ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳು

	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	57 ನಿಮಿ
	ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @jimgeraghty If John Kerry had won two percentage points more in Ohio in 2004, I am sure we would - from Republicans. And they would be right to do so.
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	EverQueen Mason @EverdeenMason	3 ಗಂ.
	me as an editor vs me when it's time for me to write pic.twitter.com/rvB7wYjedh
	ಫೋಟೋ ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	ಜನವರಿ 27
	ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @SamWangPhD On top of all this, the Electoral College poses a serious national security risk. The number of votes that have to be hacked to flip an election can be quite small. pic.twitter.com/KoG3Qf19Au
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	ಜನವರಿ 27
	ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @SamWangPhD And guess what? Turnout in non-swing states is lower than in battleground states. That's bad for democracy, without a doubt. pic.twitter.com/9jQCb6usMO
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	ಜನವರಿ 27
	ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @FiveThirtyEight In any given year, only a handful of states are genuinely up for grabs. Today the closest states are more white, fewer blacks, as well as (to pick a few examples) fewer Mormons and within-50-state Puerto Ricans. (first image, @FiveThirtyEight. Voter power calculation, PEC) pic.twitter.com/jFnoI4yGL2
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	ಜನವರಿ 27
	Actually, no. For example, in 2016 the minimum number of jurisdictions needed to reach Hillary Clinton’s popular majority was 39 states plus DC. But let’s get serious. Let’s review origins, consequences, & flaws of the Electoral College. [here beginneth the thread] twitter.com/JustinTHaskins…
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	2 ಗಂ.
	This is not a matter of D's or R's. It's a matter of giving an incentive for candidates to reach all Americans. It's *currently* the case that rural areas are ignored. And Senator Graham's own South Carolina got no visits in 2016. Change that! See: twitter.com/SamWangPhD/sta… twitter.com/LindseyGrahamS…
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	2 ಗಂ.
	ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @LindseyGrahamSC No, it's the opposite. Most rural regions/states get very little attention from presidential candidates. A national popular vote would give an incentive to go to every state - including South Carolina, which received no visits during 2016's campaign: twitter.com/SamWangPhD/sta…
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	3 ಗಂ.
	If you're worried about big-state domination, it's the *current* system that allows that. If one adds up the popular vote in 2016, it would have taken 39 states plus DC to get to a win. That would require national reach by either candidate. More: twitter.com/SamWangPhD/sta… twitter.com/jbouie/status/…
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	3 ಗಂ.
	"Buried in the debate about Trump’s mental health is the misinformed assumption that mental illness disqualifies someone for high leadership. If this were policy, Lincoln and Churchill would have been lost to history due to their battles with depression." statnews.com/2017/09/06/don…
	ಸಾರಾಂಶ ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	7 ಗಂ.
	"[France's Europe minister] Ms Loiseau joked in an interview with the French press that she had nicknamed her pet cat 'Brexit' because of the way in which it meowed loudly to leave the house but then stood there when she opened the door." independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
	ಸಾರಾಂಶ ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Heather Cox Richardson (TDPR) @HC_Richardson	ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 19
	The problem is not necessarily the Electoral College; the problem is that in the early 19th C the EC changed from a deliberative system to a winner-take-all system. Both add a mechanism between the popular vote and the president, but one is a brake, the other an accelerator. /1
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Steven White @notstevenwhite	15 ಗಂ.
	ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @jbouie My sense is that opponents of a national popular vote don't actually care about large vs. small states at all (except as empty rhetoric); they just believe that people in large cities should count less than people in small towns (regardless of the state).
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie	15 ಗಂ.
	I have been thinking about the zombie argument that a popularly-elected president would let “big states dominate small states” and it is still unintelligible to me. I cannot figure out the logic.
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Jon Favreau @jonfavs	15 ಗಂ.
	Open to ending the filibuster: Warren, Inslee, Buttigieg, Beto, Booker Unsure/conflicted: Bernie, Kamala, Gillibrand, Klobuchar Who else has been asked that I’m missing?
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Kevin Whitelaw @KevinWhitelaw1	17 ಗಂ.
	SCOOP: A pilot who hitched a ride on a Lion Air flight saved the 737 Max from a plunge by telling the crew to disable a malfunctioning flight-control system. The next day, the same plane crashed in the Java Sea, killing 189. bloom.bg/2HGRzY0
	ಸಾರಾಂಶ ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Robinson Meyer @yayitsrob	ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 19
	According to the latest Iowa Poll, climate change may be one of the top two issues for Dem caucus goers. It’s tied only with *health care* for levels of concern. I wrote about this surprising result—and the new nationwide mobilization around the issue: theatlantic.com/science/archiv… pic.twitter.com/jutMO8qoFz
	ಫೋಟೋ ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	NPR @NPR	ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 19
	ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @NPR Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern called the suspect "a terrorist," "a criminal" and "an extremist." "But he will, when I speak, be nameless," she told Parliament. npr.org/2019/03/18/704…
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 19
	ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @Timeisanarrow @queenofthinair projects.fivethirtyeight.com/partisan-gerry…
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	Sam Wang @SamWangPhD	ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 18
	ಇವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ @Philanx In those particular states, yes. Overturning those maps would likely gain 2-3 House seats for Democrats in North Carolina, and 1 House seat for Republicans in Maryland. Somewhat cancelling in terms of raw power...but they would improve competition in both states.
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·