Nice seeing the occasional non Indian post
Thanks for contributing. However, your submission was removed from /r/Futurology
Rule 13 - Content older than 6 months must have [month, year] in the title.
Refer to the subreddit rules, the transparency wiki, or the domain blacklist for more information
Naicce
Computer processing doubles every couple of years or so. It's estimated that around 2045 we will reach the point where that processing power reaches the equivalent of the human brain. In essence computers will be as smart as humans. No one knows what they will be able to accomplish at that point. Solve physics equations, analyze vast amounts of data (with understanding), run simulations, find cures for diseases. Two years after that they will be twice as smart as humans, two years after that four times and so on.
The "singularity" is our inability to guess what will happen or what we will be capable of after 2045.
Three million years of linear evolution and advancement has made us incapable of grasping the speed of exponential advancement brought in by computers. It's exciting and scarry all at the same time.
We've already crossed the computing power of a single human brain in hardware terms.. We're waiting for sw to catch up(AGI). We'll hit the computing power equivalent of an entire civilization's brainpower in a few decades. 2045 is the nebulous point beyond which nothing is discernible.
This is an excellent starting point.. it gets pretty deep from there. Leading on to here. This is the definitive textbook on it till date.
Link to paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326364629_The_dark_core_of_personality
Abstract:
Many negatively connoted personality traits (often termed “dark traits”) have been introduced to account for ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior. Herein, we provide a unifying, comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding dark personality in terms of a general dispositional tendency of which dark traits arise as specific manifestations. That is, we theoretically specify the common core of dark traits, which we call the Dark Factor of Personality ( D ). The fluid concept of D captures individual differences in the tendency to maximize one’s individual utility—disregarding, accepting, or malevolently provoking disutility for others—accompanied by beliefs that serve as justifications. To critically test D, we unify and extend prior work methodologically and empirically by considering a large number of dark traits simultaneously, using statistical approaches tailored to capture both the common core and the unique content of dark traits, and testing the predictive validity of both D and the unique content of dark traits with respect to diverse criteria including fully consequential and incentive-compatible behavior. In a series of four studies ( N > 2,500), we provide evidence in support of the theoretical conceptualization of D, show that dark traits can be understood as specific manifestations of D, demonstrate that D predicts a multitude of criteria in the realm of ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior, and illustrate that D does not depend on any particular indicator variable included.
It's Year Million.
It's really good at explaining the coming singularity and speculating post-singularity implications. Sometimes gets a bit far out there, but mostly it's good stuff and it's all hypothetically possible.
Great
This is a rough estimate based on the common claim that the lake is 12 miles wide and at least 1 meter deep. The cube has the same volume as a 6 mile radius cylinder with height of 1 meter, as calculated here. The lake is about 1 mile underground near the southern polar ice cap and super salty. This is just a minimum and the lake may be much deeper. It's also possible that there's less due to lake geometry or none at all if the reading turns out to be explained in some other way.
If anyone has a better estimate of the lake volume, let me know. It's a strange shape so it's hard to estimate.
Could have made the cube blue, you know..
Original (posted a few minutes before yours): https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/93f7yj/this_prosthesis_lets_you_multitask_with_three_arms/
Didn't we have a metric of the one that reaches a threshold of upvotes? That one's not really that popular, my titles more reddit friendly.
I couldn't confirm that this was ever finalised to be honest.
Meh, nvm no big deal boss, this doesn't even seem to be so popular either
Hey guys. I know this subreddit really loves to talk about Elon Musk. I compiled all the comments mentioning Elon since Jan.1, 2015 and fed it through a sentiment analyzer called VADER.
I found some interesting results, including which subreddits hates Elon, and which ones like him. I also analyzed how the sentiment changes over time.
Code is provided in the article.
Very interesting man, very well done job. You could have searched for "elon" and "musk" separately too, that'd have given you a bigger data pool.
13,193,971 subscribers
42,558 subscribers
145 subscribers
