≡ Menu

—–Original Message—–
From: A
Sent: Sat 7/8/2017 3:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Google antitrust case joke

Hello Walter: “Google suffered a major blow on Tuesday after European antitrust officials fined the search giant a record $2.7 billion for unfairly favoring some of its own services over those of rivals.” Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/technology/eu-google-fine.html?mcubz=0 Have you thought out any reductio ad absurdums or plain jokes, perhaps involving sports or entertainment figures which can show the absurdity of these rulings? My best regards, A

Dear Arnie: How about this:

The anti trust authorities should fine team sports members (soccer, basketball, football) for passing the ball to their own team members rather than competitors. They should for a portion of the time (that portion to be determined by economists, using econometrics, in a full employment initiative for dismal scientists and statisticians) pass the ball to members of the competing team. After all, that would only be fair. Passing to one’s own team members is an unfair use of monopoly power (when it is in their possession, they are “monopolizing” the ball). Let’s take a look at the statistics. The leaders in the NBA for assists, and in the NFL for passes completed, should be fined. That’ll teach ‘em to favor their own team-mates over their competitors. Hey, fair is fair. Obama missed a bet when he didn’t appoint me to head up the anti trust division of the so-called department of justice.

Best regards,

Walter

Walter E. Block, Ph.D.
Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair and Professor of Economics
Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business
Loyola University New Orleans
6363 St. Charles Avenue, Box 15, Miller Hall 318
New Orleans, LA 70118
tel: (504) 864-7934
fac: (504)864-7970
[email protected]
http://www.walterblock.com/

Walter Block Publications

Skype: Walter.Block4

If it moves, privatize it; if it doesn’t move, privatize it. Since everything either moves or doesn’t move, privatize everything.

“It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.” Murray, N. Rothbard

“Everyone carries a part of society on his shoulders; no one is relieved of his share of responsibility by others. And no one can find a safe way out for himself if society is sweeping toward destruction. Therefore, everyone, in his own interests, must thrust himself vigorously into the intellectual battle. None can stand aside with unconcern; the interest of everyone hangs on the result. Whether he chooses or not, every man is drawn into the great historical struggle, the decisive battle into which our epoch has plunged us.” Ludwig von Mises

Top Ten Contemporary Academics Helping The Political Right (#8)
http://www.poletical.com/academics-helping-the-right.php

100 Most Influential Libertarians: A Newsmax/FreedomFest List (#46)
http://www.newsmax.com/BestLists/libertarians-newsmax-freedomfest/2017/06/01/id/793510/

Share

4:10 pm on July 8, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }

Kenneth Rogoff, with his book, The Curse of Cash, is one of the most outspoken critics of cash. He wants to immediately prohibit use of large bills ($100, $50) and eventually even smaller ones ($20, $10). Graciously, he will leave us with the smallest ones ($1, $5). For very different reasons than he puts forth, I agree with his contention. I, too, oppose the use of U.S. fiat currency. Had Ron Paul become president of our country, and had he appointed me to be in charge of this sort of thing, I would have implements the Rogoff plan, only I would have been more through: not only $1 and $5 bills would have to go, but the same would apply to quarters, dimes, nickels and pennies. (I now renounce this essay of mine: Block, Walter E. 8/26/01. “Keep the penny; ditch the Fed,” New Orleans Times Picayune, p. B-7; reprinted in http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block7.html, 8/29/01; “Freedom News Daily” [email protected], 8/30/01; http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2016/04/the-penny-and-fed.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+economicpolicyjournal%2FKpwH+%28EconomicPolicyJournal.com%29).

How can I justify making common cause with Prof. Rogoff, an interventionist if ever there was one (bless his heart, as we say in the South; not to bring in an irrelevancy, but they can take away our statue of Robert E. Lee, however, not that saying, at least not yet)? I do so because I oppose U.S. fiat currency, just as he does, which is what we are now talking about, which it what this Harvard professor is advocating doing away with (partially on his part, completely on mine). Where I part company from the good (money) socialist professor lies in what we would substitute for present money. He would go to electronic money, not bitcoin, of course. I, in sharp contrast, favor the gold standard. Let us, then, by all means, get rid of all government connection with money, from the penny to the largest denomination, and substitute for it gold as money!

Share

2:31 pm on July 8, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }

Is An Cap Vulnerable to Warlords, Crony Capitalists, Or Corporativists?

—–Original Message—–
From: C
Sent: Sat 7/8/2017 3:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Question about Cartels

Hello Professor Block, My name is C, I am 20 years old and I live near Seattle. I used to be a socialist, and though I now know socialism has never succeeded, requires a state to function, and markets produce more liberty and freedom of thought, there is one argument made by more clever anarcho-statists which I have never heard addressed. I am unable to find fault with it logically, and it has been gnawing on me for a while. Perhaps I have missed something obvious, but since you are the most consistent Anarcho-capitalist, and have published over 500 papers, I was hoping you could point me to any detailed responses to this argument. The argument goes roughly as follows: Corporations who collaborate with the state against the market, will violate the NAP whether the state exists or not. Of course they cannot wield the power of the democratic state to lobby for subsidies and favorable regulations, which is good. But with freedom of association they can form cartels, and with the absence of a police force, they will not voluntarily submit to any investigation which might uncover a conspiracy to violently seize the property of a defenseless curmudgeon, or violently oust competing businesses. Without libel laws, they can spread convincing fake news about any potential muckraker, if they don’t resort to assassinating him. Put simply, though we have excessive regulations now, without any at all, the most successful businesses form corporate cartels which are functionally no different from states with regards to self-ownership and private property rights. In other words capitalism vs. corporatism is a false dichotomy. What have I missed? Thanks, From C

Dear C:

What’s “gnawing” at you is the classical question of whether anarcho capitalism is stable. If we ever had such a system, would it survive, or, would it be vulnerable to corporatists? I think an cap would survive, although crony capitalists are always a danger. One bit of evidence for my contention: an cap has existed for 10s of thousands of years on the global scale. Canada and Chile are in a state of anarchism vis a vis each other; there’s no world government. Ditto for ALL other nations. For the libertarian view on libel laws, see below. I’m also sending you a large reading list on an cap. I think the essay that most closely answers your question, challenge, is the one by Bob Murphy on Warlords taking over.

