Last week I went to a community meeting hosted by PBOT to discuss the Clinton Neighborhood Greenway Enhancement Project. A small group objected to a portion of the project (if you ride on SE Clinton you may have seen their flyers) and was allowed to present their case at the meeting. My take-away from their presentation is that they demanded that nothing be done unless all their demands were included in Phase I of the project. A tad pushy to my mind. The following is the email I just sent to all the members of the city council and the project manager, Rich Newlands. (Personal info redacted, 2 typos corrected, and photos were not included in the email.)
I’m writing to urge you to proceed without delay on the Phase I testing of diverters as outlined at the community meeting on 11/5/2015 at Waverly Congregational Church.
I live on the Clinton Corridor […] and my family uses it to commute to schools […] and work, as well as to get to some of our favorite businesses: Off the Waffle, St. Honore Boulangerie, Little Big Burger, Fred Meyer’s, and both the Seven Corners and Hawthorne New Seasons Markets.
I have been working with Safer Clinton (not to be confused with the month-old group of Woodward Avenue residents who have chosen a very similar name) and BikeLoudPDX for over a year trying to turn our Neighborhood Greenway back into an actual Safe Route to School. I am thrilled that our meetings, letter writing, tweets, and protest rides have turned into a project that will include diverters right away and then more data collection and (fingers crossed!) more diverters. As someone who thinks that cars should be driven on Greenways the same way that bikes should be ridden on arterials — from the closest possible intersection to the destination and no more — I can agree with my Woodward neighbors that one diverter, signs, and speed bumps will not produce the result we want. However, I vehemently disagree that the project should be put on hold for more data collection and discussion. I want progress, change, and a show of good faith by my city that they care about the safety of my family.
While I understand their desire to keep their children safe, they have only been working on this for a month. Where were they last school year when I was talking to Abernethy parents in person and online, collecting signatures and asking the city for action? They cannot pretend they were unaware of us and specifically my outreach at Abernethy. They had time to voice their concerns. The time to say “this project needs to stop” was long ago. The time to say “this project must be perfect or it shouldn’t start” never existed.
There are many things I would like done to make our Greenway and the whole neighborhood safer.
- I would like SE 27th Avenue closed off at Division for cars. Besides the block’s residents and destination drivers coming to nearby businesses (who could access our street via Clinton), [I have seen] many speeding cut-through drivers avoiding the signal at SE 26th and Division. These drivers don’t seem to notice the small Playground signs for Piccolo Park and I’m very surprised that there have been no injuries or deaths in the 4.5 years we have lived here.
- I would like diverters every 2-3 blocks even in the SE 21st – 26th commercial corridor. There are far too many poorly-trained and speeding delivery drivers that stay on Clinton after making a delivery for me to feel safe. Just like the downtown core, the last mile deliveries should be made in smaller vehicles when they need to come down Greenways and residential streets.
- I would remove the round-abouts (like at SE 23rd or SE 31st and Clinton) in favor of diverters and to eliminate pinch points especially on hills where large bikes like mine (a 90-pound bakfiets before cargo is added) can be passed by faster-moving conventional bikes.
- I would make it illegal for cars and trucks (via a weight limit in the law) to pass bicycles on all neighborhood Greenways. Signage could be similar to the “Do Not Enter, Except Bicycles” signs at SE Lincoln and SE Clinton where they cross Chavez.*
My question for you is this: would it be reasonable for me and any supporters I can find to demand that PBOT do nothing unless these 4 items are included in Phase I? Absolutely not! I’m well aware that these 4 items serve a smaller population and may not be best for the city as a whole. As much as I think they would make biking on Clinton and my children safer, my pet features not being in Phase I shouldn’t bring the entire process to a halt. Trying to have the project perfect in Phase I doesn’t make any practical sense.
I’d like to suggest that this group should be offered 1 seat on the Citizen Advisory Committee if they truly want to participate in making the project better for their corner of the neighborhood. I know that I will be asking to be on this committee myself.
Thank you for your time and your commitment to making alternatives to personal vehicles safer and more convenient across Portland.
Kathleen Youell, Family Biking Activist
PDX Cargo Bike Gang and Portlandize.com
Here’s hoping that an entire project isn’t brought to its knees by a tiny group that popped up at the end of the planning process to complain that they have fears.
*This is a photo of SE Lincoln where it crosses Chavez showing the signage I referenced.








