The name “Peale” is
synonymous with the First Family of American painting. The painters of the
Peale family were the first “dynasty” of American art, and what a dynasty! They
established norms of subject matter and style when the American painting school
was in its infancy. However, mostly the Peale men are discussed in art history
texts, because that’s just what most art history texts do: ignore most women
artists. Many are familiar with Charles Willson (1741–1828), the patriarch of
the dynasty; his brother James (1749–1831); Charles’ sons Rubens (1784–1865),
Raphaelle (1774–1825) and Rembrandt (1778–1860); and even the cousin Charles
Peale Polk (1767–1822). Rarely are the daughters, nieces, and women in-laws who
were also professional painters mentioned in art history books. They were
definitely pioneers of the American painting school like their male Peale
dynasty counterparts. Here are four of them.
![]() |
| Anna Claypoole Peale (1798–1878), Portrait miniature of an unknown woman, 1818. Watercolor on ivory, 2 7/8" x 2 1/4" (7.3 x 5.7 cm). © Art Institute of Chicago. (AIC-337) |
Peale was born and spent most of her life in Philadelphia,
although she also made trips to Washington, DC; Boston; Baltimore; and New York
to fulfill portrait commissions. Although after 1823 she relied primarily on
commissions for portrait miniatures, she also continued to paint full-scale
portraits, landscapes, and still life.
In 1824, Peale and her sister Sarah Miriam were the first
two women to be elected members of the prestigious Pennsylvania Academy of Fine
Arts. Between 1824 and 1842 Anna’s reputation was such that she had more
commissions than she could comfortably handle. She retired from painting in
1841 after her second marriage.
![]() |
| Margaretta Angelica Peale (1795–1882), Melon, Cherries and Plums, 1836. Oil on canvas, 13 3/4" x 18 15/16" (34.9 x 48.2 cm). © Philadelphia Museum of Art. (PMA-6421) |
James Peale was known almost exclusively for his still life
paintings, although he also did portraits. Margaretta Angelica, named (as
Charles Willson did his sons) after famous artists: the Baroque still life
painter Margerhita Caffi (1650–1710) and the Swiss Neoclassical painter
Angelica Kauffmann (1741–1807), was the most accomplished of James’ children in
still life painting. Trained by her father, she exhibited at the Pennsylvania
Academy between 1828 and 1837, and is mentioned in their records between the
1820s and 1865.
Like her father and cousin, Raphaelle, Margaretta Angelica
used clear outlines and generalized forms. Characteristic of Peale family still
life painting, the forms are arranged on a shelf parallel to the picture plane,
with a diagonal light raking across the objects, the background lit from dark
to light in the opposite direction.
![]() |
| Anna Peale Sellers (1824–1905), Still Life with Fruit after James Peale, ca. 1875. Oil on canvas, 19" x 27" (48.3 x 68.6 cm). © Philadelphia Museum of Art. (PMA-6422) |
Anna Peale Sellers was the granddaughter of Charles Willson from his daughter Sophonisba Angusciola (1786–1859). Like many of the Peale painters, instruction was a family affair. She, too, learned the Peale style of still life painting. She was also an accomplished portrait painter, often copying the portraits done by her uncles or great uncle James.
The similarity to James’ still life formula is striking,
with the only difference being in the direction of the raking light depicted in
the background. Like her uncle, her still life objects often show slight decay,
much like many Dutch Baroque still life painters did.
This is probably a copy of a James Peale work of 1825 now in
the Munson Williams Proctor Art Institute.
The composition was also copied by her uncle Rubens and aunt Harriet Cany Peale
(1800–1860), wife (and student) of Rembrandt.
![]() |
| James Peale (1749–1831), A Porcelain Bowl with Fruit, 1830. Oil on canvas, 16 3/8" x 22 3/8" (41.6 x 56.8 cm). © Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. (MFAB-441) |
![]() |
| Mary Jane Peale (1827–1902), Charles Willson Peale (1821–1871), Son of Rubens Peale, ca. 1845. Oil on canvas, 22 7/8" x 19 5/8" (58.1 x 49.8 cm). © Philadelphia Museum of Art. (PMA-6423) |
Her portrait of her older brother is probably a copy of an
existing painting. An early work, it betrays a certain naïve quality not
present in her later portraits. Although she may have referenced photography in
her later portraits, I doubt she referred to a Daguerreotype in 1845, because
the long exposure times of those early photographic portraits was often 30 to
60 seconds and would not yield such an animated pose.
Correlations to Davis
programs: Explorations in Art Grade 1: 1.4, 2.8; Explorations in Art Grade 2:
2.8; Explorations in Art Grade 3: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3; Explorations in Art Grade 5:
1.1, 2.7, 2.8, 2.studio 7-8; Explorations in Art Grade 6: 1.1, 1.6; A Personal
Journey 2.6; A Community Connection: 2.3, 3.4, 4.4, 6.2; Exploring Painting: 6;
Experience Painting: 7, 9; The Visual Experience: 9.3, 16.3, 16.4






