Also, on an entirely different matter, please read this and get back to me on it:

Block, Walter E. 2017. “C’mon Down To New Orleans; The Water’s Fine. Enroll at Loyola University.” June 27; https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/cmon-new-orleans-waters-fine-enroll-loyola-university/

On libel:

Block 1976, ch. 7, 2008; Rothbard, 1998, ch. 16

Block, Walter E. 2008 [1976]. Defending the Undefendable. Auburn, AL: The Mises Institute;

Block, Walter. 2008. “Sue for libel?” December 29; http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block124.html

Rothbard, Murray N. 1998 [1982]. The Ethics of Liberty, New York: New York University Press. http://www.mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp

On an cap:

Anderson and Hill, 1979; Benson, 1989, 1990; Block, 2007, 2010, 2011; Casey, 2010; DiLorenzo, 2010; Gregory, 2011; Guillory & Tinsley, 2009; Hasnas, 1995; Heinrich, 2010; Higgs, 2009, 2012, 2017; Hoppe, 2008, 2011; Huebert, 2010; King, 2010; Kinsella, 2009; Long, 2004; McConkey, 2013; Molyneux, 2008; Murphy, 2005; Oppenheimer, 1926; Paul, 2008; Rockwell, 2013, 2016; Rothbard, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1998; Spooner, 1870; Stringham, 2007, 2015; Tannehill, 1984; Tinsley, 1998-1999; Wenzel, 2013; Woods, 2014.

Anderson, Terry and Hill, P.J. 1979. “An American Experiment in Anarcho-Capitalism: The Not So Wild, Wild West,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, 3: 9-29; http://mises.org/journals/jls/3_1/3_1_2.pdf

Benson, Bruce L. 1989. Enforcement of Private Property Rights in Primitive Societies: Law Without Government,” The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. IX, No. 1, Winter, pp. 1-26; http://mises.org/journals/jls/9_1/9_1_1.pdf

Benson, Bruce L. 1990. “Customary Law with Private Means of Resolving Disputes and Dispensing Justice: A Description of a Modern System of Law and Order without State Coercion.” The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. IX, No. 2,” pp. 25-42; http://mises.org/journals/jls/9_2/9_2_2.pdf

Block, Walter. 2007. “Anarchism and Minarchism; No Rapprochement Possible: Reply to Tibor Machan,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1, Spring, pp. 91-99; http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/21_1/21_1_5.pdf

Block, Walter E. 2011. “Governmental inevitability: reply to Holcombe.” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 22; pp. 667-688; http://mises.org/journals/jls/22_1/22_1_34.pdf

Block, Walter E. and Michael Fleischer. 2010. “How Would An Anarchist Society Handle Child Abuse?” October 13; http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block167.html
Casey, Doug. 2010. “Doug Casey on Anarchy.” March 31; http://www.caseyresearch.com/cwc/doug-casey-anarchy
DiLorenzo, Thomas J. 2010. “The Culture of Violence in the American West: Myth versus Reality.” The Independent Review, v. 15, n. 2, Fall 2010, pp. 227–239; http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_15_02_4_dilorenzo.pdf

Gregory, Anthony. 2011. “Abolish the Police.” May 26; http://www.lewrockwell.com/gregory/gregory213.html

Guillory, Gil & Patrick Tinsley. 2009. “The Role of Subscription-Based Patrol and Restitution in the Future of Liberty,” Libertarian Papers 1, 12; http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/12-the-role-of-subscription-based-patrol-and-restitution-in-the-future-of-liberty/
Hasnas, John. 1995. “The myth of the rule of law.” Wisconsin Law Review 199;
http://faculty.msb.edu/hasnasj/GTWebSite/MythWeb.htm

Heinrich, David J. 2010. “Justice for All Without the State.” The Libertarian Standard. May 6; http://www.libertarianstandard.com/articles/david-j-heinrich/justice-for-all-without-the-state/

Higgs, Robert. 2009. “Why We Couldn’t Abolish Slavery Then and Can’t Abolish Government Now.” August 20; http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs128.html

Higgs, Robert. 2012. “What is the point of my libertarian anarchism?” January 16;
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs180.html

Higgs, Robert. 2017. “Is a National Government Necessary for National Defense?” March 23; http://www.targetliberty.com/2017/03/is-national-government-necessary-for.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TargetLiberty+%28Target+Liberty%29

Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 2008. “Reflections on the Origin and the Stability of the State.” June 23; http://www.lewrockwell.com/hoppe/hoppe18.html

Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 2011. “State or Private Law Society.” April 10;
http://www.lewrockwell.com/hoppe/hoppe26.1.html

Huebert, Jacob. 2010. Libertarianism Today. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger

King, Seth. 2010. “Daily Anarchist Interviews Walter E. Block,” September 9;
http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block165.html

Kinsella, Stephan. 2009. “The Irrelevance of the Impossibility of Anarcho-Libertarianism.” August 20; http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/08/20/the-irrelevance-of-the-impossibility-of-anarcho-libertarianism/

Long, Roderick. 2004. “Libertarian Anarchism: Responses to Ten Objections” http://www.lewrockwell.com/long/long11.html

McConkey, Michael. 2013. “Anarchy, Sovereignty, and the State of Exception: Schmitt’s Challenge.” The Independent Review, v. 17, n. 3, Winter, pp. 415–428. http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_17_03_05_mcconkey.pdf

Molyneux, Stefan. 2008. “The Stateless Society: An Examination of Alternatives.”
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02056.html

Murphy, Robert P. 2005. “But Wouldn’t Warlords Take Over?” July 7; http://mises.org/story/1855; http://mises.org/library/wouldnt-warlords-take-over

Oppenheimer, Franz. 1926. The State. New York: Vanguard Press

Paul, Ron. 2008. “On the Inner Contradictions of Limited Government.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o4kiWpqoeg&feature=PlayList&p=9645F6A68683F679&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=4

Rockwell, Lew. 2013. “What Would We Do Without the State?” March 31;
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/134782.html

What Would We Do Without the State?

Rockwell, Lew. 2016. “The Trouble With Politics.” November 8;

The Fatal Flaw in Politics

Rothbard, Murray N. 1973. For a New Liberty, Macmillan, New York; http://mises.org/rothbard/newlibertywhole.asp

In the view of Rothbard (1973, emphasis added by present author): “For centuries, the State (or more strictly, individuals acting in their roles as ‘members of the government’) has cloaked its criminal activity in high-sounding rhetoric. For centuries the State has committed mass murder and called it ‘war’; then ennobled the mass slaughter that ‘war’ involves. For centuries the State has enslaved people into its armed battalions and called it ‘conscription’ in the ‘national service.’ For centuries the State has robbed people at bayonet point and called it ‘taxation.’ In fact, if you wish to know how libertarians regard the State and any of its acts, simply think of the State as a criminal band, and all of the libertarian attitudes will logically fall into place.”

