta Janicka, a specialist in antisemitism and the Shoah, introduced by Jean-Charles Szurek. We discover the exemplary case of the Treblinka site, which, 80 years on, continues to make its money on the backs of the Jews. From the concealment of the sinister trade that took place at the station, to the invention of a false Righteous Man, the Catholicization of the victims and the attribution to the Germans of massacres of Jews committed by Poles, a whole series of narrative special effects are used to transform a shameful history into a source of national pride.
To feel ashamed implies to be exposed to public scrutiny: this is what Polish Holocaust deniers have understood, and they seek to avoid this painful experience by hiding their horrors under the carpet. But does this mean that pointing an accusing finger at others is enough to shame them? This is the strategy employed today by those who claim “Zionists, you should be ashamed”. But is there really anything to be ashamed of, when you know what Zionism means? This week, we publish a reflection by Ariel Colonomos on the way in which anti-Zionist activists seek to shame…
>>> Read more
Poland systematically denies any Polish responsibility for the extermination of the Jews. In this article, Elżbieta Janicka, a specialist in the Shoah and antisemitism, denounces the way in which, at Treblinka, this deceptive memorial policy multiplies historical fabrications.
In contemporary academic settings, shaming has become a powerful tool for shaping ethical debates, particularly on polarizing topics like Zionism and Israel. On many campuses, any form of support for Israel is deemed inherently shameful. This article examines the rise of “shaming” as a tactic in academia, questioning its legitimacy and exploring the ethical boundaries of such practices within universities. Ariel Colonomos reflects on how shame, far from fostering critical dialogue, risks undermining the core mission of academia: open debate and intellectual inquiry.
How do Israeli academics react to the call for a boycott of their universities, and to the idea that they support the policies of the Hebrew state? What is their relationship with the Netanyahu government, and how has the war affected their academic freedom? To shed light on these questions, K. went to interview them directly. We publish the answers of Professors Itaï Ater and Alon Korngreen, members of the “Academics for Israeli Democracy” group, as well as those of Professor Eyal Benvenisti, member of the “Forum of Israeli Law Professors for Democracy”.
Daniel Szeftel continues his investigation into the origins of the discourse that portrays Israel as an intrinsically genocidal entity. In this second part, he describes the post-war efforts of Arab nationalism to reformulate its discourse for Western audiences. This highlights a fundamental phenomenon in the accusations that characterize the discourse of settler colonialism: the concealment of racist and fascist elements at home and the projection of these onto the Jewish state.
Can Jewish religiosity blend with Zionism without ending up in messianism? Through this personal reading of Amnon Raz-Krakotzkin’s latest essay, Mishnaic Consciousness, Biblical Consciousness: Safed and Zionist Culture, Noémie Issan-Benchimol introduces us to another way of thinking about Jewish existence in the land of Israel: the Safed model, for which there is no outside of exile.
Is contemporary anti-Zionism a new version of “idiot socialism”? How can it be criticized from a left-wing perspective, without giving in to the sirens of reaction? In this interview, Mitchell Cohen, former editor-in-chief of Dissent magazine , gives us a few ways out of contemporary aporias. In the wake of the Trump victory, we also asked him to answer a few questions that might enlighten European readers about the American political situation.
What are the implications of the arrest warrants issued by the ICC against Netanyahu and Gallant? Should they be seen as a political judgment? To clarify the legal implications of this decision, K. went to interview legal expert Yann Jurovics – whom we had already interviewed about South Africa’s case before the International Court of Justice, as well as about the request to issue arrest warrants before the ICC last May.
What are the origins of the discourse that portrays Israel as an intrinsically genocidal entity, bent on the destruction of the indigenous Palestinian people? In the first part of his historical investigation, Daniel Szeftel examines the revival of Arab nationalism from the 20s to the 40s, highlighting the influence of fascism and European antisemitism on its structuring. The second part of his text will show how, from these ideological coordinates, the discourse of settler colonialism and the accusation of genocide against Israel developed in the second half of the twentieth century.
On a plane, two Jews are having a conversation. In this short story – delivered at the 2004 Koret Jewish Book Award ceremony in New York – Barbara Honigmann humorously questions what Jews have in common, and what radically sets them apart.
How can we explain the disarray of the European conscience in the face of the rise of antisemitism it promised itself it would “never again” tolerate? In this text, historians Henriette Asséo and Claudia Moatti examine the paradoxes of a Europe faced with the temptation of identity.
Dybbuk, golems, zombies, spectres, werewolves and other Mazzikim, Jewish demonology has penetrated the cinema, but what does it have to tell us? Between memories of the Shoah, reflections on evil, the body or the unconscious, or even the quest for an alternative religiosity – on the occasion of the exhibition currently on view at the mahJ in Paris: “The dybbuk. Phantom of the lost world”, an investigation into one of Judaism’s most singular contributions to art and representation. By David Haziza, who has just published ‘Jewish myths. The return of the sacred’, in the Diaspora book series published by Calmann-Lévy.
How did American Jews and their organizations position themselves during the presidential campaign, and what role did the Israel-Palestine conflict play in it? In this interview, conducted on the eve of Presidential Election Day, journalist and essayist Dara Horn sheds light on the political cleavages within the American Jewish world, and how they are at times instrumentalized.
Join us
With the support of:
Thanks to the Paris office of the Heinrich Böll Foundation for their cooperation in the design of the magazine’s website.