Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

proposal: add a storeCode property to LocalBusiness #791

Closed
danbri opened this Issue Sep 22, 2015 · 10 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
6 participants
Contributor

danbri commented Sep 22, 2015

storeCode (Text): an identifying code representing this place of business, typically assigned by the parentOrganization for use in structured URLs.

Motivation: many sites publish information about stores and other local businesses, where the parent organization for multiple branches assigns numeric or alphanumeric IDs to each branch. Often these are used in URL structures and as record IDs - it would be good to expose such information within schema.org markup.

example URL into Starbucks UK store finder: http://www.starbucks.co.uk/store-locator/search/location/w9%201qf/detail/3047 - here "3047" might be there storeCode of a particular branch of starbucks.

Collaborator

pmika commented Sep 23, 2015

+1

Contributor

danbri commented Sep 24, 2015

From @mfhepp via Skype IM, "storecode is fine for me, no objections."

Contributor

mfhepp commented Sep 24, 2015

+1

Contributor

chaals commented Sep 24, 2015

+1… feels about right.

Contributor

danbri commented Sep 24, 2015

Thanks all. Here is a slight refinement, based on feedback that we could cover more usecases with a terminology tweak: let's say "branchCode" to cover multi-site organizations that are not stores (e.g. libraries, transport, public sector etc etc.). The meaning remains essentially the same.

So something like ""A short textual code (also called "store code") that uniquely identifies a place of business. The code is typically assigned by the parentOrganization and used in structured URLs."" would address this.

Contributor

shankarnat commented Sep 28, 2015

+1

Contributor

danbri commented Sep 28, 2015

Thanks all. This is queued up and ready to go. For completeness a +1 from @scor would be great, but looks like this should go ahead...

Contributor

danbri commented Nov 6, 2015

@danbri danbri closed this Nov 6, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment