Thursday, November 07, 2019

Myths and Mistakes Now Available

0
A new book on textual criticism is now available!

 

The New Testament is important, and defending it is important, but what we've noticed is that occasionally well-meaning defenders rely on other well-meaning defenders. If left unchecked, this can lead to a chain of citations that go back to resources now-outdated with plenty of opportunity to make mistakes along the way.

One problem is that it's really hard for any one person to be up-to-date on everything. There's no way around it—that's difficult. That's why this book is a co-edited multi-author volume and not a monograph. We thought that this sort of project is better done by a team of people, each of whom can do one thing well, than by one person trying to do all the things well.

So what is the book? It's a self-corrective written by people who value the New Testament and think it should be defended, written for people who value the New Testament and want to defend it. We've taken some common mistakes about manuscripts and textual criticism that show up in "Why Trust the New Testament" talks, explained why these common mistakes are mistakes or otherwise poor arguments and tried to show what a better way might be.

Over at The Gospel Coalition, Justin Taylor has blogged some of our "Key Takeaways", which we put at the end of each chapter. Of course, the chapters explain why we assert what we assert here, but Taylor's post is a great example of what kinds of things the book aims to explain.

Wednesday, November 06, 2019

Dead Sea Scroll Detectives Airs Tonight (U.S.)

1
With apologies to Pete Head for the double post today, I thought U.S. readers may like to know about the following episode of NOVA airing tonight on PBS.



Since the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in 1947, these fragile parchment relics have intrigued scholars, religious leaders, and profiteers alike. The 2,000-year-old scrolls include the oldest-known versions of the Hebrew Bible and hold vital clues about the birth of Christianity. While certain scrolls have survived intact, others have been ravaged by time—burnt, decayed, or torn to pieces—and remain an enigma. Now, scientists are using new technologies to read the unreadable, solve mysteries that have endured for millennia, and even discover million-dollar fakes. (Premiering November 6, 2019 at 9 pm on PBS)
More info here

Codex Zacynthius Study Day

2


Yesterday ITSEE organised a Study Day at Oriel College in Oxford to report on their research project on Codex Zacynthius (Cambridge, UL, MS Additional 10062) (for a previous contribution from this blog see here). It was a great day with very informative presentations and far too much to summarise here. Basically the project involves:
  • Complete transcription of overtext
  • MSI images (July 2018 EMEL): 51 images of each page (will be made available)
  • Base transcription by combining Greenlee & Tregelles – check against images
  • Identify sources of scholia (TLG etc.)
  • Transcription of scholia and ET (adjusted from NRSV)
  • Online and Printed Edition (Gorgias Press)
So some highlights:

The project is proposing three corrections to the text of Luke in 040 as currently understood (via Tregelles and Greenlee): Luke 1.6: read ἐναντίον τοῦ θεοῦ (with NA28 txt); Luke 7.21: read ἐν ἐκείνῃ (with NA28 txt); 8.46: read ἐξεληλυθυῖαν (with NA28 txt).

The text of Luke is not completely continuous, since the text ahs to keep in line with the commentary, so, for example, on 17 occasions a verse is repeated on the next page because comments continue; and twice a verse appears on three pages, e.g. Luke 9.1 has 3 pages of commentary)

The scholia are connected with the text through a numerical system: 328 passages have associated scholia (in the extreme three verses have five scholia: Luke 1.2; 1.43; 9.29). The scholiast is careful to identify sources (sometimes, esp with Severus of Antioch, to particular books or letters). Ten different authors named: Cyril of Alexandria (145); Origen (68), Titus of Bostra (49), Severus of Antioch (29) [latest author, he died in 538; condemned as heretic in 536] ...

34 scholia: ‘from the unattributed collection’
Most can be identified (TLG), but 44 (14%) have no parallel in TLG
NB online checklist of NT catena MSS: http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/3086
Quite a close parallel in GA 747 (Paris): similar catena in content and structure

The scribe of the lectionary (lect 299) was named Nilos who made many little comments about his own failings; the same scribe also wrote Vat. Gr. 788 in AD 1170 (palimpsest, said by Devresse that the underwriting is illegible).

Here is a facsimile from Tregelles (1861) and the same page in a recent photo from the UL:


Here is a video on the Mult-Spectral Imaging:



For more on the project see here.
For more from the UL see here.
For forthcoming publication see here and here.

Friday, November 01, 2019

Congrats to Klaus Wachtel

9
Congratulations to Klaus Wachtel on his retirement!

Source of un-doctored image: Hugh Houghton's Twitter

Yesterday, the INTF posted the following:


Klaus has been a constant presence in textual criticism for many years now. I've personally benefitted much from his writings on the Byzantine text, and more recently, his textual commentary of Acts in the ECM Acts: Studies volume. May he have a happy retirement!

Congrats also to Greg Paulson as he steps into his new position within the INTF!

Wednesday, October 30, 2019

New Book on the Doctrine of Preservation by Richard Brash

10
Outside of certain TR or KJV-only circles, the doctrine of preservation doesn’t seem to get a lot of attention from Protestants anymore. Bill Combs and Dan Wallace have written on it, but those are the only sustained treatments I know of. Theologians seem to focus on issues of inspiration, inerrancy, clarity, and the like, but not on preservation. Maybe some of that is because of a desire to avoid being embroiled in debates with TR or KJV-only folks.

