Nicola Sturgeon’s empty threats help no one 

Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland's first minister and leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP), speaks during the Institute of Directors (IoD) Annual Convention 2016 at the Royal Albert Hall in London, U.K., on Tuesday, Sept. 27, 2016
The SNP leader is demanding a 'soft' Brexit Credit: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg
Scotland’s First Minister says she is not bluffing in threatening another independence referendum unless the UK stays in the European single market after Brexit. Nicola Sturgeon offers this by way of a “compromise”: if Theresa May ensures a “soft” departure from the EU then Scotland will remain in the United Kingdom, for now at least.
There is no doubt that Miss Sturgeon’s voice must be heard in the Brexit debate. One of Mrs May’s first acts on becoming Prime Minister last July was to travel to Edinburgh for talks. Under the devolution agreement, strengthened since Scotland decided to remain in the UK, the Scottish government must be consulted about matters that affect its future; and clearly Brexit will have a big impact on Scotland, where a clear majority voted to stay in the EU, as it will in the rest of the country.
Nicola Sturgeon: Scotland 'not bluffing' on second independence referendum Watch | Nicola Sturgeon: Scotland 'not bluffing' on second independence referendum
00:19
But it is hard for Scotland’s government to play a full role in deciding the best way of negotiating our way out of the EU if Ms Sturgeon continues to threaten the break-up of the UK at every juncture. The SNP, of course, wants separation; that is the party’s creed. However, it is also has an obligation to administer the country in the best interests of its people.
It frankly beggars belief that so many months on from the referendum we still don't know answers to basic questionsNicola Sturgeon on Brexit
To that end, as Mrs May observed in her Sky TV interview on Sunday, retaining privileged access to the single market and controlling our borders are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Much will depend on what our EU partners are prepared to offer and we do not know what that is yet. But whatever the outcome of the negotiations, it is hard to see what benefit would accrue to the Scots were the UK to leave the EU and Scotland at the same time cede from the Union. 
It would lose both its major trading partners in one go, since it would not be allowed just to carry on as a member of the EU without applying to rejoin. Moreover, there would be a hard border with England, which is far and away Scotland’s biggest market.  
After the Brexit vote last June, Miss Sturgeon said another independence vote was inevitable; now she has backed away because she knows she would lose it and scupper the separatist cause for generations. If she really has the interests of her fellow Scots at heart then she would drop this empty threat and help Mrs May deliver a Brexit in the interests of the entire nation, Scotland included.

Profile | Nicola Sturgeon

Born:
19 July 1970 (age 46)
Position:First Minister of Scotland
Constituency:Glasgow Southside
MP since:1999
Education:University of Glasgow
Life outside politics:Worked as a solicitor before being elected and is married to Peter Murrell, the SNP’s chief executive. When she’s not politic-ing, she likes a bit of X-Factor
Areas of interest:Aside from her pursuit of Scottish independence, Sturgeon has campaigned for nuclear disarmament since joining the SNP aged 16
Did you know?She first stood for parliament in 1992 - the same year she graduated - becoming Scotland’s youngest parliamentary candidate

“Every day I hold this office, I will work to ensure that every woman, every wee girl across this country, gets a chance to do what I’ve done and follow their dream”
- Nicola Sturgeon, May 2015
Show more
Sponsored
If you would like to add a comment, please register or log in
Please review our commenting policy
12 comments
68 people listening
Dave Smith 5ptsFeatured
She won't go for Indy2 for the foreseeable future not just because she has no chance of winning but because she's a career politician and has no fallback after a certain  career ending indy2   defeat.  Human beings are selfish animals which is why Krankie will never risk losing her £150,000  annual salary ( 10 times her bog standard trainer lawyer salary) so she'll hang on to the end of the current parliament by that time she will have fleeced over £1,000,000 in wages from the taxpayer.
Paul O'Grady 5ptsFeatured
It is very wrong to assume that Scotland would not keep the UK seat. This is largely a legal question, and I am fairly confident that the ECJ or the ICJ would rule that it can retain the UK seat.
On other points, the EU has consistently stated that membership of the single market / EEA requires the four freedoms. It is in the DNA of that construct. what on earth makes May or anyone else think that theywill change this position which is enshrined in the treaties and is supported by ECJ rulings? That is deluded.
Back to Indyref2, if leave can win from having support in the 30s, Sturgeon can with with 45 in the bank. Especially as EU citizens and 16 yea olds will have a vote. Bye bye England and Wales.
Simon Coulter 5ptsFeatured
She does not possess the competence to hold a second referendum, will not get one, and knows all of this - but being SNP there is no other goal whatsoever in her life.
gary boulter 5ptsFeatured
she keeps saying she will call a referendum, but she does not have that power, and as with all threats, the easiest ways to get through it is to either ignore it, and do what you want, or call their bluff.  sturgeon knows she will lose another referendum, as the scots know that a hard border with England would kill their biggest export market, and it is only really the rabid "independence whatever the cost" loonies that would want that, plus the EU would never allow scotland to join, spain and belgium being the main ones who would veto this.  so both major markets would be lost in one fell stroke.  and an economy as small as scotland would not be able to survive as the socialist utopia that sturgeon reckons it will be!
Paul O'Grady 5ptsFeatured
I suspect that Spain is an irrelevance - or at least Rajoy, who is on a political life support. The issue would almost certainly only be decied in the European or international Court of Justice if any current Eu state tried to block.
Show more
Matt Ad Blocker Message

Your support makes a big difference

In order to bring you award-winning content and investigative journalism from your favourite writers, we rely on revenue generated by advertising.
Please consider supporting us by turning off your ad blocker.
Just a couple of clicks will make a big difference.
Thank you.
Need help?
Click here for instructions
lg
lg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%