Rothbard, Murray N. 1975. “Society Without a State.” The Libertarian Forum, volume 7.1, January; http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard133.html

Rothbard, Murray N. 1977. “Do you hate the state?” The Libertarian Forum, Vol. 10, No. 7, July; http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard75.html
“…there is no sign that David Friedman in any sense hates the existing American State or the State per se, hates it deep in his belly as a predatory gang of robbers, enslavers, and murderers. No, there is simply the cool conviction that anarchism would be the best of all possible worlds, but that our current set-up is pretty far up with it in desirability. For there is no sense in Friedman that the State – any State – is a predatory gang of criminals.”
“The radical cannot think in such terms, because the radical regards the State as our mortal enemy, which must be hacked away at wherever and whenever we can. To the radical libertarian, we must take any and every opportunity to chop away at the State, whether it’s to reduce or abolish a tax, a budget appropriation, or a regulatory power. And the radical libertarian is insatiable in this appetite until the State has been abolished, or – for minarchists – dwindled down to a tiny, laissez-faire role.”
Rothbard, Murray N. 1998 [1982]. The Ethics of Liberty, New York: New York University Press. http://www.mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp

Paul, Ron. 2008. “On the Inner Contradictions of Limited Government.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o4kiWpqoeg&feature=PlayList&p=9645F6A68683F679&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=4

Shaffer, Butler.
www.mises.org/books/wizards/pdf

Spooner, Lysander. 1966[1870]. No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority and A Letter to Thomas F. Bayard, Larkspur, Colorado: Rampart College; http://jim.com/treason.htm

Stringham, Edward, ed. 2007. Anarchy and the Law: The Political Economy of Choice, Somerset, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Stringham, Edward. 2015. Private Governance: Creating Order in Economic and Social Life. Oxford University Press

Tannehill, Morris and Linda Tannehill. [1970] 1984. The Market for Liberty, New York: Laissez Faire Books; http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/tannehill1.html

Tinsley, Patrick. 1998-1999. “With Liberty and Justice for All: A Case for Private Police,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, Winter, pp. 95-100; http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/14_1/14_1_5.pdf

Wenzel, Robert. 2013. “Robert Ringer’s Strawman Anarchist.” February 2;
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/wenzel/wenzel211.html

Woods, Tom. 2014. “Four things the state is not.” July 29;

4 Things the State Is Not

private police: private army:

Gregory, 2011; Guillory, & Tinsley. 2009; Hoppe, 2011; Huebert, 2010; Murphy, 2005; Rothbard, 1973, 1975, 1998 [1982]; Stringham, 2007; Tannehills[1970] 1984; Tinsley, 1998-1999; Wiśniewski, 2014; Wollstein, 1969; Woolridge, 1970.

Gregory, Anthony. 2011. “Abolish the Police.” May 26; http://www.lewrockwell.com/gregory/gregory213.html

Guillory, Gil & Patrick Tinsley. 2009. “The Role of Subscription-Based Patrol and Restitution in the Future of Liberty,” Libertarian Papers 1, 12; http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/12-the-role-of-subscription-based-patrol-and-restitution-in-the-future-of-liberty/
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 2011. “State or Private Law Society.” April 10;
http://www.lewrockwell.com/hoppe/hoppe26.1.html

Huebert, Jacob. 2010. Libertarianism Today. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger

Murphy, Robert P. 2005. “But Wouldn’t Warlords Take Over?” July 7; http://mises.org/story/1855; http://mises.org/library/wouldnt-warlords-take-over

Rothbard, Murray N. 1973. For a New Liberty, Macmillan, New York; http://mises.org/rothbard/newlibertywhole.asp

Rothbard, Murray N. 1975. “Society Without a State.” The Libertarian Forum, volume 7.1, January; http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard133.html

Rothbard, Murray N. 1998 [1982]. The Ethics of Liberty, New York: New York University Press. http://www.mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp

Stringham, Edward, ed. 2007. Anarchy and the Law: The Political Economy of Choice, Somerset, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Tannehill, Morris and Linda Tannehill. [1970] 1984. The Market for Liberty, New York: Laissez Faire Books; http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/tannehill1.html

Tinsley, Patrick. 1998-1999. “With Liberty and Justice for All: A Case for Private Police,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, Winter, pp. 95-100; http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/14_1/14_1_5.pdf

Wiśniewski, Jakub Bożydar. 2014. “Defense as a private good in a competitive order” Review of Social and Economic Issues, Vol. 1, No. 1, Summer, pp. 2-35;
http://rsei.rau.ro/images/V1N1/Jakub%20Bozydar%20Wisniewski.pdf

Wollstein, Jarret B. 1969. Society Without Coercion. In Society Without Government. New York: Arno Press

Woolridge, William C. 1970. Uncle Sam the Monopoly Man, New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arlington House

Best regards,

Walter

Walter E. Block, Ph.D.
Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair and Professor of Economics
Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business
Loyola University New Orleans
6363 St. Charles Avenue, Box 15, Miller Hall 318
New Orleans, LA 70118
tel: (504) 864-7934
fac: (504)864-7970
[email protected]
http://www.walterblock.com/

Walter Block Publications

Skype: Walter.Block4

If it moves, privatize it; if it doesn’t move, privatize it. Since everything either moves or doesn’t move, privatize everything.

“It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.” Murray, N. Rothbard

“Everyone carries a part of society on his shoulders; no one is relieved of his share of responsibility by others. And no one can find a safe way out for himself if society is sweeping toward destruction. Therefore, everyone, in his own interests, must thrust himself vigorously into the intellectual battle. None can stand aside with unconcern; the interest of everyone hangs on the result. Whether he chooses or not, every man is drawn into the great historical struggle, the decisive battle into which our epoch has plunged us.” Ludwig von Mises

Top Ten Contemporary Academics Helping The Political Right (#8)
http://www.poletical.com/academics-helping-the-right.php

100 Most Influential Libertarians: A Newsmax/FreedomFest List (#46)
http://www.newsmax.com/BestLists/libertarians-newsmax-freedomfest/2017/06/01/id/793510/

Share

11:37 am on July 8, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }

From: B
Sent: Wed 7/5/2017 11:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Learning Praxeology, Austrian Economics

