There were contextual clues that I felt were sufficient definition.

Referring to ETH's as 14.75% and BTC at 4% informs the reader. It wasn't a word I used without context, accordingly. I frankly don't believe the confusion was as much as is claimed. I don't mind getting trolled, feigned ignorance by management is a bit frustrating. I would rather just have it said that the person was trolling, as a person becomes both the victim and the attacker in the current context.

Block Reward up until 6 months ago essentially only had 1 definition, and that was the BTC definition. Since then the market place has dramatically changed, and several new 'proof of stake' block chains have gained millions, and billions, in market cap (Dash, Tezos, ANS (NEO), so on). These are not PoS in the technical definition, but have the same economic effects, which creates are reaction

So educated persons are required to apply reasoning and logic to what they read. To Gen Public, they respond to trigger words like "proof of stake" and "block rewards" and "more miners!", etc.

This was a writing geared toward simply public understanding, with technical details added for clarity. No one is suggesting to reduce the transaction fees, which are a part of block reward, and creates public confusion in the the way they are used today, and was a topic that was largely irrelevant 6 months ago, thus the historical 'not giving a shit' about what the words actually mean.

Even in your google, there was no easily understood term that stood out, as it is poorly understood. It's sort of like calling it "global warming". It's not that people prefer the cold, it's the pollution and extinctions that become problematic to life. "Global pollution and mass extinction" is more objectionable than warmth, as it is more clear as to what you are rejecting.

I do not want to reduce block rewards, I would like to reduce the empty block bonuses only, as ETH blocks are significantly more full than they were 6 months ago.

There is no useful terminology because the discussion of the subject is not well understood.

Likewise, people refer to miners and believe they 'send the transactions' and thus think more miners = faster transactions. This is become there is insufficient historical context. Today, it should be called Hash Miners and Staked Miners. There is a term "Master Node", which means Staked Mining, but it should be understood that both "master nodes" and Miners are the same, and it should be more emphasized that adding Hash power does NOT speed up transactions.

That is excessively poorly understood, and is becoming an important part of block chain discussion.