1/ Publicly corporations shrinking from 7,507 in 1997 to ~3,500 now. Academics: they lack "ambition, proper incentives, or opportunities."
-
-
Professors claiming that businesses "lack ambition" should operate an actual hot dog stand over summer vacation.https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-01-04/corporations-need-a-new-reason-to-be …
-
4/ The "likeliest culprits appear to be declining competitive pressures." Unbelievable! Tenured professors evaluating competition levels.
-
5/ Innovation is as likely to destroy a moat as create one. Often innovation creates <$0 profit. No moat? No profit.
-
@trengriffin Kahneman in Thinking, Fast & Slow talks about the value of "optimistic martyrs"= firms that identify new markets for incumbentspic.twitter.com/7ZZCAQ1M1L
-
-
-
@trengriffin don't you think the shrinking of investment banking for smaller companies & rise of private equity are the reason? -
@nachkari No. Moats are harder to create. -
@trengriffin you don't need a moat to go public? There are a lot of really awful publiclly traded companies -
@trengriffin most public companies I look at sub $1bn don't have any moat and don't have a bright LT future. Yet they are public -
@nachkari At one point some people believed they would. Or they lost their moat.
-
-
@trengriffin alterative scenario is software creating more winner take all sectors, creating 1 large company w/ less competitors than past
ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.
Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಮೀರಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಕ್ಷಣಿಕವಾದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.
Tren Griffin
Jake Cahan
Nick
Ryan Dunton