Twitter | Chercher | |
SCOTUSblog
A private blog. NOT THE JUSTICES OR THE COURT. Contact: [email protected].
7 815
Tweets
40
Abonné
300 900
Abonnés
Tweets
SCOTUSblog 19 h
rejects “dual-officeholding” challenge to military conviction, with our analysis in Ortiz v. US
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 23 h
"Today the Supreme Court ruled that...police will generally need to get a warrant to obtain cell-site location information, a record of the cell towers (or other sites) with which a cellphone connected," writes in her analysis of Carpenter v. US
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 24 h
Yesterday the court held that government notice ordering noncitizen to appear for deportation proceedings without specifying date or time does not stop clock for purposes of length of time spent in US & therefore eligibility to avoid deportation. Jennifer Chacon has our analysis
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
En réponse à @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in Carpenter v. US:
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
holds 5-4 that police need a warrant to get location information from cellphone tower sites
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
En réponse à @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in WesternGeco v. Ion:
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
En réponse à @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in Currier v. Virginia:
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
holds damages for overseas infringement of a domestic patent include lost profits for overseas contracts the patentholder would have obtained if the infringement hadn't occurred.
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
En réponse à @SCOTUSblog
This means the defendant loses his protection under the Constitution's double jeopardy clause.
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
En réponse à @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in Ortiz v. US:
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
holds simultaneous service by judges on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
holds that a defendant facing multiple charges who consents to separate trials forfeits his right to benefit from acquittal at first trial
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 22 juin
We're live-blogging with . has 10 more cases to decide. One or more coming at 10am. Join us at this link:
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 21 juin
"Another triumph for a textualist mode of statutory interpretation that prioritizes dictionary definitions over practical consequences," writes of in his analysis of Wisconsin Central v. United States.
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog a Retweeté
Amy Howe 21 juin
has 10 cases left to decide. Who might be writing? I try to parse it out on my blog today:
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 21 juin
“strikes a major blow at one of the centerpieces of the administrative state” in Lucia v. SEC, but it still “may be years before the implications [of the ruling] are clear”; Ronald Mann of has our opinion analysis
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 21 juin
En réponse à @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in South Dakota v. Wayfair:
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 21 juin
rules that states can charge out-of-state retailers sales tax, at least in some circumstances, even if they don’t have a store or warehouse in the state, clearing the way to allow sales taxes on internet purchases.
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 21 juin
En réponse à @SCOTUSblog
Here's the opinion in Pereira v. Sessions:
Reply Retweet Aimer
SCOTUSblog 21 juin
holds that DHS notice ordering non-citizen to appear for deportation proceedings but without specifying date or time does not stop clock for purposes of length of time spent in US & therefore eligibility to avoid being deported
Reply Retweet Aimer