But Richard Brash has been doing some good, historical work on the doctrine of preservation in the Reformed tradition for the last few years. I’ve mentioned his ThM work before and he now has a summarized version of that in the latest issue of Westminster Theological Journal titled “Ad Fontes!—The Concept of the ‘Originals’ of Scripture in Seventeenth Century Reformed Orthodoxy.” Jeff Riddle has written a really nice summary for those without access.

Having done this historical work, Richard has now turned to the doctrine of preservation itself in a new book with Christian Focus. It’s intended for a lay audience and gives his own, positive view of divine preservation. Importantly, Richard’s account appears to be neither that of modern TR proponents nor of KJV-onlyists. As I have found Richard’s historical work on the question very helpful, I’m looking forward to this new book too. I hope I can give a report on it when I get my copy.

Here’s a video introducing it


Thursday, October 24, 2019

5 Surprising Details about the Initial Discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls

3
Several details about the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls are common knowledge. Many in the public, for example, are aware that approximately seventy years ago Bedouin accidentally discovered hundreds of ancient manuscripts near the Dead Sea. Although many understand a few general details about this discovery, several other details are less known, and perhaps even surprising. I discovered many of these details and many more while reading Weston W. Fields' Dead Sea Scrolls: A Full History. Here are five less known and surprising details about the initial discovery of these manuscripts and the subsequent few months of trying to sell them.

1) The discovery of these manuscripts in 1947 by Bedouin was not the first-time manuscripts were discovered near the Dead Sea. In the third century AD, Origen discovered a manuscript preserving psalms in a cave near Jericho (22). Then, again in the eighth or ninth century AD, several manuscripts with psalms attributed to David were discovered near Jericho (29 n38).

2) The Bedouin did not rush to sell their newly discovered treasure but waited until they “had occasion” in the words of Fields (26). Before making it to market, it has been reported that one manuscript was destroyed by children playing. The scraps of that manuscript were then thrown away (26)! Other reports claim that pieces were used as sandal straps, but Fields believes this story to be unlikely (26).

3) When the Bedouin finally arrived at market (roughly two months or so after the discovery), they had a difficult time selling these manuscripts. A suspicion that the scrolls were stolen led the first, or perhaps even the first two antiquities dealers to pass on purchasing these manuscripts, at less initially. Fields suggests that the Bedouin were only looking for a small amount of money in exchange for the manuscripts in their possession (26). These manuscripts were likely 1QIsaa, the Habakkuk Commentary, and the Manual of Discipline in two pieces (29).

4) The Syrian Orthodox Metropolitan Mar Athanasius Yeshue Samuel purchased 1QIsaa, the Habakkuk Commentary, and the Manual of Discipline. He, however, almost missed his opportunity to buy them when the monastery steward at St. Mark’s monastery in Jerusalem sent the Bedouin away because the manuscripts were written in Hebrew, not Syriac (29-30).

5) Kando, a Bethlehem merchant who became acquainted with the manuscripts because he could verify that they were written on leather, agreed to sell 1QIsaa, the Habakkuk Commentary, and the Manual of Discipline for the Bedouin on consignment for commission (one-third of the purchase price). He sold these manuscripts to Samuel for roughly $97 saying, “Much dirty paper for little clean paper” (33 n52). Samuel later sold his scrolls in 1954 for $250,000.

First four columns of 1QIsaa
http://dss.collections.imj.org.il/isaiah
The story of the discovery, collection, reconstruction, and publication of the Dead Sea Scrolls is a riveting tale that Weston Fields traces and narrates in Dead Sea Scrolls: A Full History. Anyone interested in these manuscripts will find the details recorded here quite fascinating and worth the time to read and enjoy.

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Titles of the New Testament Postdoc in Dublin

0
Dublin
Garrick Allen of Dublin City University has just received funding for a 3-year postdoc to work on a project on manuscript titles. Titles are a very interesting but often neglected part of manuscripts (for example). I bet this project will be a fun one to work on. And Dublin is a great city. I’m tempted to apply myself!

The Project 

The Titles of the New Testament: A New Approach to Manuscripts and the History of Interpretation (TiNT) project is funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement n° 847428). The project seeks to digitally edit every form of every title in every non-lectionary Greek manuscript that preserves part of the New Testament, using this data to contribute to new research related to six research questions: (1) the diachronic development of paratextual traditions; (2) the provenance of New Testament works; (3) the relationship between bibliography and canon; (4) the design and artistic features of manuscripts; (5) scribal identities; and (6) traditions of textual segmentation. The data produced by the project will also raise new research questions and be publicly available. The objectives of the project are to rethink the critical value of manuscripts beyond the purely textual concerns of traditional textual criticism and to explore titular traditions as expressive modes of communication and as aspects of reception history. The Principle Investigator (PI) and team members will work together to produce titular profiles for each manuscript, using this information to inform innovative research on specific research topics. 

Minimum Criteria 

Applicants should have a PhD in a discipline relevant to the project, like New Testament studies, classics, early Christianity, Byzantine studies, art history or manuscripts studies. Excellent knowledge of Koine Greek is essential, and familiarity with other relevant languages (esp. Latin) is ideal. Basic computer competence is required and familiarity and experience with digital editorial or philological tools is expected. Etc.

Closing date

1st December 2019

Make sure to read the full description as there is important info I haven’t included here.