User talk:Charlesjsharp

possible future FP candidates

For anyone to nominate if they like the images

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		Because as I said when casting this !vote, the effort you made to take that picture has to be recognized somehow. Daniel Case (talk) 20:58, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Behavioural context

Hi, thanks for this amazing picture File:Pied_kingfisher_(Ceryle_rudis_rudis)_female_eating_chick.jpg! Would you know what the chick is of, the same species? might be of use in some animal behaviour related article if the context is clearly understood. Shyamal L. (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I don't know for sure @Shyamal:. There were no other species around yet about 300 pied kingfishers nesting in the same area, so I make that 90%+ sure. I've researched the net and cannot find any mention of cannibalism for kingfishers. I didn't capture any swallowing, so I thought it was possible the bird is playing with the chick, but my wife saw the bird being swallowed. I'd love to know more, as would our guide - it was new to him. Charles (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

License violation by Indian government

You might be interested in checking out this postage stamp! No words! Shyamal L. (talk) 15:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks @Shyamal:. Yes I was notified some weeks ago by a guy in India and have written to the Indian Postal Authorities, but no reply of course... I am visiting India in November - perhaps I will try again. Charles (talk) 19:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

If you are visiting southern India, I will be happy to take you to some good birding places. Shyamal L. (talk) 04:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Hope you had a good trip to India. I am guessing from your image stream that you did not get to southern India! PS: just saw the Black-hooded oriole picture, looking forward to seeing more of the southern specialities. Shyamal L. (talk) 02:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Kindness Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Archaeodontosaurus, Ikan Kekek, El Grafo, and Charles; you have all been very kind and helpful in showing how the VI and QI processes work (I'm nowhere near the FP level yet as you know) and giving me tips on taking better pictures. I know I have a lot to learn about photos. I do truly appreciate all your help. PumpkinSky talk 21:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you very much for the pictures taken from Brazil! Hume42 (talk) 19:16, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	The description on today's POTD gave me a good laugh. Thennicke (talk) 03:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Macedonian butterflies

Hi Charles, here are two more corrections : this one is Argynnis niobe (see the different arrangement of white marks and red background color on the hindwing), and that one is Satyrium acaciae (see for example the shape of the white postdiscal line near the inner margin). Were they also identified by your Bulgarian lepidopterist? Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 21:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, all were identified by him, but of course it will be me who has made the mistakes. I will be checking everything when he returns from holidays in ~ 10 days. It would be very nice if I had photographed Argynnis niobe as it was not on our species list for the tour. I do hope you know your stuff! Charles (talk)

I do, but these are identifications you should be able to convince yourself of. Don't solely rely on other people ;-)

Than you...

... for this. It has been very illustrative. Have a nice new year! DPC (talk) 12:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC) =

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Keep up the great work !!!!!!!!! Perumalism Chat 13:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Tiny grass blue (Zizula hylax) underside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Butterfly IDs

Hi Charles, I have seen that you reverted 3 of my corrections. I am afraid I have to insist: your "expert" is still wrong (I already gave arguments why, but I can again if you are interested), and if he insists about seeing adippe and pylaon on these pictures, then you should question his reliability as an identifier. I am sorry but we will have to re-revert... --LamBoet (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Go ahead. I haven't the energy for an edit war and cannot get him involved. Charles (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eagris denuba obliterata (Cream flat) dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pieris brassicoides brassicoides (Ethiopian cabbage white) underside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very well captured! But I thought the technical term was ventral. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
  * Comment No Ikan Kekek. Ventral is the correct term for the underside of an insect i.e. its body. Here we see the side of the body so underside of wings would be the perfect description, but underside is the term used by specialists. Ventral is perfect for mounted specimens. Charles (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
  Thanks for the explanation. In that case, I think I've seen a lot of photos incorrectly labeled, on QIC if not VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
  Yes, my early 'underside' VIs are labelled ventral! Charles (talk) 20:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Celaenorrhinus galenus (Orange sprite) dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Junonia sophia infracta (Little commodore) white form male, dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papilio nireus pseudonireus (Narrow-banded green swallowtail) underside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lycaena phlaeas pseudophlaeas (Small copper) underside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Junonia terea fumata (Soldier pansy) dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bicyclus anynana anynana (Squinting bush brown) underside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support as obviously best in scope, but I'm confused about the terminology. Why is this ventral and not just underside? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:35, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment No idea, probably because of the conversation we were doing at the time!! Charles (talk) 15:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Columba guinea guinea (Speckled pigeon).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - More useful because of the greater contrast. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Speckled pigeon (Columba guinea guinea).jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope)
2. Speckled pigeon (Columba guinea guinea) Ethiopia.jpg: +2 <--
=>
File:Speckled pigeon (Columba guinea guinea).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Speckled pigeon (Columba guinea guinea) Ethiopia.jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 17:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! African hawk eagle (Aquila spilogaster).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 15:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! African Grey Hornbill (Lophoceros nasutus epirhinus) female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 15:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolus auratus notatus (African golden oriole).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Voltmetro 19:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! African wattled lapwing (Vanellus senegallus lateralis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Kaizenify 13:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Black-shouldered kite (Elanus caeruleus caerulrus) young adult.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:37, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Bokmakierie (Telophorus zeylonus thermophilus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 13:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Coppery-tailed coucal (Centropus cupreicaudus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Dusky sunbird (Cinnyris fuscus) male 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Dusky sunbird (Cinnyris fuscus) male drinking.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquila spilogaster (African hawk eagle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support A great image! Voltmetro 10:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tockus nasutus epirhinus (African Grey Hornbill) female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Attention Scope and caption problem of synonymy --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)  Done sorted thanks. Charles (talk) 11:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope Voltmetro 10:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polyboroides typus typus (African harrier-hawk) taking off, showing wing upperside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good photo, fully depicts the scope. Voltmetro 10:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Black-crowned tchagra (Tchagra senegalus kalahari).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 08:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Large white (Pieris brassicae) underside.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Large white (Pieris brassicae) underside.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centropus cupreicaudus (Coppery-tailed coucal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Voltmetro 18:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cinnyris fuscus (Dusky sunbird) male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Voltmetro 18:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Beautiful demoiselle (Calopteryx virgo) male 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beautiful demoiselle (Calopteryx virgo) male 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Kori bustard (Ardeotis kori kori) female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Kori bustard (Ardeotis kori kori) male.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 14:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caprimulgus tristigma (Freckled nightjar) male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. Great camouflage! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caprimulgus tristigma (Freckled nightjar) female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Struthio camelus australis (Common ostrich) male running.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. Voltmetro 15:23, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:21, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phoeniculus purpureus angolensis (Green wood hoopoe) landing, showing underside of wings.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phoeniculus purpureus angolensis (Green wood hoopoe).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Long-tailed paradise-whydah (Vidua paradisaea) male.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Little bee-eater (Merops pusillus argutus) Namibia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Magpie shrike (Urolestes melanoleucus melanoleucus) Namibia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Lark-like bunting (Emberiza impetuani impetuani).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Lark-like bunting (Emberiza impetuani impetuani) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Common ostrich (Struthio camelus australis) male running composite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support - Good capture, considering that it's running. -- Ikan Kekek 06:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Helmeted guineafowl (Numida meleagris damarensis) head.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Quality photo of the bird's head. -- Ikan Kekek 06:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)