Alan Levinovitz

@AlanLevinovitz

Professing . Religion, literature, science, and medicine. Working on book about Nature and natural. Read The Gluten Lie first!

ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 2013 ಸಮಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಸೇರಿದ್ದಾರೆ

@AlanLevinovitz ತಡೆಹಿಡಿಯಲಾಗಿದೆ

ನೀವು ಖಚಿತವಾಗಿಯೂ ಈ ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಲು ಬಯಸುವಿರಾ? ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡುವುದು @AlanLevinovitz ಅವರನ್ನು ತಡೆತೆರವುಗೊಳಿಸುವುದಿಲ್ಲ.

  1. ಪಿನ್ ಮಾಡಿದ ಟ್ವೀಟ್
  2. New levels of ridickulousness.

  3. Try to avoid pro/anti dichotomy. W/r/t GMOs, abortion, guns, etc., it turns genuinely complicated issues into ideological war.

  4. "Hoist with his owne petar[d]." "Shot by his own gun."

  5. If you know the philosopher John Rawls, allow me to introduce his son, Alec: For real.

  6. Are you a paid editor? No? Then don't correct people's spelling, you a-hole.

  7. I won't be looking back and fretting over if my body was good enough, if I ate 'right' or did enough workouts -Jodie

  8. . Many skeptics have a low amp breaker switch. They hear 1 or 2 things they disagree with, so... 1/n

  9. "President Trump's greatest contribution was how he taught children about civil discourse."

  10. Another prob w/science reporting: "Significantly more likely" sounds to lay public like "WAY more likely", not "statistically meaningful."

  11. OMG!!!! NOT USING CELLPHONES LINKED TO EARLY DEATH IN "GAME-CHANGING" STUDY

  12. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . The subhed was moved to lede! And it's not about "accuracy." It's about how the story is framed. (Not to mention the pic!)

  13. And we will use remote mind-vacuum to erase it from brains of terrified readers, most of whom won't see the new one.

  14. Exaggerated health scare stories are like bizarro "The Boy Who Cried Wolf." Instead of believing none of them we believe them all.

  15. I guess it's a formula: "Scores" of scientists. Hordes! Legions! THINK OF THE CHILDREN

  16. This is hilarious. Before and after shots. No , it's still not responsible reporting. cc

  17. This is how to properly report/tweet on the new cell phone study. See? Not so hard.

  18. The top story on . The picture they choose to accompany the headline. Insanity.

  19. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . I just can't believe it. It's like the skit never happened. Who approved that? It's INSANE.

  20. tweets like this one, and it is a cancer that threatens public health in a real way. Is it worth the clicks? For shame. 8/8

  21. any journalistic integrity, publish an apology and a correction. This is worse than a bad study. The REAL CANCER spread by cellphones is 7/n

  22. and how similar it is to the techniques of anti-vaccine fearmongers. YOU are the problem, not those scared parents. If you have 6/n

  23. lies. And when you sit around wondering why some people are SCARED TO VACCINATE CHILDREN, think about the f-ing headline you just ran 5/n

  24. should be ashamed, . This isn't just getting some clicks. This is the very worst thing you could do. It's worse than tabloid 4/n

  25. have the resources to fact-check articles. It open the door to charlatans and quacks, by exploiting fear of a devastating disease. You 3/n

  26. It contributes to the kind of science illiteracy that laments in other areas. It scares the CRAP out of people who don't 2/n

  27. And so begins a rant, cc'd to . Writing this headline isn't just irresponsible journalism. 1/n

  28. . Also, by "now more than ever" I mean "please for the love of science don't be scared by this study I am joking."

  29. I don't know why, but this story makes me incredibly happy.

  30. Powerful rebuttal of pro-Thiel arguments. "Wanted: Better Defenses of Peter Thiel"

  31. Directing all Party media organs to thoroughly study "Peter Thielism." We had no idea capitalists could be so good at censorship.

  32. . has a message for everyone: We can build this future.

  33. It just hit me that, tragically, someone probably did throw out an actual baby with the bathwater. Too high a price for the expression.

  34. "I think Gawker could do serious damage to the public interest." "Also TRUMP 2016!!!" You are a joke, .

  35. The problem (since basically forever) has been distinguishing between improving nature and destroying it.

  36. Alan Levinovitz ಹಿಂಬಾಲಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ , , ಮತ್ತು
    • @omosanzalette

      Researching new ways to accredit knowledge without tests or physical intermediaries () • Run • Solutionist • Promethean

    • @aaronecarroll

      Health services researcher | Policy wonk | Author | YouTube video creator at | Contributor to

  37. "Wow, thank God you asked me! That really would be a great treatment. Did you hear about it in a commercial?" --no doctor ever

  38. Nice stuff in here about a new study co-written by the great Paul Rozin (coined the term "Omnivore's Dilemma").

  39. : Salsa is actually spicy gazpacho.

ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.

Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಅಧಿಕವಾಗಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಈ ಕ್ಷಣದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಇನ್ನಷ್ಟು ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿ ಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.

    ಇದನ್ನೂ ಸಹ ನೀವು ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಬಹುದು

    ·