Greetings Mr. Block, My name is B, a 26-years-old from Morocco. After failing couple of small businesses I realized how complex the world is, stopped everything, went back to my room and tried to learn how choices, people, economics, works, I felt lost and nothing made sens to me till I’ve discovered the Austrian School of economics. Learning and reading about economics the Austrian way changed m life forever, it changed the way I deal with people, the way I live, the way I see things, the way I explain the world. I felt an extraordinary enlightenment, and knew that I will never be the same again. Getting deep into Human Action and Praxeology led me to my first conversion, from Socialism to Libertarianism, and then, I had my second conversion from Libertarianism to Anarcho-Capitalism, and it feels just AMAZING. Now I wanna learn more about Austrian Economics “the radical way” and I consider you maybe the best Economist alive, I feel that Austrian Economics could not just explain things better, further more, it could really change completely the way we master economics, and to be honest, I have no interest at all in main stream economics, I feel that main stream economics is just bullshit, even if I have a technological training and I was trained to become a “positivist”, and I have a deep belief that Austrian Economics and especially Praxeology could be the science of the future, Artificial Intelligence is eating the economy and only a clear precise understanding of the Humain Action could be help entrepreneurs, economists and philosophers. I’m emailing you to ask you if there is any way to learn from you, by joining your university or attempting any program you’re animating, I really wanna learn from you personally. Thank you for your amazing talks, and thank you for reading my email. B

Dear B:

Thanks for your kind words. What academic degrees do you already have? High school graduation? College degree?

Best regards,

Walter

—–Original Message—–
From: B
Sent: Wed 7/5/2017 11:30 AM
To: Walter Block
Subject: Re: Learning Praxeology, Austrian Economics

1000 Thanks Mr. Block for answering my email.

I have something like an Associate’s degree in general engineering, I don’t know exactly how the academic system works in the U.S. but it’s technically 2 successful years after High School, we follow the French academic system here in Morocco.

But trust me Mr. Block I’ve watched thousands of hours of Mises Institute’s video and read almost all the popular works of Rothbard, Mises, some of yours because I couldn’t buy them all, read almost all of the free e-books out there about Austrian Economics from Menger’s to Hoppe’s and Murphy’s, and I have no problem starting from the beginning.

Thank you again Mr. Block, I still can’t believe you answered me. B

Dear B:

Enroll at Loyola U and take courses with me and my free enterprise colleagues:

Block, Walter E. 2017. “C’mon Down To New Orleans; The Water’s Fine. Enroll at Loyola University.” June 27;

C’mon Down To New Orleans; The Water’s Fine. Enroll at Loyola University

If you’ve passed deadlines for admission, I’ll try to help you overcome them.

Best regards,

Walter

Walter E. Block, Ph.D.
Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair and Professor of Economics
Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business
Loyola University New Orleans
6363 St. Charles Avenue, Box 15, Miller Hall 318
New Orleans, LA 70118
tel: (504) 864-7934
fac: (504)864-7970
[email protected]
http://www.walterblock.com/ <http://www.walterblock.com/
http://www.walterblock.com/publications/ <http://www.walterblock.com/publications/
Skype: Walter.Block4

If it moves, privatize it; if it doesn’t move, privatize it. Since everything either moves or doesn’t move, privatize everything.

“It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.” Murray, N. Rothbard

“Everyone carries a part of society on his shoulders; no one is relieved of his share of responsibility by others. And no one can find a safe way out for himself if society is sweeping toward destruction. Therefore, everyone, in his own interests, must thrust himself vigorously into the intellectual battle. None can stand aside with unconcern; the interest of everyone hangs on the result. Whether he chooses or not, every man is drawn into the great historical struggle, the decisive battle into which our epoch has plunged us.” Ludwig von Mises

Top Ten Contemporary Academics Helping The Political Right (#8)
http://www.poletical.com/academics-helping-the-right.php <http://www.poletical.com/academics-helping-the-right.php

100 Most Influential Libertarians: A Newsmax/FreedomFest List (#46)
http://www.newsmax.com/BestLists/libertarians-newsmax-freedomfest/2017/06/01/id/793510/ <http://www.newsmax.com/BestLists/libertarians-newsmax-freedomfest/2017/06/01/id/793510/

Share

1:08 pm on July 5, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }

I’ve Just Become A Neo-Conservative; Well, At Least Partially

Email Print

Share

One of the foundational concepts of neo-conservativism is American Exceptionalism. Well, I’m an American Exceptionalist, so I’m well on my way to being a neo-conservative. Let me list the ways in which the U.S. is an exceptional country.

.It is the only one to have used atom bombs on a population center. Twice, as it happens.
.It is the only one to have, oh, some 800 military bases in about 130 foreign countries.
.It is the most hypocritical country, in that it popularly thinks the point above constitutes “defense”
.Most people in this nation cannot distinguish “offense” from “defense.” You’ve got to admit it; that’s pretty rare
.It’s military budget is bigger than that of such spending by, oh, the next ten largest nations in this regard
.In 1995, it was the 4th freest country, economically. It has sunk to almost 20th. No other nation can match that.
.It congratulates itself that it is the “home of the free and the brave.” Yet it picks on weak, tiny countries to overrun.

Happy Fourth of July, everyone.

Hey, waitasec. Now that I’m a Neo-Con, well, sort of, can someone please tell me to whom I should apply for generous financial support for my career?

Share

11:54 am on July 4, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }

Our president, the only president of the U.S. at present, my president, your president, everyone’s president (at least in our country) has been under fire from the usual suspects for excessive tweeting. In their view, it is unbecoming of a president of the U.S. to tweet at all, let alone so much. And, also, he hits below the belt: when you get into a mud fight, even if you “win,” you still get dirty. This is the feedback from his so called friends. What is forthcoming from his enemies usually features the four letter “F” word, and it is not “fair” or “free.”

His real supporters have entirely a different view. It is that he is a “fighter” and when he gets hit, he strikes back. And, he usually gives “better” than he receives. This reminds me of comedian Chevy Chase’s continual portrayal of President Gerald Ford as an inept (physical) blunderer, always tripping over his own feet. And yet this target played football at a Big Ten University, and you don’t get to do anything of the sort if you are not a good athlete. I wonder what would have happened had Ford challenged Chase to a sort of decathlon: bowling, shooting free throws, running a quarter mile, swimming 100 yards, a tennis game, etc. I’ll bet Ford, who spotted Chase a decade or two, would have won, and put the latter in his place. Trump’s counter tweeting is seen by his real supporters in this vein.

What is the libertarian take on this matter?

