Steve Vladeckಪರಿಶೀಲಿಸಿದ ಖಾತೆ

@steve_vladeck

A. Dalton Cross Prof. . Co-host . nerd . Blogging /. Better ½: . Pug: .

Austin, TX
law.utexas.edu/faculty/stephe…
ಸೆಪ್ಟೆಂಬರ್ 2011 ಸಮಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಸೇರಿದ್ದಾರೆ
438 ಫೋಟೋಗಳು ಅಥವಾ ವೀಡಿಯೋಗಳು ಫೋಟೋಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ವೀಡಿಯೋಗಳು

ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳು

ನೀವು @steve_vladeck ಅವರನ್ನು ತಡೆಹಿಡಿದಿರುವಿರಿ

ಈ ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ವೀಕ್ಷಿಸಲು ನೀವು ಖಚಿತವಾಗಿ ಬಯಸುವಿರಾ? ಟ್ವೀಟ್ ವೀಕ್ಷಣೆಯು @steve_vladeck ಅವರ ತಡೆತೆರವುಗೊಳಿಸುವುದಿಲ್ಲ

  1. ಪಿನ್ ಮಾಡಿದ ಟ್ವೀಟ್
    ಏಪ್ರಿ 19

    The team hard at work recording Episode 13, with friend of the podcast and another special guest (not pictured).

    , , ಮತ್ತು
    3 replies 5 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 80ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  2. 6 ಗಂಟೆಗಳ ಹಿಂದೆ

    In the same statement, the military commission Convening Authority finds that Judge Spath was correct that there was no undue intrusion into attorney-client communications in Al-Nashiri, and then suggests building a “clean facility” to avoid such intrusion concerns. Umm...

    @MDParadis ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    BREAKING: Guantánamo military commissions overseer uphold’s Col Spath contempt finding against General Baker (but suspends the rest of his sentence). Full press release below:
    1 reply 16 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 26ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  3. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ನವೆಂ 21

    Today marks 10 weeks since the beginning of the episode involving a still-unnamed US citizen being held in Iraq as an enemy combatant, without access to counsel. At what point might we actually start to worry about the precedent his detention is setting?

    5 replies 110 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 128ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  4. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ನವೆಂ 12

    Would you rather have as your Senator: 1) An apparent pedophile with no respect for the rule of law or the supremacy of the Constitution who doesn’t believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in Congress; or 2) A Democrat? This is what used to be called a rhetorical question.

    163 replies 3,130 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 9,165ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  5. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ನವೆಂ 21

    We’re taking a rare break this week, for Thanksgiving. We are thankful for all of you, by the way!

    2 replies 2 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 33ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  6. ನವೆಂ 21

    Today marks 10 weeks since the beginning of the episode involving a still-unnamed US citizen being held in Iraq as an enemy combatant, without access to counsel. At what point might we actually start to worry about the precedent his detention is setting?

    5 replies 110 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 128ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  7. ನವೆಂ 20

    And if you get in trouble and need the US government’s help, make sure you obsequiously flatter before and after... ...or else.

    Headed overseas for the holidays? Follow these 5 tricks of the trade to travel safely: 1) Check for State Dept warnings 2) Notify US embassy of arrival 3) Dress like a local & avoid large public gatherings 4) Never use public wifi 5) Remain alert in airport/rail checkpoint lines
    1 reply 9 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 63ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  8. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ನವೆಂ 20
    ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ

    We just filed this motion for a hearing with Judge Chutkan

    2 replies 6 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 6ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  9. ನವೆಂ 20

    On remand from , 4th Cir. vacates its earlier (2.0) ruling and dismisses appeal as moot: But three judges dissented because they'd also vacate district's court ruling. Except district court rulings aren't precedential in the first place.

