|
Ryan Goodman
@
rgoodlaw
New York, NY
|
|
Former Special Counsel @DeptofDefense. Co-editor-in-chief @just_security. Chaired Professor NYU Law. Former Chaired Professor Harvard Law.
|
|
|
8,582
推文
|
2,000
正在跟隨
|
56,255
跟隨者
|
| 推文 |
| Ryan Goodman 已轉推 | ||
|
Caroline Orr
@RVAwonk
|
1 小時 |
|
#BREAKING: House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler has issued a subpoena for the unredacted Mueller report.
|
||
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
3 小時 |
|
An added touch: Note the photo the New York Times used for our op-ed. Why's it so grainy, and unusual?
Washington Post 5/10/17: "Russia's state news agency['s] photographer was the only one allowed in the meeting, while U.S. journalists were kept out."
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
4 小時 |
|
"the report details plenty of collusion"
- @KenDilanianNBC
"damning series of facts" on collusion
@zackbeauchamp
@AshaRangappa_ thread highlights counterintel issues
In NYT, @jgeltzer and I analyze very serious counterintel issues in Mueller report:
nytimes.com/2019/04/19/opi…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
14 小時 |
|
2. Here's the Politico story on what Mueller uncovered — and felt the need to report — about Burr's back channel to the White House.
(reporting by @burgessev and @marianne_levine, h/t to @NatashaBertrand for tweeting this out).
politico.com/story/2019/04/…
2/2
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
14 小時 |
|
Important about Senate Intelligence Committee Chair, Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC)
1. A significant nugget in Mueller Report: fingers Senator Burr as secretly feeding probe's info to White House (Politico story)
2. My earlier research and deep dive on Burr:
justsecurity.org/62573/richard-…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
14 小時 |
|
I appreciate this analysis of my @just_security article on Bill Barr’s coverup of Justice Dept opinion in 1989.
Now reading Mueller report compared to Barr’s summary and Thurs morning overview....
As @JohnAvlon said, the Past is Prologue. cnn.com/videos/politic…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
15 小時 |
|
*tome!
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
16 小時 |
|
Unlike the Attorney General who was able to read this tomb of a report (including all the redacted parts), completely form his legal views, and compose his summary in 48 hours, I'm a slow reader. twitter.com/justinhendrix/…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
23 小時 |
|
.@DanaBashCNN just reported that the same preview was not provided to other people who are in same position as Trump (people who the report will likely have derogatory info about them too).
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
24 小時 |
|
Note: Personal lawyer. Not executive branch official. twitter.com/jonathanvswan/…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
4月18日 |
|
Exactly.
Plus illegality -- on their theory, as stated by Barr -- turns on whether Trump campaign associates participated in underlying hacking conspiracy.
|
||
|
|
||
| Ryan Goodman 已轉推 | ||
|
southpaw
@nycsouthpaw
|
4月18日 |
|
Close reading would suggest that they participated, just not illegally justice.gov/opa/speech/att… pic.twitter.com/7WkKlUJB53
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
4月18日 |
|
Barr's description of Trump campaign involvement in Russia-WikiLeaks operation to distribute (includes timing, coordination of messaging) stolen emails was VERY NARROWLY worded compared to Barr's description of IRA and GRU hacking. And let's not just focus here on criminality. twitter.com/rgoodlaw/statu…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
4月18日 |
|
Here's the key part of #BarrStatement on collusion with Russia-WikiLeaks operation to distribute stolen emails. pic.twitter.com/EipsrrO4ss
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
4月18日 |
|
Based on #Barr presser, I recommend paying attention to Mueller report on Trump campaign connections to Russia-Wikileaks ops to distribute stolen emails.
Barr's wording was about whether their actions were illegal, and referenced to support of hacking (both odd qualifications).
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
4月18日 |
|
Barr then adds: “we did not rely SOLELY on that in making our decision” – so they did rely IN PART on different legal theory of obstruction?
Then says: “we accepted the Special Counsel’s legal framework for purposes of our analysis” – is 'framework' the same as legal theories?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
4月18日 |
|
Barr: “the Deputy Attorney General and I DISAGREED with some of the Special Counsel’s legal theories” on #ObstructionOfJustice
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
4月18日 |
|
My interview today on Mueller report's release on @TheTakeaway @WNYC with @tanzinavega
wnycstudios.org/story/william-…
|
||
|
|
||
| Ryan Goodman 已轉推 | ||
|
Asha Rangappa
@AshaRangappa_
|
4月18日 |
|
Me this morning pic.twitter.com/KACNNaEYKG
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ryan Goodman
@rgoodlaw
|
4月18日 |
|
Recall key exchange on whether will claim executive privilege:
Barr 1: Asks for restating question
Barr 2: would have to be asserted by President (Trump said he wouldn’t)
Barr 3: notes loophole: President has left decision to me
Barr 4: I have “no plan” to do that pic.twitter.com/PnN4bhqfCZ
|
||
|
|
||