It is pretty positive I claim. One element is that the exalted nature of that office might be taken down a peg or two. Nothing that reduces the prestige of that office can be all bad from the libertarian point of view. Another benefit can best be seen by extrapolation: suppose the Donald did nothing but tweet; would this be good for liberty or not? While Trump has done some good things, or at least bodes well to do so (regulation reduction, tax decreases, his Supreme Court nomination), most of what he has accomplished so far must be placed on the debit side of the ledger: protectionism, and especially bombing countries the U.S. has no business of even occupying in the first place. So, Mr. President, let those tweets rip. The more of them the better. And, while you’re at it, Donald, why not get your cabinet to tweet as well? If you all tweeted, oh, 8-10 hours per day, and left the rest of us strictly alone, that would go on the credit side of the ledger. (Similarly, when Obama went on vacation, or played basketball, liberty got a boost; and, thank God for golf, when Eisenhower was in the oval office).

Share

2:47 pm on July 3, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }

There has been a lot of fuss, in libertarian and conservative circles, about Nancy MacLean’s new book Democracy in Chains. I have not yet read it, but, based on this plethora of reviews it has so far garnered, I discern that one of its main “insights” is that James Buchanan in particular, and his (and Gordon Tullock’s!) Public Choice School in general, are leaders of the libertarian movement; among its very founders. Nothing could be further from the truth, as this book amply demonstrates:

DiLorenzo, Thomas J. and Walter E. Block. 2016. An Austro-Libertarian Critique of Public Choice; Addleton Academic Publishers; www.addletonacademicpublishers.com; 30-18 50th Street, Woodside, New York, 11377; [email protected]; ISBN 978-1-942585-26-8, eISBN 978-1-942585-27-5

Instead, Tom and I criticize both Buchanan and Public Choice on Austrian and libertarian grounds. Virtually all the chapters were written by my co author and me. I don’t know if Tom agrees with me on this or not, but, I regard the single chapter in that book not written by either of us as the best one in it. It is this, which we reprinted in this book of ours:

Rothbard, Murray. 1997. “Buchanan and Tullock’s ‘The Calculus of Consent,” The Logic of Action II, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 269-274

I know this is shameless self-promotion, but, if you want a compelling antidote to the view that Buchanan was a leading libertarian, read this book.

As it happens, I am a fan of Democracy in Chains. I have to concede, she does spell the word “libertarian” correctly (at least based on the reviews of it I have seen). She doesn’t spell it “libertoonian,” nor confuse us with librarians nor libertines (none the reviews of it I have seen make this claim). In my view, there is no such thing as bad publicity. Any focus on our beloved philosophy is a good thing. So, thank you, Miss (sic) MacLean.

Share

12:35 pm on June 30, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }

My Upcoming Speeches, Lectures, Debates

Email Print

Share

July 16, 2017. Vancouver, BC, Canada. Walter Block debates Tim Moen, Leader of the Canadian Libertarian Party. https://www.facebook.com/events/1800169280300222/
436 W Pender Street, downtown Vancouver at 2:30pm. Topic: Is spanking children compatible with libertarianism? Contact: Victor Pross: [email protected]; or go here:
https://www.facebook.com/events/1800169280300222/1831218550528628/?acontext=%7B%22ref%22%3A%2229%22%2C%22ref_notif_type%22%3A%22admin_plan_mall_activity%22%2C%22action_history%22%3A%22null%22%7D&notif_t=admin_plan_mall_activity&notif_id=1498028247599964. Open to the public.

July 23-29, 2017. Auburn, AL. Mises University; https://mises.org/events/mises-university-2017

September, 2017. Walter E. Block debates Mike Munger. At Duke University. More information TBA.

On October 5, 2017 I will be delivering the Sebastian J. Raciti Memorial Lecture, named after one of the longest serving business school deans and one of the business school founders at Ramapo College. This lecture will take place at 505 Ramapo Valley Road, Mahwah, New Jersey. For further information, and to RSVP, contact Prof. Murray Sabrin: [email protected] (201-684-7373). The title of my lecture: “The Next Business Frontier: Privatizing the Rivers, Oceans and Space.” The event will take place at the Trustees Pavilion at 7pm, which is located across the street from the Anisfield School of Business and about 150 feet away from that building. Open to the public.

October 6-7, 2017. New York City. Mises Institute’s 35th anniversary at the New York Hilton Midtown. https://mises.org/events/35th-anniversary-new-york-city

My Speeches for 2017. Come Join Me If You’re In Town

Share

3:35 pm on June 28, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }

Health Economics Bibliography:

A few days ago, someone asked me for a reading list of material from an Austro-libertarian point of view, on health economics. I placed that on this blog:

Libertarian Views on Health Care

I asked for additions, and several people sent me more material. Thanks to them, I can now offer a greatly expanded bibliography.

Let me just say that this listing is highly relevant, given the attempts of the Republicans to repeal Obamacare. What would a truly free enterprise health care industry look like? This bibliography furnishes some answers to that question. See on this below.

A while ago I sent you an article of me attacking Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz for donating a kidney to an orphan while calling those who traffic organs on the black market “shameful”, and generally being against a free market in organs.
Amazingly, and to my complete and utter surprise, Yanklowitz has just reversed his position.
Here is my original piece attacking him: http://thejewishlibertarian.com/2015/06/22/on-organ-donation-organ-sales-and-hypocrisy/
Here is his original piece attacking organ trafficking: http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/the-shame-of-orthodoxy-1.281148
Here is his new piece now supporting a (regulated) market in human organs.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/02/donated-kidneys-paying-black-market-organs

Here is my public apology, which I said I would pen if Yanklowitz ever reversed his position, which he has.

Shmuly Yanklowitz Supports Human Organ Sales!

http://www.oudaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/12/09/43990bba5cb68

