

|
Loading... Oryx and Crake (2003)by Margaret Atwood
![]()
Best Dystopias (16) » 56 more Booker Prize (38) Favourite Books (187) Female Author (110) Genre Benders (10) Top Five Books of 2014 (883) Sense of place (8) Five star books (79) A Novel Cure (65) Books Read in 2013 (943) 2000s decade (13) Favorite Series (197) Magic Realism (273) Unread books (439) Read in 2015 (2) Books I read in 2014 (10) Read These Too (27) KayStJ's to-read list (690) To Read (5) Fiction For Men (114) Robinsonade Novels (50) io9 Book Club (5) Best Love Stories (56) Clones! (4) Best Satires (86)
1 A dystopic fantasy, very well written but leaves me with the one big question: what's the bl..dy point? The characters lack the psychological depth of their counterparts in Atwoods short stories, which is real pity. The relation between Jimmy, Crake and Oryx is rather superficial. As in all fantasies there is a lot of explaining going on to introduce a world different from our own, which is not paricularly exciting. Suspense, on the whole, is scarce. I was honestly surprised how easily I was pulled into this story.I could not get enough of it and listened to it wherever I went, finding myself listening for even one minute at a time doing around the house chores. This is really a shocking story that is going to make you think about how things are and how they could be. I ended up reflecting a lot on what I read and how it made me feel for the future, both for myself and for the world. The scariest thing about this story wasn't what was happening, it was how believable everything was. A reader would have no trouble at all thinking about what is being said and realizing the things going on in the book could easily start happening here and now on any given day. Science fiction fans should enjoy it, fans of dystopian stories should enjoy it, and even newcomers to these genres might just get so caught up in the book they find a new type of book to read. I will certainly be finishing the series.
Oryx and Crake is a piece of dystopian fiction written from the point of Snowman (known as Jimmy in his former life) – the last human left on Earth. At least, he believes he’s the last human left on Earth until the end of the book. I found the parts of the book describing Snowman’s journey to Paradice (the dome in the compound where Crake did his work) to be a lot less interesting than his recollections of his previous life as Jimmy. I loved reading about how Jimmy and Crake met, the little signs that Crake gave off as to what he might be planning and the direction his thoughts might take in the future (though Jimmy didn’t recognize these until it was too late), etc. Crake is really the star of the show in this book in my mind – Jimmy simply acts as a vessel for us to learn about a character who is dead and who therefore cannot teach us about himself. Snowman’s adventures in real time seem almost pointless to me. Why not dedicate the whole book to Jimmy’s friendship with Crake, with just a bit of general explanation as to what’s going on now? I think the present would have been much more interesting if the Crakers were explored more than Jimmy’s struggle to survive and come to grips with what Crake had done. On the whole, however, I thought it was a great book. Set sometime in the future, this post-apocalyptic novel takes scientific research in the hands of madmen to its logical and frightening conclusion. Inspiring readers to pay more attention to the world around them, Atwood offers cautionary notes about the environment, bioengineering, the sacrifice of civil liberties, and the possible loss of those human values which make life more than just a physical experience. As the novel opens, some catastrophe has occurred, effectively wiping out human life. Only one lonely survivor and a handful of genetically altered humanoids remain, and they are slowly starving as they try to adjust to their changed circumstances. In Margaret Atwood's first attempt at writing a novel, the main character was an ant swept downriver on a raft. She abandoned that book after the opening scene and became caught up in other activities, which she has described as ''sissy stuff like knitting and dresses and stuffed bunnies.'' That certainly does not sound like Ms. Atwood, who is known for the boldness of her fiction. Of course she was only 7 at the time. Margaret Atwood has always taken a jaundiced view of human nature. Back when her mordant observations about marriage and other relations between the sexes had her marked down as a feminist, she took pains to fire off several novels in a row featuring weak, manipulative, dishonest and outright bad women, partly to prove that her skepticism was distributed fairly. She has always been of the opinion that people are a mixed bag of the occasionally decent and the frequently mendacious and that there's not much anyone can do to change that fact. Genetic tinkering. Rampant profiteering. A deadly virus that sweeps the globe. Are these last Tuesday's headlines or our future? In Margaret Atwood's novel Oryx and Crake, the answer is both. For Atwood, our future is the catastrophic sum of our oversights. It's a depressing view, saved only by Atwood's biting, black humor and absorbing storytelling.
References to this work on external resources.
|
Google Books — Loading...
Popular coversRatingAverage: (3.96)
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Throughout the book, the reader was told Snowman was the only human left on earth. Even in apocalyptic situations, there's no way to know such a thing, so it rang shallow and dramatic. The story vascillated between present(future really) and past, pre- and post-apocalypse, if you will -- before and after a massive plague. I did like the ending -- it left room for a sequel, assuming the original was any good, and I wouldn't read a sequel. The story could make an interesting movie as there is plenty of fodder for visual effects. (