Твиттер | Поиск | |
Vipin Narang
Associate professor of political science at MIT, focusing on nuclear proliferation and strategy, North Korean nukes, South Asian security, and a lot in between.
12 490
Твиты
661
Читаемые
19 669
Читатели
Твиты
Vipin Narang ретвитнул(а)
Brian Klaas 10 ч.
So that non-binding pledge that Trump just signed with Kim Jong-un looks a lot like the documents signed in the early 1990s. And we all know how seriously North Korea took those non-binding pledges... (h/t )
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 54 мин.
В ответ @d_extrovert
Yes
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 4 ч.
Read this by . Brilliant and absolutely spot-on, as always:
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang ретвитнул(а)
Vipin Narang 5 ч.
President Trump said he was going to take away Kim’s nuclear weapons. Instead he legitimized the value of nuclear weapons in international politics. Even a “pipsqueak fourth rate power” can bring the US to the table and win if it has nuclear weapons. Open season now.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang ретвитнул(а)
Vipin Narang 10 ч.
Remember when they remade the movie Karate Kid 25 years later? That’s what this is:
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 4 ч.
Catch me on at 9am talk about, what else...North Korea
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 4 ч.
Don’t worry it won’t take long
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 4 ч.
I would’ve chosen a different word than “conspicuous”, like 🤬, but yep
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang ретвитнул(а)
Ankit Panda 5 ч.
В ответ @NarangVipin
Accepting deterrence don't look so bad in hindsight.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 5 ч.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang ретвитнул(а)
Ankit Panda 5 ч.
Trump's comments on US-ROK annual joint exercises are worse than initially reported. Instead of Kim agreeing to phased CVID, Trump's effectively set out on phased alliance dismantlement.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 5 ч.
President Trump said he was going to take away Kim’s nuclear weapons. Instead he legitimized the value of nuclear weapons in international politics. Even a “pipsqueak fourth rate power” can bring the US to the table and win if it has nuclear weapons. Open season now.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 5 ч.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 5 ч.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 5 ч.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang ретвитнул(а)
Vipin Narang 10 ч.
There it is: a vague meaningless pledge in exchange for a vague meaningless guarantee.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 6 ч.
It sounds to me he may have agreed to “freeze for freeze” — missile and nuclear testing moratorium in exchange for suspending exercises—on the fly.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang ретвитнул(а)
Bruce Klingner 9 ч.
This is very disappointing. Each of the four main points was in previous documents with NK, some in a stronger, more encompassing way. The denuke bullet is weaker than the Six Party Talks language. And no mention of CVID, verification, human rights.
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang ретвитнул(а)
The Daily Beast 6 ч.
The only language on "denuclearization" the U.S. and North Korea agreed on in their joint statement was complete pablum, writes , and it puts the U.S.'s future relationship with South Korea in doubt
Reply Retweet Нравится
Vipin Narang 6 ч.
В ответ @wslafoy
🤦🏽‍♂️
Reply Retweet Нравится