Adams, A. F., A. H. Barnett, and D. L. Kaserman. 1999. Markets of Organs: “The Question of Supply.” Contemporary Economics Policy. 17 (April): 147-155; Anderson, W. L., and A. H. Barnett. 1999. “Waiting for Transplants.” The Free Market 17 (4): 1-2; Barnett, A. H., T. R. Beard, and D. L. Kaserman. 1993. “The Medical Community’s Opposition to Organ Markets: Ethics or Economics?” Review of Industrial Organization. 8: 669-678; Barnett, A. H., R. D. Blair, and D. L. Kaserman. 1992. “Improving Organ Donations: Compensation Versus Markets.” Inquiry. 29 (Fall): 372-378; Barnett, A. H., and D. L. Kaserman. 1995. “The ‘Rush to Transplant’ and Organ Shortages.” Economic Inquiry. 33 (July): 506-515; Barnett, W. II, 1988. “The Market in Used Human Body Parts.” The Free Market. 6 (11): 5; Barnett, W. II, M. Saliba, and D. Walker. 2001. “ A Free Market in Kidneys: Efficient and Equitable.” The Independent Review. 5 (3): 373-385; Barney Jr., D., and L. Reynolds. 1989. “An Economic analysis of Transplant Organs.” Atlantic Economic Journal. 17 (September): 12-20; Blair, R. D., and D. L. Kaserman. 1991. “The Economics and Ethics of Alternative Cadaveric Organ Procurement Policies.” Yale Journal on Regulation. 8: 403-452; Block, Walter E. 1988. The Case for a Free Market in Body Parts. The Free Market 6 (3): 3; Block, Walter E., Roy Whitehead, Clint Johnson, Mana Davidson, Alan White and Stacy Chandler, “Human Organ Transplantation: Economic and Legal Issues,” Quinnipiac College School of Law Health Journal, Vol. 3, 1999-2000, pp. 87-110; Caplan, A. L. 1992. If I Were a Rich Man Could I Buy a Pancreas? And Other Essays on the Ethics of Health Care. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press; Carlstrom, C. T., and C. D. Rollow. 1997. “The Rationing of Transplantable Organs: A Troubled Lineup.” Cato Journal. 17 (Fall): 163-177; DeJong, W., J. Drachman,, S. L. Gortmaker, et al. 1995. “Options for Increasing Organ Donations: The Potential Role for Financial Incentives, Standardized Hospital Procedures, and Public Education to Promote Family Discussion.” The Milbank Quarterly 73 (3): 463-479; Hansmann, H. 1989. “The Economics and Ethics of Markets for Human Organs.” Journal of Health, Politics, and Policy and Law. (Spring): 57-85; Kaserman, D. L., and A. H. Barnett. 1991. “An Economic Analysis of Transplant Organs: A Comment and Extension.” Atlantic Economic Journal. 19 (June): 57-63; Prince, Dennis. 1999. “Organ for Sale—Not Wurlitzer.” http://www.auctionwatch.com/awdaily/dailynews/1-090399.html; Richards, J. R. 1996. “Nephrarious Goings On: Kidney Sales and Moral Arguments.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 21 (4) August: 375-416; Rottenberg, S. 1971. “The Production and Exchange of Used Body Parts.” Towards Liberty. 2: 322-333; Schwindt, R., and A. R. Vining. 1986. “Proposal for a Future Delivery Market for Transplant Organs.” Journal of Health Policy and Law. 11 (Fall): 483-500; Vining, A. R., and R. Schwindt. 1988. “Have a Heart: Increasing the Supply of Transplant Organs for Infants and Children.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 7 (4) 706-710; Williams, Walter. 2013. “Unnecessarty Tragedy.” June 11; http://www.lewrockwell.com/williams-w/w-williams172.html

Transplant:: Body parts:: organs:: transplants:

Anderson, W. L., & Barnett, A. (April 1999). Waiting for Transplants The Free Market, 17(4). Retrieved from http://mises.org/freemarket_detail.aspx?control=29

Barnett, A. (Monday, February 15, 1999). Die Waiting. Mises Daily. Retrieved from http://mises.org/daily/146

Barnett, W. I., Saliba, M., & Walker, D. (Winter 2001). A Free Market in Kidneys: Efficient and Equitable. The Independent Review, V(3), 373–385. Retrieved from http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_05_3_barnett.pdf

Barnett, William. 1988. The Market for Used Human Body Parts, The Free Market, Vol. 6, No. 2; http://mises.org/daily/4231.

Barnett, William II, and Michael Saliba. 2004. “A Free Market for Kidneys: Options, Futures, Forward, and Spot.” Managerial Finance. 30 (5): 38-56.

Beard, T. R., Jackson, J. D., & Kaserman, D. L. (Winter 2007-2008 ). The Failure of U.S. Organ Procurement Policy Regulation, 30(4). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1092920

Block, Walter E., Roy Whitehead, Clint Johnson, Mana Davidson, Alan White and Stacy Chandler. 1999-2000. “Human Organ Transplantation: Economic and Legal Issues,” Quinnipiac College School of Law Health Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 87-110; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Articles%20for%20web/Human%20Oragn… <http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Articles%20for%20web/Human%20Oragn… ; http://www.walterblock.com/publications/human_organ_transplantation.pdf

Block, Walter. 1987. “A Free Market in Kidneys?” The Freeman Ideas on Liberty, August, p. 308; http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=1802 <http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=1802 ; 8/25, Bensalem News.

Block, Walter. 1988. “Caveat Emptor,” The Freeman Ideas on Liberty, May, pp. 180-181, http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=1903.

Block, Walter. 1988. “The Case for a Free Market in Body Parts,” Essays in the Economics of Liberty: The Free Market Reader, Llewellyn Rockwell, ed., California: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp. 65-70, 195-199, 266-272. http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=476 http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=476

Block, Walter. June 2004. “Contracts.” Encyclopedia of Capitalism. New York: Facts On File, pp. 172-174

Carey, D. (Thursday, February 21, 2002 ). Let the Market Save Lives. Mises Daily. Retrieved from http://mises.org/daily/898

Cherry, Mark J., ed. 1999. Persons and Their Bodies: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Sale of Organs. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Clay, Megan and Walter E. Block. 2002. “A Free Market for Human Organs,” The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2, Summer, pp. 227-236;

Farber, Rafi. 2015. “On organ donation, Organ Sales, and Hypocrisy.” June 22;
On Organ Donation, Organ Sales, and Hypocrisy

Garner, Richard and Walter E. Block. 2008. “Harvesting organs on the final frontier: a critique of Star Trek.” Issue 2; pp. 65-xx. Ethics and Critical Thinking Journal; http://www.franklinpublishing.net/ethicscriticalthinking.html
http://www.walterblock.com/publications/market_human_organs.pdf <http://www.walterblock.com/publications/market_human_organs.pdf ; http://www.jspes.org/summer2002_clay.html

Healy, Kieran. 2006. Last Best Gifts: Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Hippen, Benjamin E. 2008. “Organ Sales and Moral Travails: Lessons from the Living Kidney Vendor Program in Iran” Cato Policy Analysis, 614; http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9273

Kaserman, D. L. Markets for Organs: Myths and Misconceptions. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 18. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/paper=327260

Kaserman, D. L., & Barnett, A. H. (2002). The U.S. Organ Procurement System: A Prescription for Reform (Evaluative Studies.). Washington D.C.: AEI Press.