    4 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 6ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  10. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ನವೆಂ 20

    Your daily reminder that it’s now been over two months that a US citizen has been held in military custody as an “enemy combatant” without access to a lawyer, and we still don’t know who or where he is. Here’s my take from six weeks (!) ago:

    5 replies 114 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 118ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  11. ನವೆಂ 20

    Your daily reminder that it’s now been over two months that a US citizen has been held in military custody as an “enemy combatant” without access to a lawyer, and we still don’t know who or where he is. Here’s my take from six weeks (!) ago:

    5 replies 114 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 118ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  12. ನವೆಂ 18

    This is exactly why so many principled righties have been willing, however uncomfortably, to abide everything else they (and we) have had to endure from ’s presidency. I just fear they’ll come to think what many of us already do: That the price is far too high...

    I've covered for a lot of years. Attendees this year have an ebullience I haven't seen before. Buoyed by Trump's judicial picks.
    8 replies 16 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 55ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  13. ನವೆಂ 17

    A month ago today, and I debated on the when we’d get to the point at which the continuing detention of an unnamed citizen was cause for concern... One month (and no material change in situation) later, are we there yet?

    The Post is right: citizens have a clear right to habeas in this situation. Can’t foil that by refusing access to counsel indefinitely. Timing is an issue, but not after more than 2 months.
    2 replies 20 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 39ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  14. ನವೆಂ 17

    In which Judge Spath dragoons a reservist back into service for no reason other than to charge ahead with a capital case, even though the new lawyer will surely have the same ethical objections as the old ones... Oh, —never change...

    BREAKING: Judge Spath orders the Convening Authority to mobilize Reserve Navy Cmdr. Brian Mizer to service, 'at which point he can represent his client again.'
    2 replies 19 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 29ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  15. ನವೆಂ 17

    Hard to disagree with this excellent editorial about the John Doe U.S. citizen who’s been detained as an enemy combatant for more than two months. It’s been a week since habeas briefing ha been completed. Paging Judge Chutkan...

    The Pentagon has detained a U.S. citizen for more than two months — and said little
    22 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 34ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  16. ನವೆಂ 17

    January 2018 argument calendar is out:

    4 replies 6 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 14ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  17. ನವೆಂ 16
    ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ

    Here's my October 2016 post that considers this issue in the context of a _different_ military commission dispute:

    4 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 6ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  18. ನವೆಂ 16

    FWIW, it's not _at all_ clear that the _military_ has the power to arrest and/or confine a recalcitrant civilian witness. The relevant U.S. Code provision (10 U.S.C. § 847) makes defiance of such a subpoena a _civilian_ criminal offense:

    BREAKING: New York judge declines to quash Guantánamo subpoena ordering Hofstra Law professor to tele-testify to the war court.
    2 replies 25 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 34ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  19. ನವೆಂ 16

    : Episode 46 of dropped last night, in which & I covered a (surprisingly busy) week in national security law news:

    Ep. 46 is now live! We’ve got: 1. FISA disclosures & standing 2. A 2nd special counsel? 3. NDAA GTMO & cyber provisions 4. SFRC & nukes 5. Flynn, Gulen, & pardons 6. Doe v. Mattis And...best movie sequels ever.
    1 reply 4 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 12ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  20. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ನವೆಂ 16

    Ep. 46 is now live! We’ve got: 1. FISA disclosures & standing 2. A 2nd special counsel? 3. NDAA GTMO & cyber provisions 4. SFRC & nukes 5. Flynn, Gulen, & pardons 6. Doe v. Mattis And...best movie sequels ever.

    6 replies 6 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 18ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
  21. ನವೆಂ 15

    Thoughtful post from my former colleague Amanda Frost on Carlos Vázquez & my new article on ruling in Montgomery and how/why it portends a "new" constitutional right to collateral post-conviction review...

    New post: Academic highlight: Vázquez and Vladeck on the constitutional right to post-conviction review
    3 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 2ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು

@steve_vladeck ಅವರು ಇನ್ನೂ ಟ್ವೀಟ್ ಮಾಡಿಲ್ಲ.

ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.

Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಮೀರಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಕ್ಷಣಿಕವಾದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.

    ಇದನ್ನೂ ಸಹ ನೀವು ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಬಹುದು

    ·