
Unsure whether to use Optimizely, VWO, Convert, Unbounce, Maxymiser, Google Optimize, SiteSpect, or an alternative platform for your split-testing?
Here’s the ultimate comparison of A/B testing software, multivariate testing tools and split-testing platforms.
Hover over the table headings to learn more.
| initial set-up cost | ongoing costs | technology compatibility |
a/b or mvt? |
type of mvt |
can it be self hosted |
can multiple goals be set ? |
can traffic be segmented ? |
used on email campaigns |
has a platform for creating webpages |
customer support by phone | self service or full service |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB Tasty |
Free Trial | From €40 | Client-side |
Both | Full factorial | Both | ||||||
Accenture Omni-Channel Testing Platform |
~$33,000 | $160,000- $320,000 |
Client-side |
Both | Several (see details) |
(see details) |
(see details) |
Both | ||||
![]() Adobe Target |
Contact Adobe | Usually a four-figure monthly fee | Server-side |
Both | Taguchi | (see details) |
Both | |||||
OpenText Optimost |
Contact OpenText Optimost | Usually a four-figure monthly fee | Client-side |
Both | Optimal design | Both | ||||||
ClickThroo |
None | $195-$1195 /month | Server-side |
A/B | N/A | Both | ||||||
Conductrics |
Contact Conductrics for details. | Monthly fee (Contact Conductrics for details.) |
Client and Server-side |
Both | Full factorial (see details) |
Contact Conductrics for details. | (see details) |
Self service | ||||
Convert |
None | From $499 per month | Client-side |
Both | Full and fractional factorial | Both | ||||||
CRE Engine |
Contact CRE | Contact CRE | Server-side |
A/B | N/A | Full service | ||||||
Webtrekk |
None | Usually a four-figure monthly fee | Client and Server-side |
Both | Full factorial (see details) |
(see details) |
(unlimited) |
Both | ||||
GetSmartContent |
None | From $500 per month | Client-side |
A/B | N/A | Both | ||||||
Google Optimize 360 |
None | None | Client-side |
A/B | N/A | (see details) |
Both (see details) |
|||||
HiConversion |
Contact HiConversion | Contact HiConversion | Client-side |
Both | Proprietary adaptive fractional factorial | Both | ||||||
Kameleoon |
None | Flat monthly fee (contact Kameleoon) | Client-side |
Both | Full factorial | Both | ||||||
Marketizator |
None | From $19/month (free for up to 10k visitors) | Client-side |
Both | Full factorial | Self service | ||||||
Oracle Maxymiser |
None | Usually a four-figure monthly fee | Client-side |
Both | Several (see details) |
Both | ||||||
Monetate |
Contact Monetate | Flat monthly fee based on previous 12 months’ traffic | Client-side |
Both | Several (see details) |
Both | ||||||
Optimizely |
Free | Flat monthly fee (contact Optimizely for details) | Client-side |
Both | Full factorial | Self service | ||||||
SiteSpect |
See details |
See details |
Proxy server method |
Both | Full and fractional factorial. | Both | ||||||
SiteTuners |
None | $1k-$2.5k per test | Client-side |
Both | Proprietary non -parametric technology |
(see details) |
Both | |||||
Unbounce |
Free | Free or $29-$999 /month, depending on traffic |
Server-side |
A/B | N/A | Self service | ||||||
VWO |
None | $49-$729 /month |
Client-side |
Both | Full factorial | Self service | ||||||
Webtrends |
Contact Webtrends | Usually a four-figure monthly fee | Client-side |
Both (see details) |
Several |
Both |
Still unsure which is the best A/B testing tool for you?
If you’re new to landing page optimization or conversion rate optimization, and would prefer an impartial review, contact us and we’ll tell you which platform we’d recommend for your situation. (We refuse to accept commissions from software vendors. When we recommend software, we do so because it’s best for your business, not ours.)
What you should do now
If you are serious about becoming great at conversion, you should download our amazingly useful free reports.
If you'd like us to dramatically improve your website, visit our "Services" page and then contact us for more information.
All of our articles are subject to our Testimonial Protocol, which is described here.
