Hi,

I assume you are aware of the recent discussions around the so-called 'Facebook BSD+Patents License'. The Apache Software Foundation Legal Affairs Committee has announced that this license is no longer allowed to be used as a direct dependency in Apache projects. Based on this decision, the RocksDB project re-licensed their code and people have reached out to other Facebook projects to consider doing the same. (I’m not affiliated with Apache in any way.)

I understand that the decision on which license to use is completely up to Facebook and I’m grateful that you started and open-sourced GraphQL. I just wanted to make you aware that the current license prevents some companies and organisations to use GraphQL.

I would kindly ask if you would consider changing the license of this project to something that’s easier to integrate for other companies.

Thanks

No one on our team of engineers is well versed enough to make these legal decisions, but I will bring this to our legal team for further consideration

any progress after react post ?

Thanks for pinging, @sirmak.

For others reading this, the referenced post is https://code.facebook.com/posts/112130496157735/explaining-react-s-license/

We appreciate this request. We have seriously considered it but have decided not to change our license at this time (although the post title mentions "React's license", the body of it explains how we evaluated the question in the context of "all of our other open source" projects too).

I'm going to close this as I don't think I have anything else to add beyond what's in that post. Please read it if you'd like to know more.