Malek, N. P. (Friday, April 20, 2001). Sell Your Kidney, Make a Profit. Mises Daily. Retrieved from http://mises.org/daily/660

Richards, Janet Radcliffe. 2001. “Organs for sale.” Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. Vol. 9, No. 2, April-June; http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/092di047.html

Taylor, James Stacey. 2005. Stakes and Kidneys Why Markets in Human Body Parts are Morally Imperative Ashgate Publishing

Taylor, James Stacey. 2006. Why the ‘Black Market’ Arguments Against Legalizing Organ Sales Fail. Res Publica 12 (2).

Taylor, James Stacey. 2007. A “Queen of Hearts” Trial of Organ Markets: Why Scheper-Hughes’s Objections to Markets in Human Organs Fail. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):201-204.

Young, A. (January 07, 2004). Organ Donations: Socialism or Laissez-Faire? Mises Daily. Retrieved from http://mises.org/daily/1414

Wilkinson, Stephen. 2003. Bodies for sale: ethics and exploitation in the human body trade. New York: Routledge

Williams, Walter. 2013. “Unnecessarty Tragedy.” June 11; http://www.lewrockwell.com/williams-w/w-williams172.html

*
Transplant:: Body parts:: organs:: transplants:: organ:: donation::

Anderson, 2003; Anderson and Barnett,1999; Barnett, A., 1999; Barnett, W. 1988; Barnett, Saliba, & Walker, 2001; Barnett and Saliba, 2004; Beard, Jackson & Kaserman, 2007-2008; Block, Whitehead, Johnson, Davidson, White and Chandler. 1999-2000; Block, 1987, 1988A,1988B; Carey, 2002; Cherry, 1999; Clay and Block. 2002; Farber, 2015A, 2015B; Garner and Block. 2008; Healy, 2006; Hippen, 2008; Kaserman, 2002; Kaserman & Barnett, 2002; Malek, 2001; Richards, 2001; Taylor, 2005, 2006, 2007; Wilkinson, 2003; Young, 2004

Anderson, William L. 2003. “Communitarianism and Commodification,” February 27;
http://mises.org/story/1174

Anderson, W. L., & Barnett, A. 1999. “Waiting for Transplants.” The Free Market, 17(4). http://mises.org/freemarket_detail.aspx?control=29

Barnett, Andy. 1999. “Die Waiting.” Mises Daily. http://mises.org/daily/146

Barnett, William II., Michael Saliba, & Deborah Walker. 2001. “A Free Market in Kidneys: Efficient and Equitable.” The Independent Review, V(3), 373–385; http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_05_3_barnett.pdf

Barnett, William. 1988. The Market for Used Human Body Parts, The Free Market, Vol. 6, No. 2; http://mises.org/daily/4231.

Barnett, William II, and Michael Saliba. 2004. “A Free Market for Kidneys: Options, Futures, Forward, and Spot.” Managerial Finance. 30 (5): 38-56.

Barnett, William. 1988. The Market for Used Human Body Parts, The Free Market, Vol. 6, No. 2; http://mises.org/daily/4231.

Barnett, William II, and Michael Saliba. 2004. “A Free Market for Kidneys: Options, Futures, Forward, and Spot.” Managerial Finance. 30 (5): 38-56.

Beard, T. R., Jackson, J. D., & Kaserman, D. L. 2007-2008. “The Failure of U.S. Organ Procurement Policy.” Regulation, 30(4); http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1092920

Block, Walter E., Roy Whitehead, Clint Johnson, Mana Davidson, Alan White and Stacy Chandler. 1999-2000. “Human Organ Transplantation: Economic and Legal Issues,” Quinnipiac College School of Law Health Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 87-110; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Articles%20for%20web/Human%20Oragn; http://www.walterblock.com/publications/human_organ_transplantation.pdf

Block, Walter E. 1987. “A Free Market in Kidneys?” The Freeman Ideas on Liberty, August, p. 308; http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=1802 <http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=1802 ;

Block, Walter. 1988A. “Caveat Emptor,” The Freeman Ideas on Liberty, May, pp. 180-181, http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=1903.

Block, Walter. 1988B. “The Case for a Free Market in Body Parts,” Essays in the Economics of Liberty: The Free Market Reader, Llewellyn Rockwell, ed., California: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp. 65-70, 195-199, 266-272; http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=476

Carey, D. 2002 . “Let the Market Save Lives.” Mises Daily. February 21; http://mises.org/daily/898

Cherry, Mark J., ed. 1999. Persons and Their Bodies: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Sale of Organs. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Clay, Megan and Walter E. Block. 2002. “A Free Market for Human Organs,” The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2, Summer, pp. 227-236;
http://www.walterblock.com/publications/market_human_organs.pdf;
http://www.jspes.org/summer2002_clay.html

Farber, Rafi. 2015A. “On organ donation, Organ Sales, and Hypocrisy.” June 22;
On Organ Donation, Organ Sales, and Hypocrisy

Farber, Rafi. 2015B. “Shock and Awe! Rabbi Shmuly Supports Human Organ Sales .” October 5; http://www.targetliberty.com/2015/10/shock-and-awe-rabbi-shmuly-supports.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TargetLiberty+%28Target+Liberty%29

Garner, Richard and Walter E. Block. 2008. “Harvesting organs on the final frontier: a critique of Star Trek.” Issue 2; pp. 65-75. Ethics and Critical Thinking Journal; http://www.franklinpublishing.net/ethicscriticalthinking.html
http://www.walterblock.com/publications/market_human_organs.pdf

Healy, Kieran. 2006. Last Best Gifts: Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Hippen, Benjamin E. 2008. “Organ Sales and Moral Travails: Lessons from the Living Kidney Vendor Program in Iran.” Cato Policy Analysis, 614; http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9273

Kaserman, D. L. 2002. “Markets for Organs: Myths and Misconceptions.” Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 18; http://ssrn.com/paper=327260

Kaserman, D. L., & Barnett, A. H. 2002. The U.S. Organ Procurement System: A Prescription for Reform (Evaluative Studies). Washington D.C.: AEI Press.

Malek, N. P. 2001. Sell Your Kidney, Make a Profit. Mises Daily. April 20, http://mises.org/daily/660

Richards, Janet Radcliffe. 2001. “Organs for sale.” Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. Vol. 9, No. 2, April-June; http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/092di047.html

Taylor, James Stacey. 2005. Stakes and Kidneys Why Markets in Human Body Parts are Morally Imperative. Ashgate Publishing

Taylor, James Stacey. 2006. “Why the ‘Black Market’ Arguments Against Legalizing Organ Sales Fail.” Res Publica 12 (2).

