ทวิตเตอร์ | ค้นหา | |
tina morphis
BA Journalism/Public Relations, Single Mother of 1, I did chemo for 11 yrs to be here, NO one will scare me away.
309,297
ทวีต
4,678
กําลังติดตาม
10,941
ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีต
tina morphis ถูกรีทวีต
Andrew Feinberg 3 ชม.
Stop lying, — he was jailed because there’s no way to guarantee he won’t keep witness tampering if he stayed out. The judge said NOTHING about his guilt or innocence, but was VERY clear about why she had to revoke his bail. Didn’t you used to be Alan Dershowitz?
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis ถูกรีทวีต
Chidi 2 ชม.
การตอบกลับถึง @realDonaldTrump
Cardinal Dolan ~ “You don’t follow man’s law if it violates God's law. Taking a baby from the arms of a mother goes against human decency and it goes against human dignity."
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis ถูกรีทวีต
Amy Siskind 50 นาที
Media-when you do go down to visit places migrant children are being housed, go to locations not on the tour. Remember what Hitler did w/the media and Jewish children. Assume the Trump regime will show you what they want you to see. (CAN’T BELIEVE THIS IS HAPPENING IN AMERICA!)
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis ถูกรีทวีต
Mikel Jollett 51 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @Mikel_Jollett
Trump has always admired absolute power and the dehumanization of vulnerable people. This was clear from the start.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis ถูกรีทวีต
Mikel Jollett 1 ชม.
When Trump called Mexicans “rapists & murderers” people said he was just brash. When he refused to disavow the KKK, put “C” for “colored” on lease applications, led the birthers, kept Hitler speeches by his bed... Don’t say you didn’t know All of this was clear from the start.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis ถูกรีทวีต
TheBadHombreAccount 12 ชม.
Don Lemon just went off on Steve Cortes, a Donald Trump defender and got him to admit that Trump is a liar and that separating children from their fams IS NOT a Democrat law but just a practice of the Trump administration.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis ถูกรีทวีต
LiA 1 ชม.
การตอบกลับถึง @realDonaldTrump
Here is the Trump Administration's announcement of a "Zero-Tolerance Policy for Criminal Illegal Entry," from AG Sessions. This policy is directly responsible for the separation of migrant families, despite the lie from Trump that it's the fault of Congressional Dems.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis ถูกรีทวีต
Beth Reinhard 48 นาที
No U.S. president has been as admiring of dictators and absolute power as Trump, historians say.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis ถูกรีทวีต
Oliver Willis 52 นาที
Breitbart's role in defending Trump's child abduction and abuse policy is to tell the Jews that it's warm and toasty in the oven and why are they complaining since it's cold outside.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 51 นาที
Shooting in just took an American life. , please do something.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 52 นาที
There are several of these fake accounts, all using military phoros of people please block them Is a bot? Check with ! via
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 53 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @joebferraro @MSNBC
Yes, exactly
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 54 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @TinaMorphis
meaning to the report that isn’t there, conferring legitimacy on the manipulation of the inspector general’s findings in service of a bad-faith assertion.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 54 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @TinaMorphis
Take the Times’ claim that the report may boost efforts to undermine Comey’s credibility as an obstruction witness. As David Leonhardt notes, the IG report doesn’t question Comey’s credibility; it questions his judgment in his handling of the Clinton case. So that claim adds
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 54 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @TinaMorphis
findings do indeed provide “fodder” for those arguments, effectively conferring legitimacy on the Trump/GOP interpretation of them. This rewards bad-faith arguments. The IG report simply does not legitimately lend “fodder” to efforts to undermine the Mueller probe.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 54 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @TinaMorphis
To be sure, these accounts sometimes quote an interested party on the other side saying the findings don’t support the Trump/GOP interpretation. Yet this isn’t enough, particularly since these accounts also state as neutral fact, in the voice of the omniscient journalist, that
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 54 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @TinaMorphis
a “deep state” coup. But here’s the problem: There is no neutral way to make this claim. Either the inspector general’s actual findings legitimately support that Trumpian argument about the significance of those findings, or they do not.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 54 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @TinaMorphis
any case of obstruction of justice.” The Associated Press claims the report gave Republicans “ample fodder” to “question” the Russia probe. The Post says the report will serve as a GOP “cudgel” against Mueller. CNN asserts that the inspector general gave Trump “fodder” to claim
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 54 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @TinaMorphis
alongside true ones — that has to go. For instance, the New York Times quotes a Trump ally pushing his narrative, and then asserts as fact that “any independent criticism” of Comey “helps” Trump “undermine the credibility of someone who may be a crucial witness against him in
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
tina morphis 54 นาที
การตอบกลับถึง @TinaMorphis
Yes, they also convey that the inspector general’s overall conclusion undercuts the Trumpian narrative. But the straddle itself is the problem. It showcases a convention often relied upon in political journalism — the use of the “lends fodder” formulation to float false claims
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