Taylor. James Stacey. 2007. “A ‘Queen of Hearts’ Trial of Organ Markets: Why Scheper-Hughes’s Objections to Markets in Human Organs Fail.” Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):201-204.

Young, Adam. 2004. “Organ Donations: Socialism or Laissez-Faire?” Mises Daily. January 07; http://mises.org/daily/1414

Wilkinson, Stephen. 2003. Bodies for sale: ethics and exploitation in the human body trade. New York: Routledge

Con:

Etzoini, Undated; Scheper-Hughes, 2002, 2005; Sullivan, 1983;

Etzioni, Amitai. Undated. “Organ Donation: A Communitarian Approach.”
https://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/Organ_Donation.pdf

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 2002. “The Ends of the Body–Commodity Fetishism and the Global Traffic in Organs” SAIS Review 22(1):61-80, January; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236821086_The_Ends_of_the_Body–Commodity_Fetishism_and_the_Global_Traffic_in_Organs

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 2005. “The Ultimate Commodity.” The Lancet.
Volume 366, No. 9494, pp. 1349–1350, 15 October
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)67550-2/abstract

Sullivan, Walter. 1983. “Buying of kidneys of poor attacked.” September 24;
http://www.nytimes.com/1983/09/24/us/buying-of-kidneys-of-poor-attacked.html

2. Health:: Socialized medicine:: health care:

Block, 2003; Friedman, 1962; Goodman and Musgrave, 1992; Gratzer, 2005; Hamowy, 1984; Herbener, 1996; Holly, 2013; Hoppe, 1993; Johnson, et.al., 1998; Laydon and Block, 1996; McGuff and Murphy, 2015; Porter, 2006; Terrell, 2003.

Block, Walter. 2003. “Socialized Medicine is the Problem,” Surgical Neurology, Vol. 60, No. 5, November, pp. 467-46

Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, chapter 9

Goodman, John C. and Gerald L. Musgrave, 1992. Patient Power: Solving America’s Health Care Crisis. Washington D.C.: Cato

Gratzer, David. 2005. “The Return of HillaryCare: Socialized medicine is still not a good idea. The Weekly Standard. May 23; http://www.medicalprogresstoday.com/spotlight/spotlight_indarchive.php?id=778

Hamowy, Ronald. 1984. Canadian Medicine: A Study in Restricted Entry, Vancouver: The Fraser Institute

Herbener, Jeffrey. 1996. “Socialized Medicine, Take Two.” The Free Market. Vol. 14, No. 7, July. http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=172&sortorder=articledate

Holly, Mike.2013. “How Government Regulations Made Healthcare So Expensive.” December 17;
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/12/how-government-regulations-made-healthcare-so-expensive/

Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1993. “A Four-Step Health-Care Solution.” The Free Market. Vol. 11, No. 4, April; http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=279

Johnson, Clint, Walter E. Block and Thomas Oxner. 1998. “Notes on Health Care Financing and Free Markets,” Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, Vol. 1, No. 3, Summer 1998, pp. 488-502.

Layden, William R. and Walter E. Block. 1996. “Health Security,” Nomos, July, No. 47/48, pp. 38-45

McGuff, Doug and Robert P. Murphy. 2015. The Primal Prescription: Surviving the “Sick Care” Sinkhole; http://store.mises.org/Primal-Prescription-Surviving-The-Sick-Care-Sinkhole-P11014.aspx

Porter, Michael 2006. Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results: Harvard Business Review Press. https://www.amazon.com/dp/1591397782/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_dp_T2_GoRuzbVZG2TDD

Terrell, Timothy D. 2003. “Socialized Medicine in America.” The Free Market. Vol. 23, No. 11, November; http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=458&sortorder=articledate

Socialized medicine: queues:

Barua, et. al., 2010; DiLorenzo, 2009; Esmail, 2009A, 2009B, 2011; Globerman and Hoye, 1990; Hazel and Esmail, 2008; Sanmartin et al., 2004;

Barua, Bacchus, Mark Rovere, and Brett J. Skinner. 2010. Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada (20th ed.). Fraser Institute.

DiLorenzo, Thomas J. 2009. “Socialized Healthcare vs. The Laws Of Economics,” Mises Daily, no. 3586; July 28; http://mises.org/daily/3586

Esmail, Nadeem. 2009A. Waiting Your Turn: Hospital Waiting Lists in Canada (19th ed.). Fraser Institute

Esmail, Nadeem. 2009B. The Private Cost Of Public Queues, 2009. Fraser Forum (November):32-36.

Esmail, Nadeem. 2011. “The private cost of public queues.” Fraser Forum, March/April, pp. 22-27; http://www.fraserinstitute.org/uploadedFiles/fraser-ca/Content/research-news/research/articles/private-cost-of-public-queues-march2011.pdf

Globerman, Steven, with Lorna Hoye. 1990. Waiting Your Turn: Hospital Waiting Lists in Canada. Fraser Institute.

Hazel, Maureen and Nadeem Esmail. 2008. The Private Cost of Public Queues. Fraser Forum (December/January):25–29.

Sanmartin, Claudia, François Gendron, Jean-Marie Berthelot, and Kellie Murphy. 2004. Access to Health Care Services in Canada, 2003. Catalogue No. 82-575-XIE.

H.T. Engelhardt, Jr., and Kevin W. Wildes, S.J., “The Four Principles of Health Care and Post-Modernity: Why a Libertarian Interpretation is Unavoidable,” Principles of Health Care Ethics, ed. Raanan Gillon (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994), pp. 135-147.

Share

10:52 pm on June 27, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }

My Recent Hour Long Interview With A Canadian Libertarian

Email Print

Share

June 26, 2017. Kyle McCormack [mailto:[email protected]] The morality (or lack there of) of government, as a First Principle of Libertarianism. Is a nation-state required to establish a culture of freedom and tolerance? Why or why not? Free-market environmentalism – how will libertarians protect nature? The “Big” Topic: Libertarian Borders – Open, Closed, Something Else? (Privatize Everything, right?) Explain real anarchy to the audience – why should we privatize everything? Ending on: what is the BEST way to begin the process of waking up a left-leaning big-government individual to the concepts and truths of Liberty?

https://www.patreon.com/posts/episode-014-june-12188293

Share

4:22 pm on June 27, 2017

Please follow and like us:
{ 0 comments }
RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Google+
http://walterblock.com/
Twitter